Contextualism is a view about meaning, semantic content and truth-conditions, bearing significant consequences for the characterisation of explicit and implicit content, the decoding/inferring distinction and the semantics/pragmatics interface. According to the traditional perspective in semantics (called “literalism” or “semantic minimalism”), it is possible to attribute truth-conditions to a sentence independently of any context of utterance, i.e. in virtue of its meaning alone. We must then distinguish between the proposition literally expressed by a sentence (“what is said” by the sentence, its literal truth-conditions) and the implicit meaning of the sentence (“what is implicated” by a speaker uttering the sentence). Over the past forty years, however, an increasing number of linguists and philosophers have begun to underline the phenomenon of semantic underdetermination: the encoded meaning of the sentence employed by a speaker underdetermines the proposition explicitly expressed by an utterance of that sentence. According to the extreme version of this perspective – labelled “radical contextualism” – no sentence of a natural language expresses a complete proposition, or has fixed truth-conditions, even when unambiguous and devoid of indexicals. A sentence expresses a proposition only when completed and enriched with pragmatic constituents that do not correspond to any syntactic element of the sentence and yet are part of its semantic interpretation.
References
Austin, J.
1961Philosophical Papers. J. Urmson & G. Warnock (eds.) 1979 3rd ed. Oxford University Press. BoP
Bach, K.
2001You don’t say?Synthèse 128: 15–44.
Bach, K.
2002Seemingly semantic intuitions. In J. Keim Campbell, M. O’ Rourke & D. Shier (eds.) Meaning and Truth: 21–33. Seven Bridges Press.
2003How to Refer: Objective Context vs. Intentional Context. In P. Blackburnet al. (eds.) Modeling and Using Context, CONTEXT ‘03, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 2680: 54–65. Springer.
Bianchi, C.
2006‘Nobody loves me’: Quantification and context. Philosophical Studies 130: 377–97.
Bianchi, C.
2009Pragmatica cognitiva. I meccanismi della comunicazione. Laterza.
2007Minimalism versus Contextualism in Semantics. In G. Preyer & G. Peter (eds.) Context-Sensitivity and Semantic Minimalism. New Essays on Semantics and Pragmatics: 339–359. Oxford University Press. BoP
Cappelen, H. & E. Lepore
2005Insensitive Semantics. A Defense of Semantic Minimalism and Speech Act Pluralism. Blackwell. BoP
Carston, R.
2002Thoughts and utterances: the pragmatics of explicit communication. Blackwell. MetBib
Carston, R.
2004aRelevance Theory and the Saying/Implicating Distinction. In L.R. Horn & G. Ward (eds.) Handbook of Pragmatics: 633–656. Blackwell.
Carston, R.
2004bTruth-Conditional Content and Conversational Implicature. In C. Bianchi (ed.): 65–100. BoP
Corazza, E.
2007Contextualism, minimalism, and situationalism. Pragmatics and Cognition (1): 115–137. BoP
Corazza, E. & J. Dokic
2007Sense and Insensibility Or Where Minimalism Meets Contextualism. In G. Preyer & G. Peter (eds.) Context-Sensitivity and Semantic Minimalism. New Essays on Semantics and Pragmatics: 169–193. Oxford University Press. BoP
Garcia-Carpintero, M. & M. Kölbel
(eds.)2008Relative Truth. Oxford University Press.
Gauker, C.
1997Domain of Discourse. Mind 106: 1–32.
Gauker, C.
2003Words without meaning. MIT Press.
Gibbs, R. & J. Moise
1997Pragmatics in Understanding What is Said. Cognition 62: 51–74.
Grice, H.P.
1989Studies in the Way of Words. Harvard University Press.
Kaplan, D.
1989Afterthoughts. In J. Almog, J. Perry & H. Wettstein (eds.) Themes from Kaplan: 565–614. Oxford University Press.
Kölbel, M.
2008Introduction: Motivations for Relativism. In M. Garcia-Carpintero & M. Kölbel (eds.): 1–40.
Macfarlane, J.
2005Making Sense of Relative Truth. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 105: 321–39.
Macfarlane, J.
2007Semantic Minimalism and Nonindexical Contextualism. In G. Preyer & G. Peter (eds.) Context-Sensitivity and Semantic Minimalism. New Essays on Semantics and Pragmatics: 240–250. Oxford University Press.
1986Thought without Representation. In J. Perry (ed.) 1993 The Problem of the Essential Indexical and Other Essays: 205–218. Oxford University Press.
Perry, J.
1998Indexicals, Contexts and Unarticulated Constituents. In A. Aliseda, R. Van Gabeek & D. Westerstahl (eds.) Computing Natural Language: 1–11. CSLI Publications.
Predelli, S.
2005aContexts. Meaning, Truth, and the Use of Language. Oxford University Press. BoP
Predelli, S.
2005bPainted Leaves, Context, and Semantic Analysis. Linguistics and Philosophy 28: 351–74.
Recanati, F.
1993Direct Reference: From Language to Thought. Blackwell. BoP
2004aLiteral Meaning. Cambridge University Press. BoP
Recanati, F.
2004b‘What is said’ and the Semantics/Pragmatics Distinction. In C. Bianchi (ed.): 45–64.
Recanati, F.
2007Perspectival Thought. A Plea for (Moderate) Relativism. Oxford University Press.
Recanati, F.
2008Moderate Relativism. In M. Garcia-Carpintero & M. Kölbel (eds.): 41–62.
Sbisa, M.
2009Contextualism without incompleteness. European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 5: 55–72.
Searle, J.
1979Expression and Meaning. Cambridge University Press. BoP
Searle, J.
1980The Background of Meaning. In J. Searle, F. Kiefer & M. Bierwisch (eds.) Speech Act Theory and Pragmatics: 221–232. D. Reidel Publishing Company. BoP
1981The True and the False: the Domain of Pragmatics. Benjamins. BoP
Travis, Ch.
1985On What Is Strictly Speaking True. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 15: 187–229. BoP
Travis, Ch.
1996Meaning's Role in Truth. Mind 105: 451–466.
Travis, Ch
1997Pragmatics. In B. Hale & C. Wright (eds.) A Companion to the Philosophy of Language: 87–107. Blackwell. BoP
Turner, K.
(ed.)1999The Semantics/Pragmatics Interface from Different Points of View (Current Research in the Semantics/Pragmatics Interface, vol. 1). Elsevier. BoP
Waismann, F.
1940Verifiability. In A. Flew (ed.) 1951 Logic and Language. Blackwell.