The problem of Joseph Priestley’s (1733–1804) descriptivism

Jane Hodson
University of Sheffield
Summary

Joseph Priestley’s (1733–1804) Rudiments of English Grammar (1761, second revised edition 1768) has often been interpreted as demonstrating that, unlike most 18th-century grammarians, Priestley took a descriptive approach towards the study of language. This article argues that such a characterisation both of Priestley’s work and that of his contemporaries is misleading. The article offers a reappraisal of Priestley’s Grammar, demonstrating that the idea of linguistic perfectibility is central to his linguistic ideas, but that it has often been overlooked by modern commentators. The two editions of Priestley’s Grammar are assessed, and it is argued that the substantial alterations that he makes for the second edition reveal a grammarian struggling to bring order to the study of the English language.

Quick links
Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price. Direct PDF access to this article can be purchased through our e-platform.

References

Aitchison, Jean
1981 Language Change: Progress or decay? London: Fontana.Google Scholar
Anon
1797 “Review of William Godwin, The Enquirer ”. Monthly Review, New Series 23.291–301.Google Scholar
Azad, Yusef
1989 The Government of Tongues: Common usage and the ‘prescriptive’ tradition 1650–1800. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Barrell, John
1983 English Literature in History 1780–1830: An equal, wide survey. London: Hutchison.Google Scholar
Baugh, Albert C[roll] & Thomas Cable
1993 [3 1978] A History of the English Language. 4th rev. ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Beal, Joan C.
1999 English Pronunciation in the Eighteenth Century: Thomas Spence’s ‘Grand Repository of the English Language (1775). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
2004 English in Modern Times. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Bevilacqua, Vincent M. & Richard Murphy
eds. 1965 “Introduction”. A Course of Lectures on Oratory and Criticism by Joseph Priestley. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Cameron, Deborah
1995 Verbal Hygiene. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Crowley, Tony
2003 Standard English and the Politics of Language. 2nd ed. revised. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. [1st ed. published under the title The Politics of Discourse, London: Macmillan 1989.]Google Scholar
Elledge, Scott
1967 “The Naked Science of Language”. Studies in Criticism and Aesthetics 1660–1800: Essays in honor of Samuel Holt Monk ed. by Howard Anderson & John S. Shea, 266–295. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Fenn, Ellenor
[1798?] The Mother’s Grammar. London: John Marshall.Google Scholar
Finegan, Edward
1998 “Chapter 6: English Grammar and Usage”. Cambridge History of the English Language, volume IV: 1776–1997 ed by Suzanne Romaine, 536–588. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Godwin, William
1793 An Enquiry Concerning Political Justice. 2 vols. London: G.G.J. & J. Robinson.Google Scholar
1797 “Of English Style”. The Enquirer: Reflections on education, manners and literature by William Godwin, 368–488. London: G.G.J. & J. Robinson.Google Scholar
Harris, Roy
1993 “Introduction”. Reprint of Course of Lectures on the Theory of Language and Universal Grammar by Joseph Priestley, v–xi. London: Routledge / Thoemmes Press.Google Scholar
Hoecker, James J.
1987 Joseph Priestley and the Idea of Progress. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Leonard, Sterling Andrus
1962 [1929] The Doctrine of Correctness in English Usage 1700–1800. New York: Russell & Russell.Google Scholar
Locke, Don
1980 A Fantasy of Reason: The life and thought of William Godwin. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
McIntosh, Carey
1998 The Evolution of English Prose, 1700–1800: Style, politeness, and print culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Michael, Ian
1970 English Grammatical Categories and the Tradition to 1800. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Linda C.
2001 Grammar Wars: Language as cultural battlefield in 17th and 18th century England. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Mugglestone, Lynda
2003 [1995] ‘Talking Proper’: The rise of accent as social symbol. 2nd rev. ed. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Percy, Carol
1994 “Paradigms for Their Sex? Women’s grammars in late eighteenth-century England”. Histoire Épistémologie Histoire 16:2.121–141.Google Scholar
Priestley, Joseph
1761 Rudiments of English Grammar; Adapted to the Use of Schools. with Observations on Style. London: R. Griffiths.Google Scholar
1762 A Course of Lectures on the Theory of Language and Universal Grammar. Warrington: W. Eyres. (Facs.-reprint, London: Routledge / Thoemmes Press 1993.)Google Scholar
1768 The Rudiments of English Grammar, Adapted to the Use of Schools; with Notes and Observations for the use of those who have made some Proficiency in the Language. 2nd edition revised. London: T. Becket, P. A. de Hondt & J. Johnson.Google Scholar
1772 A Course of Lectures on Oratory and Criticism. London: J. Johnson. (Facs.-reprint, Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press 1965.)Google Scholar
Rodriguez-Gil, Maria
2002 Teaching English Grammar in the Eighteenth Century: Ann Fisher. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Las Palmas, Tenerife.Google Scholar
Romaine, Suzanne
1998 “Introduction”. Cambridge History of the English Language, vol. IV: 1776–1997 ed. by Suzanne Romaine, 3–56. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand de
1974 [1916] Course in General Linguistics. Edited by Charles Bally and Albert Sechehaye in collaboration with Albert Riedlinger. Translated by Wade Baskin. London: Fontana.Google Scholar
Schofield, Robert E.
1997 The Enlightenment of Joseph Priestley: A study of his life and work from 1733 to 1773. College Park, Pa.: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Olivia
1986 The Politics of Language 1791–1819. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon. [1st ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press 1984.]Google Scholar
Sugg, Redding S. Jr.
1964 “The Mood of Eighteenth-Century English Grammar”. Philological Quarterly 43:2.239–252.Google Scholar
Swift, Jonathan
1712 A Proposal for Correcting, Improving, and Ascertaining the English Tongue in a Letter to the Most Honourable Robert Earl of Oxford and Mortimer, Lord High Treasurer of Great Britain. London: Benj. Tooke. (Facs.-reprint, Menston, Yorks.: Scolar Press 1969.)Google Scholar
Taylor, Talbot J.
1990 “Which Is to Be Master? The institutionalization of authority in the science of language”. Ideologies of Language ed. by John E. Joseph & Talbot J. Taylor, 9–26. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid
1996 “Lindley Murray and the Concept of Plagiarism”. Two Hundred Years of Lindley Murray ed. by Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade, 81–96. Münster: Nodus.Google Scholar
Wales, Katie
1996 “With Apologies to Lindley Murray: The narrative method of the ‘Eumaeus’ episode in Ulysses ”. Two Hundred Years of Lindley Murray ed. by Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade, 207–216. Münster: Nodus.Google Scholar
Williams, Gwyn A.
1989 Artisans and Sans-Culottes: Popular movements in France and Britain during the French Revolution. 2nd rev. ed. London: Libris. [1st ed., London: Arnold 1968.]Google Scholar