“My imperfect attempt towards an English Grammar”: Lowth’s indebtedness to James Harris in revising his grammar

Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade
Summary

This article provides an analysis of the only evidence that has — to the author’s knowledge — come down to us of the correspondence between the most authoritative 18th-century English grammarian Robert Lowth (1710–1787) and James Harris (1709–1780), author of the philosophical grammar Hermes (1751). The two extant letters uniquely provide insight into Lowth’s views on the pedagogical function of his grammar, on the innovatory aspect of his critical footnotes, and on some of the doubts and uncertainties he experienced while writing his grammar. All this adds to the radically different view of Lowth as a grammarian presented in The Bishop’s Grammar (Tieken-Boon van Ostade 2011), while the article also throws light on Lowth’s attempts at establishing a more private relationship with the author of one of the most important works within the wider 18th-century English grammatical tradition.

Quick links
Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price. Direct PDF access to this article can be purchased through our e-platform.

References

Aitchison, Jean
1981Language Change: Progress or decay? London: Fontana.Google Scholar
Burrows, Donald & Rosemary Dunhill
2002Music and Theatre in Handel’s World: The family papers of James Harris, 1732–1780. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
ECCO Eighteenth Century Collections Online. Thomson Gale.
Harris, James
1751Hermes: or, a Philosophical Inquiry concerning Language and Universal Grammar. London: printed for J. Nourse.Google Scholar
1781Philological Inquiries in Three Parts by James Harris Esq. Volume I. London: printed for C. Nourse.Google Scholar
Hepworth, Brian
1978Robert Lowth. Boston: Twayne.Google Scholar
Lowth, Robert
1762A Short Introduction to English Grammar; with critical notes. London: J. Hughs for A. Millar, and for R. and J. Dodsley.Google Scholar
Michael, Ian
1970English Grammatical Categories and the Tradition to 1800. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Miyawaki, Masataka
2002James Harris’s Theory of Universal Grammar: A synthesis of the Aristotelian and Platonic conceptions of language. Münster: Nodus.Google Scholar
Mossner, E. C. & I. S. Ross
eds. 1987Glasgow Edition of the Works and Correspondence of Adam Smith. Volume VI. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Navest, Karlijn
2006 “An index of names to Lowth’s Short Introduction to English Grammar (1762), (1763), (1764)”. Historical Sociolinguistics and Sociohistorical Linguistics 6 (http://​www​.hum2​.leidenuniv​.nl​/hsl​_shl/; go to: Contents, Articles).
2011John Ash and the Rise of the Children’s Grammar. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
ODNB: The Oxford Dictionary of National Biography
OED: The Oxford English Dictionary
Online edition: www​.oed​.com
Probyn, Clive T.
1991The Sociable Humanist: The life and works of James Harris 1709–1780. Provincial and metropolitan culture in eighteenth-century England. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid
2000 “Robert Dodsley and the Genesis of Lowth’s Short Introduction to English Grammar ”. Historiographia Linguistica 27:1.21–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003 “ ‘Tom’s grammar’: The genesis of Lowth’s Short Introduction to English Grammar revisited”. The Teaching of English in the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries: Essays for Ian Michael on his 88th birthday ed. by Frances Austen & Christopher Stray (= Special issue of Paradigm 2/7), 36–45.Google Scholar
2011The Bishop’s Grammar: Robert Lowth and the rise of prescriptivism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid & Karlijn Navest
2006 “Introduction”. Navest (2006).Google Scholar
Tierney, James E.
ed. 1988The Correspondence of Robert Dodsley 1733–1764. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ward, John
1758Four Essays upon the English Language. London: printed for JohnWard.Google Scholar