Andreas Kempe (1622–89) and the Languages Spoken in Paradise

Claes-Christian Elert
Summary

Several textbooks in general linguistics (by Crystal, Fromkin & Rodman, and Waterman) mention a 17th-century Swede who maintained that, in Paradise, God spoke Swedish, Adam Danish, and the serpent French. The name of this Swede is Andreas Kempe (not Kemke, as given in the above-mentioned books), a religious dissenter, persecuted in his Lutheran homeland. In this paper it is shown that the view that Swedish was the original language agrees with that of his contemporary scholars. The statement on Danish and French, however, appears in a context where it is clear that it was to be interpreted as an expatriate’s attempt to ridicule his adversaries among the Swedish clergy, and should not, therefore, be quoted as a serious opinion.

Quick links
Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price. Direct PDF access to this article can be purchased through our e-platform.

References

Borst, Arno
1957–63Der Turmbau von Babel. 4 vols. Stuttgart: Hiersemann.Google Scholar
Crystal, David
1971Linguistics. Harmondsworth, Essex: Penguin.Google Scholar
Fromkin, Victoria A., and Robert Rodman
1974Introduction to Linguistics. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Hasselberg, Carl J. E.
1921 “Alkemister och grubblare i Jämtland på 1600-talet”. Jämten 15.9–41. Östersund: Östersunds-posten.Google Scholar
1926 “Anders Kempe och hans skrift ‘Israels erfreuliche Botschaft’”. Jämten 20.71–8.Google Scholar
1927 “Anders Kempe som fredsapostel”. Jämten 21.30–42.Google Scholar
Lindroth, Sten
1975Svensk lärdomshistoria. [Vol. 2:] Stormaktstiden. Stockholm: Norstedts.Google Scholar
Schoeps, Hans Joachim
1952Philosemitismus im Barock. Tübingen: Mohr (Siebeck).Google Scholar
Ståhle, Carl Ivar
1951 “Språkteori och ordval i Stiernhielms författarskap”. ANF 66.52–94.Google Scholar
Waterman, John T.
1970Perspectives in Linguistics. An account of the background of modern linguistics. 2nd ed. Chicago & London: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar