Structuralism, contextualism, dialogism: Volo.Inov’s and Baxtin’s contributions to the debate about the ‘relativity’ of meaning

Brigitte Nerlich

Summary

In the 1930s lexical semantics came under the influence of Saussurean structuralism and Gestalt psychology. The study of whole lexical fields and the structure of these fields replaced a historical semantics focusing on single words and the classification of the transitions between the meanings of these words over time according to different sets of criteria. At the same time contextualism, the study of meaning in its pragmatic context of language use, began to attract the attention of linguists, philosophers, and psychologists of language. Fully aware of the emergence of structuralism and contextualism, Volo‰inov and Baxtin began to develop their theories of meaning, society and literature, later called dialogism. All three movements dealt with the relativity of meaning, as relativity in a semantic field, as relativity in social context, and as relativity in social interaction and dialogue. This article demonstrates how, in a sometimes hidden dialogue with their Western contemporaries, Valentin Nikolaeviã Volo‰inov (1895–1936) and Mixail Mixajloviã Baxtin (1895–1975) developed new ‘relativistic’ theories of meaning, novel theories of pragmatics (speech acts), and modern theories of verbal interaction.

Quick links
Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price. Direct PDF access to this article can be purchased through our e-platform.

References

Bakhtin [Baxtin], Mikhael [Mixail] M[ixajloviã]
1973[1929]Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics. Translation of second edition. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Karoma.Google Scholar
1979Estitika slovesnogo tvorãestva [The aesthetics of verbal creativity]. Moscow: Iskusstvo.Google Scholar
1981[1934/35] “Discourse in the Novel”. The Dialogic Imagination. Four essays ed. by Michael Holquist (transl. by Caryl Emerson & Michael Holquist), 259–422. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
1986[1952/53] “The Problem of Speech Genres”. Speech Genres and Other Late Essays ed. by Caryl Emerson & Michael Holquist (transl. by Vern W. McGee), 60–102. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
1993[1986]Toward a Philosophy of the Act. Transl. and notes by V. Liapunov; ed. by Michael Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
1996Sobranie soãinenii [Collected writings]. Vol.V. Moscow: Russkie slovari.Google Scholar
Barnard, F. M.
ed. 1969J. G. Herder On Social and Political Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dentith, Simon
1995Bakhtinian Thought: An introductory reader. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Dewey, John
1929[1925.]Experience and Nature. 3rd ed. London: Allen & Unwin. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Erdmann, Karl Otto
1910[1900]Die Bedeutung des Wortes: Aufsätze aus dem Grenzgebiet der Sprachpsychologie und Logik. 2. Aufl. Leipzig: Avenarius. (4th ed. 1925.)Google Scholar
Firth, John Rupert
1957[1935] “The Use and Distribution of Certain English Sounds”. Papers in Linguistics 1934–51, 34–46. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
1964[1937/1930]The Tongues of Men & Speech. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gardiner, (Sir) Alan Henderson
1951[1932]The Theory of Speech and Language. 2nd ed., with additions [pp.328–344]. Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Repr. 1963.)Google Scholar
Grübel, Rainer
1998 “Der Russische Formalismus”. Semiotik/Semiotics: Ein Handbuch zu den zeichentheoretischen Grundlagen von Natur und Kultur/A Handbook on the Sign-Theoretic Foundations of Nature and Culture ed. by Roland Posner, Kurt Robering & Thomas A. Sebeok, vol.II, 2233–2248. Berlin & New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Halliday, M[ichael] A. K.
1975 “Language as Social Semiotic: Towards a general sociolinguistic theory”. The First LACUS Forum. Ed. by Adam Makkai & Valerie Becker Makkai, 17–46. Columbia, S.C.: The Hornbeam Press.Google Scholar
Herder, Johann Gottfried
1772Abhandlung über den Ursprung der Sprache. Leipzig: Voss.Google Scholar
Holquist, Michael
1990Dialogism: Bakhtin and his world. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J.
1998 “Emergent Grammar”. The New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure ed. by Michael Tomasello, 155–175. Mahwah, N.J. & London: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Hülzer-Vogt, Heike
1993 “Réflexions sémantiques d’un romaniste: Léo Spitzer (1887–1960) sur le changement de sens”. Histoire Épistémologie Langage 15:1. 111–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Humboldt, Wilhelm von
1963[1827] “Ueber den Dualis”. Werke in Fünf Bänden ed. by Andreas Flitner & Klaus Giel, Bd. III: Schriften zur Sprachphilosophie, 113–143. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
1988[1836]On Language: The diversity of human language-structure and its influence on the mental development of mankind. Transl. by Peter Heath. Introduction by Hans Aarsleff. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jäger, Ludwig
1975Zu einer Rekonstruktion der authentischen Sprach-Idee Ferdinand de Saussures. Dissertation, Universität Düsseldorf.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman
1957Shifters, Verbal Categories, and the Russian Verb. Cambridge, Mass.: Department of Slavic Languages and Literature, Russian Language Project, Harvard University.Google Scholar
1972 “Verbal Communication”. Scientific American 227:3.72–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, Otto
1922Language. Its Nature, Development and Origin. London: Allen & Unwin; New York: Henry Holt & Co.Google Scholar
Lähteenmäki, Mika
1998a “On Meaning and Understanding: A dialogical approach”. Dialogism 1.74–91.Google Scholar
1998b “On Dynamics and Stability: Saussure, Voloshinov, and Baxtin”. Dialogues on Baxtin: Interdisciplinary readings ed. by Mika Lähteenmaki & Hannele Dufva, 51–70. Jyväskylä, Finland: Centre for Applied Language Studies, University of Jyväskylä.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C.
1983Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malinowski, Bronislaw
1953[1923] “The Problem of Meaning in Primitive Languages”. Charles K. Ogden & Ivor A. Richards, The Meaning of Meaning. Supplement I [= pp.296–336]. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co; London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Mead, George Herbert
1934Mind, Self, and Society: From the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Edited with an introduction by Charles W. Morris. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Meillet, Antoine
1905 “Comment les mots changent de sens”. Année sociologique 9:230–271. (Repr. in Linguistique historique et linguistique générale I, 230–271. Paris: Champion 1921.)Google Scholar
Morson, Gary Saul
1998 “Bakhtin, Mikhail Mikhailovich (1895–1975)”. Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy ed. by Edward Craig et al., vol. I, 638b–645b. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mueller-Vollmer, Kurt
1992 “Wilhelm von Humboldt’s Introduction to the Kawi Language”. Semiotica 93:1/2.125–144. [Review Article on Humboldt 1988.]Google Scholar
Nerlich, Brigitte
1990Change in Language: Whitney, Bréal and Wegener. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
1992Semantic Theories in Europe, 1830–1930. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nerlich, Brigitte & David D. Clarke
1995 “The 1930s – at the Birth of a Pragmatic Conception of Language”. HL 22:3.311–334. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1996Language, Action, and Context: The early history of prag matics in Europe and America, 1780–1930. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1999 “Humboldt, Wilhelm von”. Handbook of Pragmatics ed. by Jef Verschueren, Jan-Ola Östman, Jan Blommaert & Chris Bulcaen, 1–14. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
In press. “Semantic Fields and Frames: Historical explorations at the interface between language, action, and cognition”. Journal of Pragmatics.
Nyrop, Kristoffer
1913Sémantique. [= Vol. IV of his Grammaire historique de la langue française]. Copenhagen: Gyldendalske Boghandel.Google Scholar
Pateman, Trevor
1989 “Pragmatics in Semiotics: Bakhtin/Volosinov”. Journal of Literary Semantics 18:3.203–216.Google Scholar
Paul, Hermann
1880Principien der Sprachgeschichte. Halle/Saale: Max Niemeyer. (2nd rev. ed. 1886; 5th ed. 1920.)Google Scholar
Paulhan, Frédéric
1886 “Le langage intérieur et la pensée”. Revue Philosophique 21.26–58.Google Scholar
1927 “La double fonction du langage”. Revue Philosophique 104.22–73.Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand de
1916Cours de linguistique générale. Éd. par Charles Bally et Albert Sechehaye, avec la collaboration de Albert Riedlinger. Paris & Lausanne: Payot. (3rd, corrected ed. 1931.)Google Scholar
Schmitter, Peter
1987Das sprachliche Zeichen. Münster: Nodus.Google Scholar
Shotter, John & Michael Billig
1998 “A Bakhtinian Psychology: From out of the heads of individuals and into the dialogues between them”. Bakhtin and the Human Sciences ed. by Michael Gardiner & Michael Mayerfeld Bell, 3–29. London: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vassilyev, Leon
1974 “The Theory of Semantic Fields”. Linguistics 137.79–93.Google Scholar
Voloshinov [Volo‰inov], V[alentin] N[ikolaeviã]
1983[1926] “Discourse in Life and Discourse in Poetry: Questions of sociological poetics”. Bakhtin School Papers ed. by Ann Shukman, 5–30. Oxford: RPT Publications in association with Dept. of Literature, University of Essex; Oxford: Distributed by Holdan Books.Google Scholar
1986[1929]Marxism and the Philosophy of language. Transl. from the Russian by Ladislav Matejka & I. R. Titunik. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, Lev Semanovitch
1962[1934]Thought and Language. Translated by Gertrud Vakar & Eugenia Hanfmann. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wegener, Philipp
1991[1885]Untersuchungen über die Grundfragen des Sprachlebens. Halle/Saale: Max Niemeyer. (New ed. prepared by E. F. K. Koerner, with an introduction by Clemens Knobloch, Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins 1991.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1902 Review of Berthold Delbrück, Grundfragen der Sprachforschung mit Rücksicht auf W. Wundts Sprachpsychologie erörtert. (Strassburg: Karl J. Trübner 1901) Literarisches Centralblatt Nr. 12 (22 March 1902).cols 401–410.Google Scholar
Weisgerber, Leo
1927 “Die Bedeutungslehre: Ein Irrweg der Sprachwissenschaft?Germanisch Romanische Monatsschrift 15.161–183.Google Scholar