Johann Joachim Becher (1635–1682), a little known opponent of Comenius’ Theory of Language and Language Learning

Werner Hüllen
Universität Essen
Summary

Concerning the methods of language teaching, Johann Joachim Becher (1635–1682), one of the encyclopedic philosophers of the 17th century, stood in opposition to Jan Amos Comenius (1592–1670), the pedagogue of Europewide influence. He published Methodus didactica (1668) and Novum organon (1672), the latter being a universal nomenclator as they were popular in the 17th century. This nomenclator is organised according to Aristotelian categories which Becher saw expressed in word-classes. It assembles groups of synonyms in Latin and German under headwords which were taken as the simple notions, i.e., the building-blocks, of the human mind. Becher demanded didactic principles to be developed out of these linguistic assumptions. Whereas Comenius shaped his teaching methods according to the situational learning abilities of the individual, Becher regarded them as being dominated by the structures of language seen as structures of the mind, thus foreshadowing Cartesian thinking.

Quick links
Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price. Direct PDF access to this article can be purchased through our e-platform.

References

A.Primary sources

Joannis Joachimi Becheri Spirensis, […] NOVUM ORGANUM PHILOLOGICUM Pro Verborum Copia in quavis Materia acquirenda, Das ist: Neuer Werkzeug Der Wohlredenheit / Worinnen Von jeder Sach zu reden Wörter gnugsam erfunden werden können
Editio secunda Paragraphorum distinctione & versione Germanica adaucta. Cum Privilegio & Censura. Francoftirti ad Maenum Impensis Joan. Davidis Zunneri. Typis Wendelini MÖwalti M DC lxxiv.
Joannis Joachimi Becheri Spirensis, Sacrae Caesareae Majestatis Consiliarii, […]/Methodus Didactica Seu Clavis ET Praxis Super Novum Suum Organon Philologicum
, Das ist: Gründlicher Beweis / daß die Weg und Mittel / welche die Schulen bißhero ins gemein gebraucht / die Jugend zu Erlernung der Sprachen / insonderheit der Lateinischen / zu füren / nicht gewiß / noch sicher seyen / sondern den Regulen und Natur der rechten Lehr / und Lern-Kunst schnurstracks entgegen lauffen / derentwegen nicht allein langweilig / sondern auch gemeiniglich unfruchtbar / und vergeblich ablauffen: Samt Anleitung zu einem besseren. Zweyte Edition. Franckfurt / in Verlag Johann Davis Zunners / Druckts Balthasar Christoph Wust/ 1674.Google Scholar
Nicodemi Frischlini NOMENCLATOR TRILINGVIS, GRAECO-LATINO-GERMA-NICUS, CONTInens omnium rerum, quae in probatis omnium doctrinarum auctoribus inueniuntur, appellationes: quarum aliquot millia nusquam sunt obuia
OPVS NOVA QVADAM METHODO, SECVNDVM CATHEGORIAS ARIS-TOTElis, non sine labore maximo concinnatum. ET QVARTO IAM, NOVA VOCABVLORVM GERMANICORVM HISCE IN REGIOnibus vsi tatotum accessione, te cognitum, atqua a mendis omnibus diligentissime repurgatum. Cum Gratia & Pruilegio Caesareae Maiestatis. FRANCOFVRTI AD MOENVM, EXcudebat Wolffgangus Richter, Impensis Ioannis Spiessij. ANNO M. DC.

B.Secondary sources

Breger, Herbert
1993 “Becher, Leibniz und die Rationalität”. Frühsorge & Strasser 1993.69–84.Google Scholar
Frühsorge, Gotthardt & Gerhard F. Strasser
eds. 1993Johann Joachim Becher (1635–1682). (= Wolfenbütteler Arbeiten zur Barockforschung, 22.) Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Hassinger, Herbert
1951Johann Joachim Becher, 1635–1687: Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte des Merkantilismus. Wien: A. Holzhausens Nachf.Google Scholar
Hüllen, Werner
1992 “Speculative Lexicography: Difficulties in Following the Historical Path of a Linguistic Idea”. Diversions of Galway: Papers on the History of Linguistics from ICHoLS V ed. by Anders Ahlqvist, 17–26. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
ed. 1994The World in a List of Words. (= Lexicographica; Series maior, 58.) Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schaller, Klaus
1990 “Johann Joachim Becher: Ein Beitrag zur Problemgeschichte der Pädagogik”. Zwanzig Jahre Comeniusforschung in Bochum, 225–244. St. Augustin: Academia Verlag.Google Scholar
1993 “Die Pädagogik des Johann Joachim Becher: Psychosophia contra Pan sophiam”. Frühsorge & Strasser 1993.197–213.Google Scholar
1994 “Die Kritik des Johann Joachim Becher an der ‘Janua linguarum’ des J. A. Comenius”. Hüllen 1994.159–166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slaughter, Mary M.
1982Universal Languages and Scientific Taxonomy in the Seventeenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Subirats-Rüggeberg, Carlos
1994 “Grammar and Lexicon in Traditional Grammar: The work of Matthias Kramer and Johann Joachim Becher”. Historiographia Linguistica 21:3.297–350. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strasser, Gerhard F.
1993 “Johann Joachim Bechers Universalsprachen-entwurf im Kontext seiner Zeit”. Frühsorge & Strasser 1993.215–232.Google Scholar
Teich, Mikulávs
1993 “Interdisciplinarity in J. J. Becher’s Thought”. Frühsorge & Strasser 1993.23–40.Google Scholar