William Holder and other 17th-century phoneticians

David Abercrombie
Summary

In spite of inevitable deficiencies in their knowledge, 17th-century writers on phonetics can be said to have succeeded in laying the foundations of a true general phonetics. They include some famous names, such as John Wallis and Isaac Newton, but many of them have remained virtually unknown until comparatively recent times, in spite of having contributed significant insights. A brief mention is given here of the work of thirteen of these early writers on phonetics, followed by a fuller account of William Holder (1616–1698), probably the best phonetician of his time. He was not an orthoepist, nor was he concerned to describe the sounds of English. His book had a practical purpose – to provide a theoretical basis for techniques of teaching the deaf. Possible ambiguity in the 17th-century use of ‘letter’ is explained before examining Holder’s description of the sounds of speech. This includes his interesting use of the hylomorphic distinction between ‘matter’ and ‘form’. The description of vowels is almost inevitably less satisfactory than that of the consonants, but his phonetic terminology and general framework would not be out of place in a modern introduction to phonetics. He deserves more attention than he has received, both for his theoretical contribution and for his pioneering work in techniques of teaching the deaf.

Quick links
Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price. Direct PDF access to this article can be purchased through our e-platform.

References

Abercrombie, David
1948 “Forgotten Phoneticians”, Transactions of the Philological Society 1948.1–34. (Repr. in Abercrombie 1965:45–75.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1949 “What Is a ‘letter’?”. Lingua 2.54–63. (Repr. in Abercrombie 1965:76–85.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1965Studies in Phonetics and Linguistics. London: Oxford Univ. PressGoogle Scholar
1986 “Hylomorphic Taxonomy and William Holder”. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 16.4–7. (Repr. in Fifty Years in Phonetics: Selected papers by D. Abercrombie, 33–36. Edinburgh: Edinburgh Univ. Press 1991.)Google Scholar
Allen, W. Sidney
1953Phonetics in Ancient India. London: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Amman, Johann Conrad
1692Surdus Loquens. Amsterdam: Wetstein (Transl. into English by Daniel Foot as The Talking Deaf Man, London: T. Howkins 1694; facs. repr., Menston: Scolar Press 1972.)Google Scholar
1700Dissertatio de Loquela. Amsterdam: J. Wolters. (Transl. into English by Charles Baker as A Dissertation on Speech, London: Sampson Low, Marston, Low & Searle 1873; facs. repr., Amsterdam: North Holland 1965.)Google Scholar
Bell, Alexander Melville
1867Visible Speech. London: Simpkin, Marshall & Co.Google Scholar
Bulwer, John
1644Chirologia. London: T. Harper.Google Scholar
1648Philocophus. London: H. Moseley.Google Scholar
Cooper, Christopher
1685Grammatica Linguae Anglicanae. London. (Ed. by J. D. Jones, Halle/S.: Max Niemeyer 1911; facs. repr., Menston: Scolar Press 1968.)Google Scholar
1687The English Teacher. London: J. Richardson for the author. (Ed. by Bertil Sundby, Lund: Gleerup 1953; facs. repr., Menston: Scolar Press 1969.)Google Scholar
Cordemoy, Géraud de
1668Discours physique de la parole. Paris: Florentin Lambert. (English transl., A Philosophicall Discourse concerning Speech, London: John Martin 1668; repr. with an introduction by Karl D. Uitti, New York: AMS Press 1974.)Google Scholar
Daines, Simon
1640Orthoepia Anglicana. London. (Ed. by Martin Rösler & Rudolf Brotanek, Halle/S.: Max Niemeyer 1908; facs. repr., Menston: Scolar Press 1967.)Google Scholar
Dalgarno, George
1661Ars Signorum. London: J. Hayes. (Ed by Thomas Maitland, The Works of George Dalgarno of Aberdeen, Edinburgh: T. Constable 1834; facs. repr., Menston: Scolar Press 1968.)Google Scholar
1680Didascalocophus; Double Consonants. Oxford: at the Sheldonian. (Ed by Thomas Maitland, The Works of George Dalgarno of Aberdeen, Edinburgh: T. Constable 1834.)Google Scholar
Ekwall, Eilert
ed. 1907Dr. John Jones’s Practical Phonography (1701). Halle/S.: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Elliot, Ralph W. V.
1954 “Isaac Newton as a Phonetician”. Modern Language Review 49.5–12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, Alexander John
1869On Early English Pronunciation. Vol.I. London.: Asher & Co. for the Philological Society.Google Scholar
Firth, John Rupert
1946 “The English School of Phonetics”. Transactions of the Philological Society 1946 92–132. (Repr. in Papers in Linguistics 1934–1951 by J. R. Firth, 92–120. London: Oxford Univ. Press 1957.)Google Scholar
Haugen, Einar
ed. 1972First Grammatical Treatise. 2nd rev. ed. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Hjelmslev, Louis
1953Prolegomena to a Theory of Language. Transl. by Francis J. Whitfield. Baltimore: Waverly Press. (2nd rev. ed., Madison, Wis.: Univ. of Wisconsin Press 1961.)Google Scholar
Holder, William
1668 “An Experiment Concerning Deafness”. Philosophical Transactions.Google Scholar
1669Elements of Speech: An Essay of Inquiry into the Natural Production of Letters: with An Appendix concerning Persons Deaf and Dumb. London: T. N. for J. Martyn. (Facs. repr., Menston: Scolar Press 1967 Also repr., with an introd. by Robert W. Rieber & Jeffrey L. Wollock, New York: AMS Press 1975.)Google Scholar
Hulsker, Jos L. M.
1988 “Petrus Montanus as a Phonetician and a Theoretician”. HL 9:3.335–359. (Repr. in The History of Linguistics in the Low Countries ed. by Jan Noordegraaf, Kees Versteegh & Konrad Koerner, 85–108. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins 1992.)Google Scholar
Hume, Alexander
1617Of the Orthographic and Congruitie of the Britan Tongue. (Ed. from the original ms. in the British Museum by Henry B. Wheatley, London: Early English Text Society 1865.)Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto
1889The Articulations of Speech Sounds. Marburg: N. G. Elwert.Google Scholar
Jones, John
1701Practical Phonography. London: Richard Smith. [See Ekwall 1907.]Google Scholar
Kemp, J. Alan
1972John Wallis’s Grammar of the English Language. With translation and commentary. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter
1967 “The Nature of Vowel Quality”. Three Areas of Experimental Phonetics by P. Ladefoged, 50–142. London: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Montanus, Petrus
1635De Spreeckonst. Delft: Jan Pietersz Waalpot. (Ed. by Willem J. H. Caron, Groningen: L.J.B. Wolters 1964.)Google Scholar
Robinson, Robert
1617The Art of Pronuntiation. London: Nicholas Okes. (Ed. by Eric John Dobson, The Phonetic Writings of Robert Robinson, London: Oxford Univ. Press 1957.)Google Scholar
Salmon, Vivian
1972The Works of Francis Lodwick. London: Longman.Google Scholar
1988[1979]The Study of Language in 17th-Century England. 2nd ed. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, Barbara J.
1969John Wilkins: 1614–1672. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, R. Scott & Douglas Guthrie
1949A History of Oto-laryngology. Edinburgh: Livingstone.Google Scholar
Subbiondo, Joseph L.
1978 “William Holder’s Elements of Speech (1669): A study of applied English phonetics and speech therapy”. Lingua 46:169–184. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1987 “John Wilkins’ Theory of Articulatory Phonetics”. Papers in the History of Linguistics: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on the History of the Language Sciences (ICHoLS III), Princeton, 19–23 August 1984 ed. by Hans Aarsleff, Louis G. Kelly & Hans-Josef Niederehe, 263–270. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
ed. 1992John Wilkins and 17th-Century British Linguistics. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sweet, Henry
1908The Sounds of English. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Vos, Andries A.
1962Tradition and Innovation in Petrus Montanus, The Art of Speech, 1635. Ph.D. thesis, Edinburgh Univ.Google Scholar
Walker, John
1791A Critical Pronouncing Dictionary and Expositor of the English Language. London: G.G.J. and J. Robinson and T. Cadell.Google Scholar
Wallis, John
1653Grammatica Linguae Anglicanae. Oxford: L. Lichfield. (Facs. repr., Menston: Scolar Press 1969; see also Kemp 1972.)Google Scholar
1678A Defence of the Royal Society. London: T. S. for Thomas Moore.Google Scholar
Wilkins, John
1668An Essay towards a Real Character, and a Philosophical Language. London: for Sa. Gellibrand, and for John Martyn. (Facs. repr. Menston: Scolar Press 1968.)Google Scholar
Wyld, Henry Cecil
1953A History of Modern Colloquial English. 3rd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar