The legacy of J. R. Firth: A report on recent research

Victoria Rebori
London
Summary

The present paper is a report on research on the British linguist John Rupert Firth (1890–1960) carried out in Britain during the academic year 2000–2001. It sketches some characteristics of Firth’s personality, scholarly life and thinking based on two kinds of different sources: the testimonies of people who were close to him and recently found historical documents. The main contribution of this paper is to furnish fresh data about Firth’s biography with particular reference to the question of how he became interested in the science of language.

Quick links
Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price. Direct PDF access to this article can be purchased through our e-platform.

References

Abercrombie, David
1937 Isaac Pitman.A pioneer in the scientific study of language. London: Sir Isaac Pitman & Sons.Google Scholar
Allen, W[illiam] S[idney]
1953 Phonetics in Ancient India. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, Thomas
1882 History of Shorthand; with a review of its present condition and prospects in Europe and America. London: Allen & Co.Google Scholar
Blunt, Edward
1937 The I.C.S. Indian Civil Service. London: Faber & Faber.Google Scholar
Carnochan, Jack
1961 “John Rupert Firth”. Le Maître Phonetique No.115.2–3.Google Scholar
Collins, Beverley & Inger M. Mees
1999 The Real Professor Higgins: The life and career of Daniel Jones. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Firth, J[ohn] R[upert]
1930 Speech. (= Benn’s Sixpenny Library, 121.) London: Ernest Benn, 79 pp. (Repr. – together with Firth [1937] – as The Tongues of Men and Speech ed. by Peter Strevens, 139–211. London: Oxford University Press 1964.)Google Scholar
Firth, J. R.
1937 The Tongues of Men. London: Watts & Co., vii, 160 pp. (Repr., together with Firth 1930, in Firth 1964.1–138.)Google Scholar
1946 “The English School of Phonetics”. Transactions of the Philological Society 1946.92–132. (Repr. in Firth 1957a.7–33.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1948 “Sounds and Prosodies”. Transactions of the Philological Society 1948.127–152. (Repr. in Firth 1957a.121–139.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1949 “Atlantic Linguistics”. Archivum Linguisticum 1:2.95–116. (Repr. in Firth 1957a.156–172.)Google Scholar
1952 Preliminary Reports for the Seventh Linguistic Congress, London 1952, pp. 5–9.Google Scholar
1956 “Presidential Address”.Transactions of the Philological Society 1956.1–25. (Repr. in Firth 1968: 53–73.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1957a Papers in Linguistics 1934–51. London – New York – Toronto: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
1957b “Ethnographic Analysis andLanguage with Reference to Malinowski’s Views”. Man and Culture: An evaluation of the work of Bronislaw Malinowski ed. by Raymond W. Firth, 93–118. London: Oxford University Press. (Repr. in Firth 1968: 137–167.)Google Scholar
1964 The Tongues of Men and Speech. London: Oxford University Press. [Reprint of Firth 1937 and 1930; with a Preface by Peter Strevens, pp. vii–x.]Google Scholar
1968 Selected Papers of John Rupert Firth (1952–1959). Ed. by F. R. Palmer. London: Longman; Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Haas, William
1956–1958 “Of Living Things”. German Life and Letters 10:1.62–69; 11.85–96; 12.251–257. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koerner, E. F. K.
1999 “J. R. Firth and the Cours de linguistique générale: A historiographical sketch”. Linguistic Historiography: Projects & prospects by Koerner, 155–166. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001 “R. H. Robins, J. R. Firth, andLinguistic Historiography”. Henry Sweet Society Bulletin 36.5–11.Google Scholar
Malinowski, Bronislaw
1923 “The Problem of Meaning in Primitive Societies”. The Meaning of Meaning by C. K.Ogden & I. A. Richards, Supplement I, 451–510. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Mitchell, T[erence] F[rederik]
1957 The Language of Buying and Selling in Cyrenaica: A situational statement. Hesperis. University of Rabat. (Repr. in Mitchell 1975: 167–201.)Google Scholar
Mitchell, T. F.
1975 Principles of Firthian linguistics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Pitman, Isaac
1891 A History of Shorthand. 3rd ed. Bath: Phonetic Institute; London: Pitman & Sons.Google Scholar
Robins, R[obert] H[enry]
1951 Ancient and Mediaeval grammatical theory in Europe; with particular reference to modern linguistic doctrine. London: Bell & Sons.Google Scholar
Robins, R. H.
1961 “John Rupert Firth”. Language 37.191–201.Google Scholar
1971 “Malinowski, Firth and ‘The context of situation’”. Social Anthropology and Language (= Monographs of the Association of Social Anthropologists 10), 33–46. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
1997a “‘ Ask not for whom the bells tolls, it tolls for thee’: General linguistics, the history of linguistics, andthe responsibilities of language students”. Interview with Pierre Swiggers. Orbis 39.181–207. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1997b “The Contribution of J. R. Firth to the first fifty years of Lingua ”. Lingua 100.205–222. (Repr. in Selected Papers on the History of Linguistics: Texts and contexts by R. H. Robins, ed. by Vivien Law, 286–310. Münster: Nodus 1998.)Google Scholar
Scott, N[orman] C[arson]
1961 “John Rupert Firth”. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 24.413–418. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sweet, Henry
1892 A Manual of Current Shorthand, orthographic and phonetic. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig
1979 Remarks on Frazer’s Golden Bough. Original German text and English translation by A. C. Miles, revised by Rush Rhees. Retford: The Brymill Press.Google Scholar