Componential analysis

Cliff Goddard
Table of contents

Componential analysis (CA) in the broadest sense, also known as ‘lexical decomposition’, is any attempt to formalize and standardize procedures for the analysis of word meanings. CA often aspires to represent the cognitive or psychological reality of the speakers, and to shed light on correlations between language and culture.

Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price.


Apresjan, J.
1974Leksiceskaja Semantika — Sinonimeceskie Sredstva Jazyka. Nauka. [Transl. A. Arbor (1992) Lexical Semantics: User’s Guide to Contemporary Russian Vocabulary. Karoma Publishers Inc.] Google Scholar
2000Systematic Lexicography [Transl. K. Windle]. Oxford.Google Scholar
Boguslawski, A.
1970On semantic primitives and meaningfulness. In R.J.A. Greimas, M.R. Mayenowa & S. Zolkiewski (eds.) Sign, Language and Culture: 143–152. Mouton.Google Scholar
Burling, R.
1970Man’s Many Voices: Language in its Cultural Context. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Coseriu, E. & H. Geckeler
1974Linguistics and semantics. In T.A. Sebeok (ed.) Current Trends in Linguistics: 103–171. Mouton.Google Scholar
Geckeler, H.
1971Strukturelle Semantik und Wortfeldtheorie. Fink.Google Scholar
Goddard, C.
1998Semantic Analysis: a practical introduction. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(ed.) In press Ethnopragmatics: Understanding discourse in cultural context Mouton de Gruyter DOI logo  BoP
Goddard, C. & A. Wierzbicka
(eds.) 1994Lexical and Semantic Universals — Theory and Empirical Findings. Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goddard, C. A. Wierzbicka
(eds.) 2002Meaning and Universal Grammar — Theory and Empirical Findings, vols. 1 & 2. Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goddard, C. & A. Wierzbicka
(eds.) 2004Cultural Scripts. Intercultural Pragmatics 1(2) (Special issue).Google Scholar
Goodenough, W.H.
1956Componential analysis and the study of meaning. Language 32 (1): 195–216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greimas, A.J.
1966Sémantique structurale. Recherche de méthod. Larousse. [Transl.D. McDowell, R. Schleifer & A. Velie (1983) Structural Semantics: An Attempt at a Method. University of Nebraska Press].Google Scholar
Harkins, J. & A. Wierzbicka
(eds.) 2001Emotions in Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Hjelmslev, L.
1943Omkring sprogteoriens grundlæggelse. Lunos. [Transl. F. J. Whitfield (1953) Prolegomena to a theory of language. Indiana University] Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R.
1990Semantic Structures. MIT Press.Google Scholar
1991Parts and boundaries. In B. Levin & S. Pinker (eds.) Lexical and Conceptual Semantics: 9–47. Blackwell.Google Scholar
2002Foundations of Language: Brain, meaning, grammar, evolution. Oxford University Press.  BoP DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Katz, J.J.
1972Semantic Theory. Harper & Row.Google Scholar
1987Common sense in semantics. In E. Lepore (ed.) New Directions in Semantics. 157–234. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Katz, J.J. & J.A. Fodor
1963The structure of a semantic theory. Language 39: 170–210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G.
1972Linguistics and natural logic. In D. Davidson & G. Harman (eds.) Semantics of Natural Language: 545–665. Reidel. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Leech, G.
1981Semantics: The study of meaning. Penguin.Google Scholar
Lehrer, A.
1974Semantic Fields and Lexical Structure. North-Holland Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Lounsbury, F.G.
1956A semantic analysis of the Pawnee kinship usage. Language 32 (1): 158–194. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lyons, J.
1977Semantics. Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Mel’čuk, I.A. & A.K. Zholkovskij
1970Toward a functioning Meaning-Text Model of language. Linguistics 57: 10–47.Google Scholar
Miller, G.A. & P.N. Johnson-Laird
1976Language and Perception. Cambridge University Press.  BoP DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nida, E.A.
1964Linguistic and semantic structure. In A.S. Dil (ed.) 1975 Language Structure and Translation. Essays by Eugene A. Nida. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
1975Componential Analysis of Meaning. Mouton.Google Scholar
Porzig, W.
1934Wesenhafte Bedeutungsbeziehungen. Beiträge zur deutschen Sprache und Literatur 58: 70–97.Google Scholar
Pottier, B.
1974Linguistique Générale. Klincksieck.Google Scholar
1963Recherches sur l’analyse sémantique en linguistique et en traduction méchanique. Université de Nancy.Google Scholar
Schank, R.C.
1973Conceptual information processing. North-Holland.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Talmy, L.
1985Lexicalization patterns: semantic structure in lexical forms. In T. Shopen (ed.) Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon: 57–149. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Trier, J.
1934Das sprachliche Feld. Eine Auseinandersetzung. Neue Jahrbücher für Wissenschaft und Jugendbildung 10: 428–49.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, A.
1972Semantic Primitives. Athenäum.  BoPGoogle Scholar
1985Lexicography and Conceptual Analysis. Karoma.Google Scholar
1992Semantics: Culture and cognition. Oxford University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
1996Semantics: Primes and universals. Oxford University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
1997Understanding Cultures through their Key Words. Oxford University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
1999Emotions across Languages and Cultures. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003Cross-cultural Pragmatics: the semantics of social interaction. Mouton de Gruyter. [Expanded 2nd edition, originally published 1991].  BoP DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilks, Y.
1975A preferential, pattern-seeking semantics for natural language inference. Artificial Intelligence 6: 53–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar