Philologia Linguistica: Lionardo Salviatis Kommentar der Sprache Boccaccios (1584/86)

Summary

Lionardo Salviati (1539–89), arbiter of literary and linguistic taste in Florence as well as outside Florence — Tasso and Guarini consulted him — left behind an oeuvre of great verbal art (orations, poetry, theatre pieces, and philosophical treatises), but especially a commentary on the language of Boccaccio (1313–75) which, beneath its philological appearance, hides a theory of language and a grammar of Florentine. In addition, he inspired the Accademia della Crusca which, in 1612, was to publish the first edition of its famous Vocabulary, model for the Dictionnaire of the Académie Française and other works of its kind. The paper shows how Salviati’s Avvertimenti della lingua sopra’l Decamerone (1584/86) attempt to reconcile, in a traditionalist and inoffensive manner, the diverse tendencies of the debate concerning the Italian language and to propose new, frequently revolutionary solutions. Thus Salviati proposed a model of language based on the twofold choice between contemporary popular usage and literary eclecticism and opened the theoretical possibility to linguistic innovation within the continuity of the old language. An analysis of the Avvertimenti is offered which is careful to point out the subtle relationships between philological and linguistic themes. With the help of lengthy quotations from Salviati’s treatment of the definite and indefinite articles it is shown how he reorganized the traditional grammatical schemes and how he tried to lay bare the linguistic structure of diverse facts of observed speech.

Quick links
Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price. Direct PDF access to this article can be purchased through our e-platform.

Literatur

Brown, Peter M.
Una grammatichetta inedita del Cav. Lionardo Salviati”. Giornale storico della letteratura italiana 133.544–72.
1957a “I veri promotori della ‘Rassettatura’ del ‘Decameron’ nel 1582”. Ibid. 134. 314–332.Google Scholar
1957b “Il discorso sopra la ginnastica degli antichi attribuito al Cav. Lionardo Salviati”. Annali della scuola normale superiore di Pisa, s.2, 26.98–111.Google Scholar
1957c “L’edizione del 1873 delle ‘Prose inedite’ del Cav. Lionardo Salviati”. Rinascimento 8.111–29.Google Scholar
1957d “Lionardo Salviati and the Ordine di Santo Stefano”. Italica 34.69–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1960 “Lionardo Salviati and the ‘Discorso sopra le prime parole di Cornelio Tacito’”. Ibid. 15.50–64.Google Scholar
1962 “Nota sui manoscritti di Lionardo Salviati”. Studi di filologia italiana 20.137–146.Google Scholar
1966 “Aims and Methods of the Second ‘Rassettatura’ of the Decameron”. Studi secenteschi 8.3–41.Google Scholar
1969 “Manoscritti e stampe delle poesie edite e inedite del Cavaliere Lionardo Salviati”. Giornale storico della letteratura italiana 146.530–52.Google Scholar
1971 “Jacopo Corbinelli and the Florentine ‘Crows’”. Italian Studies 26.69–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1972 “In Defence of Ariosto: Giovanni de’Bardi and Lionardo Salviati”. Studi secenteschi 14.3–27.Google Scholar
1974Lionardo Salviati: A critical biography. London: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
D’Ovidio, Francesco
1911 “Appunti sulla storia della zeta”. Studi letterari e linguistici dedicati a Pio Rajna, 231–49. Firenze: Ariani.Google Scholar
Engler, Rudolf
1970 “Semiologische Lese (Betrachtungen zu Saussure, Salviati und Chrétien de Troyes)”. Linguistique contemporaine. Hommage à Eric Buyssens, 61–73. Bruxelles: Institut de Sociologie. S.Google Scholar
1974 “Lionardo Salviati e la linguistica cinquecentesca”. XIV Congresso internazionale di linguistica e filologia romanza, Napoli, 15–20 aprile 1974. Atti, Bd. 4, 625–33. Napoli: Macchiaroli; Amsterdam: Benjamins 1982.Google Scholar
1975 “I fondamenti della favella in Lionardo Salviati e l’idea saussuriana di langue complète’”. Lingua e stile 10.17–28.Google Scholar
Heinimann, Siegfried
1965/67 “Die Lehre vom Artikel in den romanischen Sprachen von der mittelalterlichen Grammatik zur modernen Sprachwissenschaft: Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der grammatischen Begriffsbildung”. Vox Romanica 24.23–43; 26.180–192.Google Scholar
Kukenheim, Louis
1932Contributions à l’histoire de la grammaire italienne, espagnole et française à l’époque de la Renaissance. Amsterdam: Noord-Hollandsche Uitgevers-Maatschappij. (Repr., Utrecht: H&S 1974.)Google Scholar
Labande-Jeanroy, Thérèse
1925La question de la langue en Italie. Strasbourg-Paris: Istra.Google Scholar
Migliorini, Bruno
1943 “Nota sulla sintassi dell’articolo. Atti ‘La Colombaria’. 1.89–107.Google Scholar
1955 “Note sulla grafia italiana nel Rinascimento”. Studi di filologia italiana 13.259–96.Google Scholar
1961Storia della lingua italiana. Firenze: Sansoni.Google Scholar
Sozzi, B. T.
1955 “Leonardo Salviati nella questione linguistica cinquecentesca”. Aspetti e momenti della questione linguistica nel Cinquecento, 101–173. Padova: Liviana.Google Scholar
Trabalza, Ciro
1908Storia della grammatica italiana. Milano: Hoepli.Google Scholar
Vitale, Maurizio
1978La questione della lingua. Nuova ed., Palermo: Palumbo.Google Scholar
Vivaldi, Vincenzo
1925Storia delle controversie linguistiche in Italia da Dante ai nostri giorni. Bd. 1: Da Dante a M. Cesarotti. Catanzaro: Mauro.Google Scholar
Zambaldi, F.
1892 “Delle teorie ortografiche in Italia”. Atti del R. Istituto veneto di scienze, lettere ed art, serie 7, t. 3 in 3.Google Scholar