Mikołaj Kruszewski and 20th-century linguistics

Fedor Mixajlovič Berezin
Summary

The article deals with important issues in general linguistic theory discussed by Mikołaj Habdank Kruszewski alias Nikolaj Vjačeslavovič Kruševskij (1851–1887), in the author’s view an unjustly forgotten linguist of genius of the late 19th century, who could be seen as standing at the roots of the 20th-century structuralism, long before the appearance of F. de Saussure’s lectures on general linguistics. In his major book O čerk nauki o jazyke (An outline of the science of language) of 1883, Kruszewski conceived of language as a system of signs, laying stress on the semiotic function of language. His understanding of sound alternation is in many ways close to modern principles of phonology and morphonology. His hypothesis of the universal character of the sound laws too anticipated the discovery of language universals. As a result, the author agrees with Radwańska-Williams’ (1993) characterization of Kruszewski’s theory as ‘a lost paradigm’ in the history of linguistics. Well-known linguists of the 20th century such as Roman Jakobson (1896–1982), Jerzy Kuryłowicz (1895–1978) , and others rightly argued that Kruszewski was one of the founders of modern linguistic theory.

Quick links
Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price. Direct PDF access to this article can be purchased through our e-platform.

References

Anan’ev, Boris Gerasimovič
1947Očerki istorii russkoj psixologii XVIII i XIX vekov [Sketches of the history of the Russian psychology in the 18th and 19th centuries]. Moskva: Učpedgiz.Google Scholar
Boduèn de Kurtenè, I[van] A[leksandrovič] (= Baudouin de Courtenay, Jan)
1881Podrobnaja programma lekcij v 1877/78 učebnom godu [A detailed program of lectures for the academic year 1877–1878]. Kazan & Warsaw.Google Scholar
1963Izbrannye trudy po obščemu jazykoznaniju [Selected works in general linguistics]. Ed. by V[iktor] P. Grigor’ev & A[leksej] A. Leont’ev, 2 vols. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Akademii Nauk.Google Scholar
Collinder, Björn
1962Les origines du structuralisme. (= Acta Universitatis Uppsaliensis; Nova Series 1:1.) Stockholm-Göteborg-Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Deese, James
1965The Structure of Associations in Language and Thought. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Godel, Robert
1957Les sources manuscrites du ‘Cours de linguistique générale’ de F. de Saussure. Geneva: Droz.Google Scholar
Guxman, M[irra] M[oiseevna]
1964 “Istoričeskie i metodologičeskie osnovy strukturalisma [Historical and methodological grounds of structuralism]”. Osnovnye napravlenia strukturalisma [Main trends in structuralism], 5–45. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo “Nauka”.Google Scholar
Jagić, V[atroslav]
1983Korrespondencija Vatroslava Jagića. Vol.III. Zagreb: Jugoslavenska Akademija Znanosti i Umjetnosti.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman
1971Selected Writings. Vol.II: Word and Language. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
1985Izbrannye raboty [Selected writings]. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo “Progress”.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. & Krystyna Pomorska
1983Dialogues. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kilbury, James
1976The Development of Morphophonemic Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koerner, Konrad
1989Practicing Linguistic Historiography. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kruszewski, Mikołaj Habdank
1881a “K voprosu o gune: Issledovanie v oblasti staroslavjanskogo vokalizma [On the question of the ‘guna’: A study in the domain of Old Slavic vocalism]”. Russkij filologičeskij vestnik 5.1.1–109.Google Scholar
1881bUeber die Lautabwechslung. Kazan: Universitätsbuchdruckerei. (English transl. by Robert Austerlitz in Kruszewski 1995.5–34.)Google Scholar
1883Očerk nauki o jazyke [An outline of the science of language]. Kazan: Tipografia Imperatorskago Universiteta. (English transl. by Gregory M. Eramian in Kruszewski 1995.43–172.)Google Scholar
1891 “Očerki po jazykovedeniju. 1: Francuzskaja grammatika [Essays in linguistics: French grammar]”. Posmertnoe izdanie s predisloviem i pod redakciej Prof. V. A. Bogorodickogo. Russkij Filologićeskij Vestnik 28:2.253–271, 28:4.173–186 (1891) [This and the following 2 entries were posthumously published by V[asilij] A[lekseevič] Bogorodickij, together with an introduction by him (248–252).]Google Scholar
1892–1894 “Očerki po jazykovedeniju. 2: Antropofonika [Essays in linguistics: Anthropophon(et)ics]”. Russkij Filologičeskij Vestnik 28:4.266–290 (1892); 29.332 (1893), and 31:1/2.66–83 (1894) [This and the subsequent item also appeared separately, Očerki po jazykovedeniju (Warsaw: Tipografija Varšavskago Učebnago Okruga 1893), 48 pp.Google Scholar
1894[1880] “Očerki po jazykovedeniju: Pribavlenie. Predmet, delenie i metod nauki o jazyke [Essays in linguistics. Supplement: The subject, division and method of the science of language]”. Russkij Filologičeskij Vestnik 31:1/2.84–90. [Appendix to Kruszewski 1892–1894.] (Repr. in Istorija jazykoznanija XIX i XX vekov v očerkax i izvlečenijax [History of linguistics in the 19th and 20th centuries in sketches and extracts] ed. by V[ladimir] A[ndreevič] Zvegincev, 3rd enl. ed., vol.I, 284–289. Moscow: Izd. “Prosveščcenie” 1964, and in Xrestomatija po istorii russkogo jazykoznanija ed. by F[edor] P[etrovič] Filin, 412–417. Moscow: Vysšaja škola 1973, and in the 2nd ed., prepared by F[edor] M[ixajlovič] Berezin 1977, pp.376–381.)Google Scholar
1995[1881b, 1883]Writings in General Linguistics: On Vocalic Aternations; An Outline of Linguistic Science. Ed., with an introduction, by Konrad Koerner. (= Amsterdam Classics in Linguistics, 1800–1925, 11.) Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuryłowicz, Jerzy
1960Esquisses linguistiques. [I]. Wrocław & Kraków: Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich. Wydawnictwo Polskiej Akad. Nauk.Google Scholar
Leont’ev, A[leksej] A[lekseevič]
1968 “Predislovie [Foreword]”. Očerki po istorii jazykoznanija v Rossii (konec XIX – načalo XX v.) [Sketches in the history of linguistics in Russia (end of the 19th – beginning of the 20th century)] by F. M. Berezin, 3–24. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo “Nauka”.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart
1843A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive; being a connected view of the principles of evidence and the methods of scientific investigation. London: Parker. (6th ed. in two vols., vol.I, London: Longmans, Green & Co. 1865.)Google Scholar
Polivanov, E[vgenij] D[mitrievič]
1968Stat’ipo obščemu jazykoznaniju [Articles in general linguistics]. Moskva: Izdatel’stvo “Glavnaja redakcija vostočnoj literatury”.Google Scholar
Potebnja, A[leksandr] A[fanas’evič]
1881 “A. V. Popov: Nekrolog [Obituary]”. Aleksandr Vasil’evič Popov, Sintaksičeskie issledovanija [Syntactic studies], i–ii. Voronež: V. I. Isaeva.Google Scholar
Ščerba, L[ev] V[ladimirovič]
1957[1929] “I. A. Boduèn de Kurtenè i ego značenie v nauke o jazyke [J. Baudouin de Courtenay and his significance in the science of language]”. Izbrannye trudy po russkomu jazyku [Selected writings on the Russian language], 85–96. Moscow: Učpedgiz.Google Scholar
1974[1930] “I. A. Boduèn de Kurtenè: Nekrolog [J. Baudouin de Courtenay: Obituary]”. Jazykovaja sistema i rečevaja dejatel’nost [Language system and speech activity] by L. V. Ščerba, 381–394. Leningrad: Izdatel’stvo “Nauka”.Google Scholar
Radwańska-Williams, Joanna
1993A Paradigm Lost: The linguistic theory of Mikołaj Kruszewski. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Sommerfeit, Alf
1961 “The French School of Linguistics”. Trends in European and American Linguistics: 1930–1960 ed. by Christine Mohrmann, Alf Sommerfelt & Joshua Whatmough, 283–293. Utrecht & Antwerp: Spectrum.Google Scholar
Troickij, M[atvei] M[ixajlovič]
. Logika [Logic]. A course of lectures of from the academic year 1883/84Moscow: Section of Rare Books, Russian National Library.Google Scholar
Ufimceva, A[nna] A[mfilof’evna]
1961 “Teorii ‘semantičeskogo polja’ i vozmožnosti ix primenenija pri izučenii slovarnogo sostava jazyka [The theories of the ‘semantic field’ and the possibility of their use while studying the vocabulary of the language]”. Voprosy teorii jazyka v sovremennoj zarubečnoj lingvistikie [Problems of the theory of language in modern linguistics abroad] , 30–63. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo “Nauka”.Google Scholar