Collaboration in dialogues
Table of contents
In analysing illocutionary aspects of talk, speech act theorizing moved beyond restricted monologic talk (Austin 1962). The added focus on indirectness and implicit meaning invokes the notion of recipients in dialogues. Yet, speech act theorizing is still somewhat monologic in that speech acts are primarily defined in terms of speaker intentions rather than in terms of reflexive processes in face-to-face speaker–hearer interactions. Human beings are reflexive creatures, capable of selfreflection as well as reflections about what others may think about their comport. This means that dialogues are infinitely complex in that they involve at least a four-way traffic:
References
Aronsson, K.
Aronsson, K. & A.-C. Cederborg
1994 Conarration and voice in family therapy. Voicing, devoicing, and orchestration. Text 14: 345–370. BoP ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Aronsson, K.A.-C. Cederborg.
Aronsson, K. & C. Nilholm
Aston, G.
1993 Notes on the interlanguage of comity. In G. Kasper & S. Blum-Kulka (eds.) Interlanguage pragmatics. 224–250. Oxford University Press. BoP![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bakhtin, M.
Blum-Kulka, S. & H. Sheffer
1993 The metapragmatic discourse of American-Israeli families at dinner. In G. Kasper & S. Blum-Kulka (eds.) Interlanguage pragmatics: 196–223. Oxford University Press. BoP![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Buttny, R.
Clark, H.H. & D. Wilkes-Gibbs
Edwards, D. & D. Middleton
1988 Conversational remembering and family relationships. How children learn to remember. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 5: 3–25.
BoP![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Edwards, D. & J. Potter
Goffman, E.
Goodwin, M.H.
Labov, W.
Lave, J. & E. Wenger
Linell, P.
Linell, P. & L. Jönsson
Linell, P. & I. Markova
Loftus, E. & J.C.W. Palmer
Ochs, E., R. Smith & C. Taylor
Ochs, E. & C. Taylor
Ochs, E.C. Taylor.
Ochs, E. & B. Schieffelin
1984 Language acquisition and socialization. Three developmental stories. In R. Shweder and R. Levine (eds.) Culture theory. Essays on mind, self and emotion: 276–320. Cambridge University Press. BoP![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Olshtain, E. & S. Blum-Kulka
1989 Happy Hebrish. Mixing and switching in American-Israeli family interactions. In S. Gass, C. Madden, D. Preston & L. Selinker (eds.) Variation in second language acquisition: 59–82. Multilingual Matters. BoP![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Peyrot, M.
Reddy, M.
1974 The conduit metaphor. A case of frame conflict in our language about language. In A. Ortony (ed.) Metaphor and thought: 284–324. Cambridge University Press. BoP![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shotter, J. & K. Gergen
Simmel, G.
Trevarthen, C. & P. Hubley