19th-Century Italian: Manzonian or Deamicisian?

Summary

The novelist Edmondo de Amicis (1846–1908) was an important figure in the discussions of standard literary Italian at the end of the 19th and the beginning of the 20th centuries. In his influential book L’idioma gentile (1905), he advocated a compromise between two extreme positions, pro- and anti-Tuscan, towards the Questione della lingua or language-problem, which had been a subject of debate for over four hundred years. While supporting the claims of Tuscan usage to be regarded as a model, de Amicis rejected the doctrine favored by his fellow-novelist Alessandro Manzoni (the ‘soluzione manzoniana’) that the spoken language of the Florentine upper classes should be the only standard. Especially with regard to the value of dialects, de Amicis took a more liberal position than the extreme pro-Florentine purists of the 19th century. De Amicis exerted a strong influence, especially through the schools (where his works were widely read), and the actual solution to the problem of standard Italian after 1870 deserves to be called ‘deAmicisian’ rather than ‘Manzonian’.

Quick links
Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price. Direct PDF access to this article can be purchased through our e-platform.

References

Carrannante, Antonio
1977 “Carlo Cattaneo e Carlo Tenca di fronte alle teorie linguistiche del Manzoni.” Giornale storico della letteratura italiana 154.213–237.Google Scholar
Dàrdano, Maurizio
1975G.I. Ascoli e la questione della lingua, Roma: Istituto dell’Enciclopedia Italiana.Google Scholar
de Amicis, Edmondo
1905L’idioma gentile. Milano: Fratelli Treves. (2nd ed. 1906, followed by several further reprintings.)Google Scholar
d’Ovidio, Francesco
1895Le correzioni ai Promessi Sposi e la questione della lingua. Nàpoli: Luigi Pierro.Google Scholar
Façon, Nina
1971Corso di storia della lingua italiana. 2 vols. Bucureşti: Centrul de multiplicare al Universităţii din Bucureşti.Google Scholar
Hall, Robert A., Jr.
1942The Italian Questione della Lingua: an interpretative essay. (University of North Carolina Series in the Romance Languages and Literature, 4.) Chapel Hill, N.C.: Univ. of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
1978Antonio Fogazzaro. (= Twayne World Authors Series, 470.) Boston, Massachusetts: Twayne Publishers.Google Scholar
Marazzini, Claudio
1976 “Il gran ‘polverone’ intorno alla relazione manzoniana del 1868.” Archivio Glottologico Italiano 61.117–129.Google Scholar
Matarrese, Tina
1980 “’Città’ e ‘campagna’ nell’antifiorentinismo di Lambruschini.” Studî di filologia romanza e italiana offerti a Gianfranco Folena dagli allievi padovani, 465–83. Modena: S.T.E.M.-Mucchi. (Also in Cultura Neolatina 41.69–87 [1981].)Google Scholar
Migliorini, Bruno
1949 “La questione della lingua.” Problemi ed orientamenti critici di lingua e letteratura italiana ed. by Attilio Momigliano 3.1–75. Milano: Marzorati.Google Scholar
1960Storia della lingua italiana. Firenze: Sansoni.Google Scholar
Migliorini, Bruno, and T. Gwynfor Griffith
1966The Italian Language. London: Faber & Faber; New York: Barnes & Noble.Google Scholar
Monterosso, Ferruccio
1971 “Manzoniani e antimanzoniani”. Nuova Antologia 513.222–26.Google Scholar
Pasquazi, Silvio
1970La dottrina linguistica del Manzoni. Roma: Elia.Google Scholar
Patruno, Nicholas
1977Language in Giovanni Verga’s Early Novels. (= University of North Carolina Series in the Romance Languages and Literature, 188.) Chapel Hill, N.C.: Univ. of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Peirone, Luigi
1977Polemiche sulla teoria linguistica manzoniana. Gènova: Tilgher.Google Scholar
Raicich, Marino
1966 “Questione della lingua e scuola (1860–1900)”. Belfagor 21.245–268, 369–408.Google Scholar
Reynolds, Barbara
1950The Linguistic Writings of Alessandro Manzoni: A textual and chronological reconstruction. Cambridge: Heffer.Google Scholar
Tosto, Eugenio
1967 “Una polemica linguistica agli inizî del Novecento (Croce e de Amicis)”. Lingua Nostra 28.68–74.Google Scholar
Vitale, Maurizio
1951 “Il purismo di A. Césari”. Lettere Italiane 2.1–35.Google Scholar
1960La questione della lingua [Palermo:] Palumbo. (2nd ed. 1978.)Google Scholar
Voorhoeve, Jan
1967 Review of R. A. Hall Jr.: Pidgin and Creole Languages (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell Univ. Press 1966) Lingua 18.101–105.Google Scholar