Beatus quid est and the study of grammar in late anglo-saxon England

Martha Bayless
Summary

Beatus quid est, a Latin grammar of English origin, found in an eleventh-century manuscript, has much to tell us about the pedagogy of elementary grammar in the classroom. The text is assembled from a number of grammmatical authorities, foremost among them Donatus and Priscian, uses the framework of a parsing-grammar, and attempts to forge these contradictory authorities into a coherent practical teaching-text. In particular elaborate glosses, annotations and conventions of capitalization and layout reflect the practices of the classroom. The text emphasizes morphology and supplies illustrations of grammatical points from verse. Glosses suggest paraphrases and serve as a reference-tool for many points not formally discussed in the main text. These features most likely reflect standard pedagogical practice in the classroom; the chief innovation of the manuscript is that such practices appear in written form.

Quick links
Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price. Direct PDF access to this article can be purchased through our e-platform.

References

Baird, J. L., G. Baglivi and J. R. Kane
1986The Chronicle of Salimbene de Adam (= Medieval and Renaissance Texts and Studies 40). Binghamton: Center for Medieval and Early Renaissance Studies.Google Scholar
Balogh, J.
1927 “Voces paginarum. Beiträge zur Geschichte des lauten Lesens und Schreibens”. Philologus 82.84–109, 202–240.Google Scholar
Keil, H.
1961Grammatici Latini 3. Hildesheim: Georg Olms (1st edition, Leipzig: Teubner 1859).Google Scholar
Holtz, Louis
1981Donat et la tradition de l’enseignement grammatical. Paris: Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.Google Scholar
1989/90 “Les nouvelles tendances de la pédagogie grammaticale au Xe siècle”. Lateinische Kultur im X. Jahrhundert, ed. Walter Berschin (= Mittellateinisches Jahrbuch 24/25), 163–73.Google Scholar
Ker, N. R.
1957Catalogue of Manuscripts Containing Anglo-Saxon. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Lapidge, M.
1982 “The study of Latin texts in late Anglo-Saxon England, I: the evidence of Latin glosses”. Latin and the Vernacular Languages in Early Medieval Britain. Ed. by Nicholas Brooks. Leicester: Leicester University Press, pp. 99–140.Google Scholar
Law, Vivien
1982The Insular Latin Grammarians. Woodbridge, Suffolk: Boydell and Brewer.Google Scholar
Anglo-Saxon England: Aelfric’s Excerptiones de arte grammatica anglice ”. Histoire Épistémologie Langage 9.47–71. DOI logo
Lendinara, Patrizia
1986 “The third book of the Bella Parisiacae urbis by Abbo of Saint-Germain-des-Prés and its Old English gloss”. Anglo-Saxon England 15.73–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1991 “The world of Anglo-Saxon learning”. The Cambridge Companion to Old English Literature, ed. by M. Godden and M. Lapidge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 264–281. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Page, R. I.
1982 “The study of Latin texts in late Anglo-Saxon England, 2: the evidence of English glosses”, Latin and the Vernacular Languages in Early Medieval Britain, ed. by N. Brooks. Leicester: Leicester University Press, pp. 141–165.Google Scholar
Rigg, A. G. and G. R. Wieland
1975 “A Canterbury classbook of the mid-eleventh century (the ‘Cambridge Songs’ manuscript)”. Anglo-Saxon England 4.113–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saenger, Paul
1982 “Silent reading: its impact on late medieval script and society”. Viator 13.367–414. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scalia, Giuseppe
1966Salimbene de Adam: Cronica. 2 vols. Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Stevenson, W. H.
1929Early Scholastic Colloquies. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Wieland, G. R.
1983The Latin Glosses on Arator and Prudentius in Cambridge University Library MS Gg.5.35. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies.Google Scholar
1985 “The glossed manuscript: classbook or library book?Anglo-Saxon England 14.153–173. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zupitza, Julius
1880Aelfric’s Grammatik und Glossar. Berlin: Weidmann.Google Scholar