Book review
Language and Its Functions: A historico-critical study of views concerning the functions of language from the pre-humanistic philology of Orleans to the rationalistic philology of Bopp By Pieter A. VerburgPaul Salmon. in consultation with Anthony J. Klijnsmit. in consultation with Jan Noor-degraaf ( Amsterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science; Series III: Studies in the History of the Language Sciences, 84).
Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1998. xxxiv, 582 pp.

Reviewed by Paul T. Roberge
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Quick links
Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price. Direct PDF access to this article can be purchased through our e-platform.

References

Abraham, Werner
ed. 1975U t videam: Contributions to an understanding of linguistics for Pieter Verbürg on the occasion of his 70th birthday. Lisse/Holland: Peter de Ridder Press.Google Scholar
Bühler, Karl
1934Sprachtheorie: Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. Jena: Gustav Fischer.Google Scholar
Bursill-Hall, Geoffrey Leslie
ed. 1972Thomas of Erfurt, Grammatica speculativa. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Faithfull, R. G[lyn]
1955 Review of Verbürg (1952) Archivum Linguisticum 7. 144–150.Google Scholar
Hymes, Dell
ed. 1974Studies in the History of Linguistics: Traditions and paradigms. Bloomington & London: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Stutterheim, C[ornelis]. F. P.
1941Het begrip metaphoor: Een taalkundig en wijs-gerig onderzoek. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam.) Amsterdam: H. J. Paris.Google Scholar
Verbürg, Pieter A.
1952T aal en functionaliteit: Een historisch-er itische Studie over de opvattingen aangaande de functies der taal vanaf de prae-humanistische Philologie van Orleans tot de rationalistische linguistiek van Bopp. Wageningen: H. Veenman & Zonen.Google Scholar
1974 “Vicissitudes of Paradigms”. Hymes 1974.191–230.Google Scholar
Verhaar, John W. M.
1989 “In memoriam Pieter A. Verburg”. Studies in Language 13.253–255. DOI logoGoogle Scholar