William Dwight Whitney and the Social Dimension of Lexical Diffusion

Stephen G. Alter
Gordon College
Summary

The paper traces how the American linguist William Dwight Whitney (1827–1894) and his intellectual descendants anticipated, and in part influenced, modern-day discussions of ‘lexical diffusion’, the piecemeal spread of phonological changes both through an individual speaker’s word-inventory and speaker-to-speaker through an entire community. Whitney regarded these two processes as inextricably linked; he also stressed comparison between different speech communities in search of locally distinct diffusionary patterns that challenged the Neogrammarian regularity hypothesis. Recent discussions of these and other aspects of lexical diffusion suggest that comparative-local studies, such as Whitney pioneered, remain essential for working out the explanatory nexus between lexical diffusion’s internally-phonological and social contexts.

Quick links
Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price. Direct PDF access to this article can be purchased through our e-platform.

References

Alter, Stephen G.
2005William Dwight Whitney and the Science of Language. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard
1933Language. New York: Henry Holt & Co.Google Scholar
Brugmann, Karl & Hermann Osthoff
1967 [1878] “Preface to Morphologische Untersuchungen auf dem Gebiete der indogermanischen Sprachen ”. Reader in Nineteenth-Century Historical Indo-European Linguistics ed. and transl. by Winfred P. Lehmann, 197–209. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Christy, Craig
1983Uniformitarianism in Linguistics. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Collinge, N[eville] E.
1994 “Historical Linguistics: History”. Encyclopedia of Languages and Linguistics ed. by R. E. Asher & J. M. Y. Simpson, vol. III, 1559–1567. Oxford & New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Delbrück, Bertold
1882 [1880]Introduction to the Study of Language. Transl. by Eva Channing [of Einleitung in das Studium der indogermanischen Sprachen]. Leipzig: Breitkopf & Härtel. (Repr., with an Introduction in English by Konrad Koerner, Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins 1974.)Google Scholar
1908Einleitung in das Studium der indogermanischen Sprachen. 5th ed. Leipzig: Breitkopf & Härtel.Google Scholar
Easton, Morton W[illiam]
1884 “Analogy and Uniformity”. American Journal of Philology 5.164–177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gleason, Henry Allan, Jr.
1955Introduction to Descriptive Linguistics. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Guy, Gregory R.
2003 “Variationist Approaches to Phonological Change”. The Handbook of Historical Linguistics ed. by Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda, 369–400. New York: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
H[errick], R[obert]
1943 “Tarbell, Frank Bigelow”. Dictionary of American Biography. Published under the auspices of the American Council of Learned Societies, vol. XVIII, p. 306. New York: C. Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
Hockett, Charles
1958A Course in Modern Linguistics. New York: Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, Otto
1922Language: Its nature, origin and development. London: G. Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Joseph, Brian D.
2001 “Is there Such a Thing as ‘grammaticalization’?”. Language Sciences 23.163–186. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Joseph, Brian D. & Richard D. Janda
2003 “Introduction”. The Handbook of Historical Linguistics ed. by Joseph & Janda, 3–180. New York: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul
1995, 2003 “The Phonological Basis of Sound Change”. Handbook of Phonological Theory ed. by John A. Goldsmith, 640–670. Oxford & Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell. (Repr. in The Handbook of Historical Linguistics ed. by Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda, 313–342. New York: Blackwell.)Google Scholar
Koerner, Konrad
ed. 1991First Person Singular II: Autobiographies by North American scholars in the language sciences. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koerner, E. F. K.
2002Toward a History of American Linguistics. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
2004 “The Place of Geology in W. D. Whitney’s Linguistic Argument”. Essays in the History of Linguistics by Koerner, 145–158. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 “Hermann Paul and General Linguistic Theory”. Language Sciences 30.102–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William
1972Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
1992 “Evidence for Regular Sound Change in English Dialect Geography”. History of Englishes: New methods and interpretations in historical linguistics ed. by Matti Rissanen, Ossi Ihalainen, Terttu Nevalainen & Irma Taavitsainen, 42–71. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1994Principles of Linguistic Change. Vol. I: Internal factors. Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lien, C[hienfa]
1994 “Lexical Diffusion”. The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics ed. by R. E. Asher & J. M. Y. Simpson, III, 2141–2144. Oxford & New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Malkiel, Yakov
1967 “Each Word Has a History of its Own”. Glossa 1.137–149.Google Scholar
Milroy, James
1991Linguistic Variation and Change: On the historical sociolinguistics of English. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Murray, Stephen O.
1983Group Formation in Social Science. Carbondale, Ill.: Linguistic Research, Inc. [A thoroughly revised edition appeared as Theory Groups and the Study of Language in North America: A social history (Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins 1994.)]Google Scholar
Nerlich, Brigitte
1990Change in Language: Whitney, Bréal, and Wegener. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ogura, Mieko
1995 “The Development of Middle English i and u: A reply to Labov (1992, 1994)”. Diachronica 12.31–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paley, William
1825 [1785]Principles of Moral and Political Philosophy. 11th American ed. Boston: Richardson & Lord.Google Scholar
Paul, Herman
1880Principien der Sprachgeschichte. Halle: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Pedersen, Holger
1931 [1924]The Discovery of Language: Linguistic science in the nineteenth century. Transl. by J[ohn] Webster Spargo [of Sprokvidenskapen i det Nittende Aarhundrede: Metoder och resultater]. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. (Repr., Bloomington: Indiana University Press 1962.]Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward
1921Language: An introduction to the study of speech. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co. (Repr. 1949.)Google Scholar
Schuchardt, Hugo
1972 [1885] “On Sound Laws: Against the Neogrammarians”. Transl. by Theo Vennemann & Terence H. Wilbur [of Über die Lautgesetze: Gegen die Junggrammatiker (Berlin: R. Oppenheim 1885] Schuchardt, the Neogrammarians, and the Transformational Theory of Phonological Change ed. by Theo Vennemann & Terence H. Wilbur, 39–72. Frankfurt am Main: Athenäum.Google Scholar
Sturtevant, Edgar H[oward]
1917Linguistic Change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Repr. 1962.)Google Scholar
Sturtevant, Edgar H.
1924 “Phonetic Law and Imitation”. Journal of the American Oriental Society 44:1.38–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1947An Introduction to Linguistic Science. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Tarbell, Frank B[igelow]
1886 “Phonetic Law”. Transactions of the American Philological Association 17.5–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, William S[hi]-Y[uan]
1969 “Competing Changes as a Cause of Residue”. Language 45: 1.9–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, William S.-Y.
ed. 1977The Lexicon in Phonological Change. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, William S. Y. & C. F. Lien
1993 “Bidirectional Diffusion in Sound Change”. Historical Linguistics: Problems and prospectives ed. by Charles Jones, 345–400, London: Longman.Google Scholar
Wardhaugh, Ronald
1986An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel, William Labov & Marvin Herzog
1968 “Empirical Foundations for a Theory of Language Change”. Directions for Historical Linguistics ed. by Winfred P. Lehmann & Yakov Malkiel, 97–195. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Wheeler, Benjamin Ide
1901 “The Causes of Uniformity in Phonetic Change”. Transactions of the American Philological Association 32.5–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Whitney, William Dwight
1867Language and the Study of Language. New York: Scribner & Co.Google Scholar
1875The Life and Growth of Language. New York: D. Appleton & Co.; London: Henry S. King.Google Scholar
1886 “The Method of Phonetic Change in Language”. Proceedings of the American Philological Association 17.xxxiii–xxxv.Google Scholar
1894 “Examples of Sporadic and Partial Phonetic Change in English”. Indogermanische Forschungen 4.32–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilbur, Terence H.
1977 “Introduction”. The Lautgesetz Controversy: A documentation ed. by Terence H. Wilbur, ix–xc. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
1972 “Hugo Schuchardt and the Neogrammarians”. Schuchardt, the Neogrammarians, and the Transformational Theory of Phonological Change ed. by Theo Vennemann & Terence H. Wilbur, 75–113. Frankfurt am Main: Athenäum.Google Scholar