A Dissenting Grammarian Qutrub on Declension

C. H. M. Versteegh
University of Nijmegen

Summary

This paper is concerned with a theory held by the Arab grammarian Qutrub (d.206/821) with regard to the inflectional vowels of the noun in Arabic. Contrary to what most grammarians believed, he asserted that these vowels do not serve to indicate (syntactic) functions, but to prevent the combination of two consonants. We examine the methodological background of this theory and argue in particular that (1) Qutrub’s theory about the inflectional vowels is connected — both substantially and terminologically — with his ideas about speech in general. He regards the Arabic language as essentially flexible, since speakers are allowed to choose among alternatives; (2) this same idea is reflected by Qutrub’s interest in ‘addād, i.e., homonyms with contrary meanings, and in mutashābihāt, i.e., Qur’ānic verses which seemingly contradict each other; (3) the clue to his theory is the term cilla “cause”. Basing himself on the doctrine of his Muctazilite teacher al-Nazzām, Qutrub argues that in order to be valid linguistic reasoning must meet certain logical conditions, in particular the condition of reversibility: unless cause and effect, or sign and referent, coexist they cannot be regarded as such. As there is no one-to-one relation between the inflectional vowels and the alleged cause, the accepted opinion about declension cannot be correct; (4) Qutrub’s own solution — the inflectional vowels are used for euphonic reasons — coincides with his interest in phonetic variants and pausal phenomena.

Quick links
Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price. Direct PDF access to this article can be purchased through our e-platform.

References

A.Primary sources

cAbd al-Jabbār, Mughnī
= ’Abū l-Ḥasan cAbd al-Jabbār b. ’Aḥmad al-Ha-mādhānī, Al-Mughnī fī ’abwāb al-tawḥīd wa-l-cadl. Vol. VII Ed. by ’Ibrāhīm al-’Abyārī. Cairo: Dār al-Kutub 1961.Google Scholar
a. Ṭayyib, Mar
. = ’Abū l-Ṭayyib cAbd al-Raḥmān b. cAlī al-Lughawī, Marātib al-naḥwiyyīn Ed. by Muḥammad ’Abū l-Faḍl ’Ibrāhīm. Cairo: Nahḍa 1954.Google Scholar
’Ashc. Maq
. = ’Abū l-Ḥasan cAlī b. ’Ismācīl al-’Ashcarī, Maqālāt al-’islāmiyyīn Ed. by Helmut Ritter. Zweite Auflage. Wiesbaden: Steiner 1963.Google Scholar
’Astar, ShSh
Raḍī al-Dīn Muḥammad b.al-Ḥasan al-’Astarābādhī, Sharḥ Shāfiyat Ibn al-Ḥājib Ed. by Muḥammad Nūr al-Ḥasan, Muḥammad al-Zafzāf, Muḥammad Muḥyī al-Dīn cAbd al-Ḥamīd 4 vols. Cairo Ḥijāzī n.d.
’Azh. Tahdh
. = ’Abū Manṣūr Muḥammad b. ’Aḥmad al-’Azharī, Tahdhīb al-lugha Ed. by Muḥammad cAbd al-Salām Hārūn. 15 vols. Cairo: Dār al-Kātib al-cArabī 1964–67.Google Scholar
Bāq. Tamh
. = ’Abū Bakr Muḥammad b. al-Ṭayyib al-Bāqillānī, Kitāb al-tamhīd Ed. by Richard J. McCarthy. Beyrouth: Librairie Orientale 1957.Google Scholar
b. ’Anb. ’Aḍdād
= ’Abū Bakr Muḥammad b. al-Qāsim al-’Anbārī, Kitāb al-’aḍdād Ed. by Martin Theodor Houtsma (1851–1943) Leiden: E. J. Brill 1881.Google Scholar
b. ’Anb. ’Asr
. = ’Abū l-Barakāt cAbd al-Raḥmān b. Muḥammad al-’Anbārī, ’Asrār al-carabiyya Ed. by Cristian Friedrich Seybold (1859–1921) Leiden: E. J. Brill 1886.Google Scholar
b. ’Anb. ’Inṣ
. = ’Abū l-Barakāt cAbd al-Raḥmān b. Muḥammad al-’Anbārī, Kitāb al-’inṣāf fī masā’il al-khilāf bayna l-naḥwiyyīna l-baṣriyyīna wa-l-kufiyyīn Ed. by Gotthold Weil (1882–1960) Leiden: E. J. Brill 1913.Google Scholar
b. ’Anb. Lum
. = ’Abū l-Barakāt cAbd al-Raḥmān b. Muḥammad al-’Anbārī, Lumac al-’adilla fī ’uṣūl al-naḥw Ed. by Attia Amer [cAṭiyya c Āmir]. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell 1963.Google Scholar
b. ’Anb. Nuzha
= ’Abū l-Barakāt cAbd al-Raḥmān b. Muḥammad al-’Anbārī, Nuzhat al-’alibbā’ fī ṭabaqāt al-’udabā’ Ed. by Attia Amer [cAṭiyya cĀmir]. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell 1963.Google Scholar
b. Fār. Ṣāḥ
. = ’Abū l-Ḥusayn ’Aḥmad b. Fāris, Al-Ṣāḥibī fī fiqh al-lugha Ed. by Moustafa Chouémi [Muṣṭafā Shu’aymī]. Beyrouth: A. Badran 1964.Google Scholar
b. Hish. Mughnī
= Jamāl al-Dīn ’Abū Muḥammad cAbdallāh b. Yūsuf Ibn Hishām, Mughnī al-labīb can kutub al-’acārīb Ed. by Māzin al-Mubārak and Muḥammad cAlī Ḥamdallāh. Damascus: Dār al-Fikr 1969.Google Scholar
b. cIm. Shadh
. = ’Abu l-Falaḥ cAbd al-Ḥayy b. al-cImād, Shadharāt al-dhahab fī ṭabaqāt man dhahab. 8 vols. Cairo: Maktabat al-Quds 1931–33.Google Scholar
b. Jin. Khaṣ
. = ’Abū l-Fatḥ cUthmān Ibn Jinnī, Al-Khaṣā’ iṣ Ed. by Muḥammad cAlī al-Najjār. Cairo 1952–56 (Repr., Beirut: Dār al-Hudā, n.d.).Google Scholar
b. Khall. Waf
. = Shams al-Dīn ’Aḥmad b. Muḥammad Ibn Khallikān, Wafayāt al-’acyān wa-’anbā’ ’abnā’ al-zamān Ed. by ’Iḥsān cAbbās. 7 vols. Beirut: Dār al-Thaqāfa [1968].Google Scholar
b. Maḍ. Radd
= ’Abū l-cAbbās ’Aḥmad Ibn Maḍā’ al-Qurṭubī, Kitāb al-radd calā l-nuḥāt Ed. by Shawqī Ḍayf. Cairo: Dār al-Fikr al-cArabī 1947.Google Scholar
b. Murt. Ṭab
. = ’Aḥmad b. Yaḥyā Ibn al-Murtaḍā, Ṭabaqāt al-Muctazila Ed. by Susanna Diwald-Wilzer. Beirut: Imprimerie Catholique 1961.Google Scholar
b. Nad. Fihr
. = ’Abū l-Faraj Muḥammad b. ’Abī Yacqūb Ibn al-Nadīm al-Warrāq, Kitāb al-Fihrist Ed. by Gustav Flügel (1802–1870) 2 vols. Leipzig 1871–72.Google Scholar
b. Qāḍ. Ṭab
’Abū Bakr Taqī al-Dīn Ibn Qāḍī Shuhba, Ṭabaqāt al-nuḥāt wa-l-lughawiyyīn. Ms. Damascus Ẓāhiriyya 438 ta’rīkh.
b. Sarr. ’Uṣūl
’Abū Bakr Muḥammad b. al-Sarī Ibn al-Sarrāj, Kitāb ’uṣūl al-naḥw. Ms. British Museum Or. 2808.
b. Sid. Mukh
. = ’Abū l-Ḥasan cAlī b. ’Ismācīl Ibn Sīda al-Mursī, Kitāb al-mukhaṣṣaṣ. 17 vols. Ed. Būlāq 1898–1903.Google Scholar
b. cUṣf. Mumt
. = cAlī b. Mu’min Ibn cUṣfūr, Al-Mumtic fī l-taṣrîf Ed. by Fakhr al-Dīn Qabāwa. 2 vols. Aleppo: The Arabian Press 1970.Google Scholar
b. Yacīsh, Sharḥ
= Muwaffaq al-Dīn Yacīsh b. Yacīsh, Sharḥ al-Mufaṣṣal Ed. by Gustav Jahn (1837–1917) Leipzig: F. A. Brockhaus 1882–86.Google Scholar
cIqd
= ’Abū cUmar Ibn cAbd Rabbihi al-’Andalusī, Al-cIqd al-farīd Ed. by Muḥammad Sacīd al-cAryān. Cairo: Maṭbacat al-Istiqāma 1953.Google Scholar
Jāḥiẓ, Bayān
’Abū cUthmān cAmr b. Baḥr al-Jāḥiẓ, Al-Bayān wa-l-tabyīn Ed. by Ḥasan al-Sandūbī 3 vols. Beirut Dār al-Fikr n.d.
Khaṭīb, Ta’rīkh
= ’Abū Bakr’Aḥmad b. cAlī al-Khaṭīb al-Baghdādī, Ta’rīkh Baghdād. 14 vols. Ed. Cairo/Baghdad 1931.Google Scholar
Mub. Muqt
. = ’Abū l-cAbbās Muḥammad b. Yazīd al-Mubarrad, Al-Muqtaḍab Ed. by Muḥammad cAbd al-Khāliq cUḍayma. 4 vols. Cairo: Dār al-Taḥrīr 1965–68.Google Scholar
Nūr al-Qabs
= [’Abū cUbaydallāh Muḥammad b. cImrān al-Marzubānī], Nūr al-Qabs mukhtaṣar al-Muqtabas li-l-Marzubānī Ed. by Rudolf Sellheim. Wiesbaden: F. Steiner 1964.Google Scholar
Qifṭī, ’Inbāh
= Jamāl al-Dīn ’Abū l-Ḥasan cAlī b. Yūsuf al-Qifṭī, ’Inbāh al-ruwāt calā ’anbā’ al-nuḥāt Ed. by Muḥammad ’Abū l-Faḍl ’Ibrāhīm. 3 vols. Cairo 1950–55.Google Scholar
Quṭrub, ’Aḍdād
= ’Abū cAlī Muḥammad b. al-Mustanīr Quṭrub, Kitāb al-’aḍdād Ed. by Hans Kofler (1896–1947) In: Islamica 5 (1931–32) 241–84, 385–461, 493–544.Google Scholar
Quṭrub, ’Azmina
= ’Abū cAlī Muḥammad b. al-Mustanīr Quṭrub, Kitāb al-’azmina. In: Majallat al-Majmac al-cIlmī al-cArabī (RAAD) 2 (1922) 33–46.Google Scholar
Quṭrub, Farq
= ’Abū cAlī Muḥammad b. al-Mustanīr Quṭrub, Kitāb mā khālafa fīhi l-’insān al-bahā’im Ed. by Rudolf Geyer (1861–1929) In: Sitzungsberichte der kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Wien, phil.-hist. Klasse 115 (1888) 380–391.Google Scholar
Rāzī, Maf
. = Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī, Mafātīḥ al-ghayb. 8 vols. Ed. Cairo: Al-Maṭbaca al-Bahiyya al-Miṣriyya 1890–1909.Google Scholar
Sīb. Kit
. = ’Abū Bishr cAmr b. cUthmān Sībawayhi, Al-Kitāb. 2 vols. Ed. Būlāq 1316 A.H. (Repr., Baghdad: Al-Muthannā Library, n.d.).Google Scholar
Sīr. Ṭab
. = ’Abū Sacīd al-Ḥasan b. cAbdallāh al-Sīrāfī, Kitāb ’akhbār al-naḥwiyyīna l-baṣriyyīn Ed. by Fritz Krenkow (1872–1953) Beyrouth: Imprimerie Catholique 1936.Google Scholar
Suy. ’Ashbāh
= Jalāl al-Dīn ’Abū l-Faḍl cAbd al-Raḥmān al-Suyūṭī, Al-’Ashbāh wa-l-naẓā’ir fī l-naḥw Ed. by Ṭāhā cAbd al-Ra’ūf Sacd. 2 vols. Cairo: Maktabat al-Kulliyyāt al-’Azhariyya 1975.Google Scholar
Suy. Bughya
= Jalāl al-Dīn ’Abū l-Faḍl cAbd al-Raḥmān al-Suyūṭī, Bughyat al-wucāt fī ṭabaqāt al-lughawiyyīna wa-l-nuḥāt Ed. by Muḥammad ’Abū l-Faḍl ’Ibrāhīm. 2 vols. Cairo: Maṭbaca cĪsā al-Ḥalabī 1964–65.Google Scholar
Suy. Muzh
. = Jalāl al-Dīn ’Abū l-Faḍl cAbd al-Raḥmān al-Suyūṭī, Al-Muzhir fī culūm al-lugha Ed. Cairo: Maṭbacat al-Sacāda 1325 A.H.Google Scholar
cUkb. Mas
’Abū l-Baqā’ cAbdallāh b. al-Ḥusayn al-cUkbarī, Masā’il khilāfiyya fī l-naḥw Ed. by Muḥammad Khayr al-Ḥalwānī Aleppo n.d.
Yāq. ’Irshād
= ’Abū cAbdallāh Yacqūb Yāqūt al-Rūmī, ’Irshād al-’arīb ’ilā macrifat al-’adīb Ed. by David Samuel Margoliouth (1858–1940) Second edition. 7 vols. London: Luzac & Co. 1923–31.Google Scholar
Zajj. ’Īḍ
. = ’Abū l-Qāsim cAbd al-Raḥmān b. ’Isḥāq al-Zajjāji, Al-’Īḍāḥ fī cilal al-naḥw Ed. by Māzin al-Mubārak. Cairo: Dār al-cUrūba 1959.Google Scholar
Zajj. Lām
. = ’Abū l-Qāsim cAbd al-Raḥmān b. ’Isḥāq al-Zajjājī, Kitāb al-lāmāt Ed. by Māzin al-Mubārak. Damascus: Al-Maṭbaca al-Hāshimiyya 1969.Google Scholar
Zam. Kash
. = ’Abū l-Qāsim Maḥmūd b. cUmar al-Zamakhsharī, Al-Kashshāf can ḥaqā’iq ghawāmiḍ al-tanzīl Ed. by Muṣṭafā Ḥusayn ’Aḥmad. 4 vols. Second edition. Cairo: 1373 A.H.Google Scholar
Zam. Muf
. = ’Abū l-Qasim Maḥmūd b. cUmar al-Zamakhsharī, Kitāb al-Mufaṣṣal fī l-naḥw. Second edition Ed. by Jens Peter Broch (1819–1886) Christiania: Libraria P. T. Mallingii 1879.Google Scholar
Zub. Ṭab
. = ’Abū Bakr Muḥammad b. al-Ḥasan al-Zubaydī, Ṭabaqāt al-naḥwiyyīna wa-l-lughawiyyīn Ed. by Muḥammad ’Abū l-Faḍl ’Ibrāhīm. Cairo: Maktaba Muḥammad Sāmī ’Amīn al-Khānjī 1954.Google Scholar

B.Secondary sources

EI(2) = The Encyclopaedia of Islam. Leiden: E.J. Brill 1908–34 (New ed., prepared by a number of leading orientalists, Leiden: E.J. Brill 1960 --).Google Scholar
GAL = Geschichte der arabischen Literatur, by Carl Brockelmann. 2 Bände. Leiden: E.J. Brill 1943–49 2nd edition. 3 Supplementbände. Leiden: E.J. Brill 1937–42.Google Scholar
GAS = Geschichte des arabischen Schrifttums, by Fuad Sezgin. 6 Bände. Leiden: E.J. Brill 1967–78.Google Scholar
TPA = Traité de philologie arabe, by Henri Fleisch. I,II. Beyrouth: Imprimerie Catholique 1961, 1979.Google Scholar
Arnaldez, Roger
1956Grammaire et théologie chez Ibn Hazm de Cordoue. Paris: J. Vrin.Google Scholar
Beck, Edmund
1945 “Der cuṯmānische Kodex in der Koranlesung des zweiten Jahrhunderts”. Orientalia 14.355–73.Google Scholar
1946 “ cArabiyya, Sunna und cĀmma in der Koranlesung des zweiten Jahrhunderts”. Orientalia 15.180–224.Google Scholar
Ben Milad, Mahjoub
1967 “Ambiguïté et mathānī coraniques. Pour une théorie générale de la polarité dans la culture arabe”. Berque & Charnay 1967:366–81.Google Scholar
Berque, Jacques, and Jean-Paul Charnay
eds. 1967L’ambivalence dans la culture arabe. Paris: Editions Anthropos.Google Scholar
Blachère, Régis
(1900–1973). 1967 “Origine de la théorie des addād”. Berque & Charnay 1967.397–403.Google Scholar
Bohas, Georges
1979Contribution à l’étude de la méthode des grammairiens arabes en morphologie et phonologie d’après des grammairiens ‘tardifs’. Thèse d’état. Univ. de Paris III.Google Scholar
Deichgräber, Karl
1930Die griechische Empirikerschule. Berlin: Weidmann. (Repr., Berlin and Zürich: Weidmann 1965.)Google Scholar
van Ess, Josef
1966Die Erkenntnislehre des cAdudaddīn al-Īcī. Wiesbaden: F. Steiner.Google Scholar
1967 “Ein unbekanntes Fragment des Nazzām”. In: Der Orient in der Forschung. Festschrift für O. Spies, ed. by Wilhelm Hoenerbach, 170–201. Wiesbaden: O. Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
1970 “The logical structure of Islamic theology”. In: Logic in Classical Islamic Culture, ed. by Gustav E. von Grunebaum, 21–50. Wiesbaden: O. Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Flügel, Gustav
(1802–1870). 1862Die grammatischen Schulen der Araber. Erste Abtheilung. Leipzig: F.A. Brockhaus (Repr., Nendeln: Kraus 1966.)Google Scholar
Goldziher, Ignaz
(1850–1921). 1920Die Richtungen der islamischen Koranauslegung. Leiden: E.J. Brill. (Repr. 1970.)Google Scholar
Haffner, Auguste
(1869–1914), and Louis Cheikho (1859–1927). 1914 Dix anciens traités de philologie arabe. 2ème édition. Beyrouth: Imprimerie Catholique.Google Scholar
Kamal, Ribhi
1967 “Le tad’ādd”. Berque & Charnay 1967.51–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kofler, Hans
(1896–1947). 1931–32 “Das Kitāb al-addād von Abū Muhammad Qutrub ibn al-Mustanīr. Herausgegeben und mit erklärenden Anmerkungen verseilen”. Islamica 5.241–84, 385–461, 493–544.Google Scholar
Leskien, August
(1840–1916). 1876Die Deklination im Slavischen, Litauischen und Germanischen. Leipzig: F. A. Brockhaus.Google Scholar
Méhiri, Abdelkader
1973Les théories grammaticales d’Ibn Jinnī. Tunis: Univ. de Tunis.Google Scholar
Mubārak, Māzin
1963Al-Rummānīal-Nahwī fī daw’ sharhihi li-Kitāb Sība-wayh. Damascus: Matbaca Jāmica Dimashq.Google Scholar
Nader, Albert
1956Le système philosophique des Muctazila. Beyrouth: Editions ‘Les Lettres Orientales’.Google Scholar
Rabin, Chaim
1951Ancient West-Arabian. London: Taylor’s Foreign Press.Google Scholar
Reckendorf, Hermann
(1863–1923). 1921Arabische Syntax. Heidelberg: C. Winter.Google Scholar
Silvestre de Sacy, Antoine Isaac
(1758–1838). 1829Anthologie grammaticale arabe. Paris: Imprimerie Royale. (Repr., Osnabrück: Biblio Verlag 1973.)Google Scholar
Ullmann, Manfred
1976 “Der Werwolf. Ein griechisches Sagenmotiv in arabischer Verkleidung”. Wiener Zeitschrift zur Kunde des Morgenlandes 68.171–84.Google Scholar
Versteegh, Cornelis H. M.
1977Greek Elements in Arabic Linguistic Thinking. Leiden: E. J. Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wagner, Ewald
1965Abū Nuwās: Eine Studie zur arabischen Literatur der frühen cAbbasidenzeit. Wiesbaden: O. Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Weiss, Bernard
1966Language in Orthodox Muslim Thought: A Study of ‘Wad’ al-lughah’. Diss., Princeton University.Google Scholar
Wild, Stefan
1965Das Kitāb al-cain und die arabische Lexikographie. Wiesbaden: O. Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Wright, William
(1830–1889). 1964A Grammar of the Arabic Language. Third edition revised by W. Robertson Smith and M. J. de Goeje. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar