Figures of Speech

Manfred Kienpointner
Table of contents

Figures of Speech (= FSP, also called “rhetorical figures” or “figures of rhetoric”; the term FSP will be used in its broadest sense, including both tropes and FSP in the narrow sense, that is, figures of diction and figures of thought) can be briefly defined as the output of discourse strategies for creating communicatively adequate texts (cf. below Section 3.1. for a more detailed definition). From antiquity onwards, they have been studied as one of the main branches of rhetoric. In ancient rhetoric, FSP were mainly characterized as a kind of ornament. Moreover, a detailed typology of FSP was developed. In recent times, various theories of style have been developed which present quite different definitions and characterizations of FSP. Several authors have tried to establish standards of classification and demarcation of FSP which are more satisfactory than those of ancient rhetoric. There also have been attempts to extend the concept of FSP to nonverbal domains (e.g. FSP in the visual arts: painting, cinema etc.). Not very surprisingly, metaphor has attracted far more interest than any other FSP: therefore, studies on metaphor will be mentioned more frequently than work on other FSP.

Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price.

References

Aitchison, J.
1994 Words in the Mind. Blackwell.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aldrich, V.C
1983 Visuelle Metapher. In A. Haverkamp (ed.): 142–159.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aristotle
1991 On Rhetoric. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1960 Posterior Analytics. Topica. Heinemann.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1965 Poetics. Clarendon.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bacry, P.
1992 Les figures de style. Belin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Becker, J. & A. Kibédi Varga
(eds.) 1993 The Appeal of Images. Argumentation 7(1)(Special issue).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Behrens, L.
1993 Lexikalische Ambiguität und Disambiguierung im Kontext der maschinellen Übersetzung. In P.R .Lutzeier (ed.): 251–268.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Black, M.
1954 Metaphor. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 55: 273–294.  BoP Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bradford, A.N
1982 Classical and Modern Views of the Figures of Speech: Ancient Theory and Modern Manifestations. Ph.D. New York.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, P. & S. Levinson
1987 Politeness. Some Universals of Language Usage. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cahn, M.
1989 Paralipse und Homöopathie. In H. Schanze & J. Kopperschmidt (eds.) Rhetorik und Philosophie: 275–295. Fink.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carbonell, J.G
1982 Metaphor: An Inescapable Phenomenon in Natural-Language Comprehension. In W.G. Lehnert & M.H. Ringle (eds.) Strategies for Natural Language Processing: 415–434. Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cicero
1951 De oratore. Clarendon.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corbett, E.P.J. & R.J. Connors
1999 Classical Rhetoric for the Modern Student. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coseriu, E.
1956 La creación metafórica en el lenguaje. University de la República.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1994 Textlinguistik. Francke.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Debatin, B.
(eds.) 1997 Metaphor and Rational Discourse. Niemeyer.  MetBibGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Man, P.
1979 Allegories of Reading: Figural Language in Rousseau, Nietzsche, Rilke and Proust. New Haven.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Dijk, T.A.
1980 Textwissenschaft. dtv. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Dijk, T.A. & W. Kintsch
1983 Strategies of Discourse Comprehension. Academic Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dubois, J
1974 Allgemeine Rhetorik. Fink.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dumarsais, C. & P. Fontanier
1984. [1818] Les Tropes. Slatkine.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eco, U.
1972 Einführung in die Semiotik. Fink.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1985 Semiotik und Philosophie der Sprache. Fink. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Eemeren, F.H
2010 Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse. Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Eemeren, F.H. & R. Grootendorst
1992 Argumentation, Communication and Fallacies. Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eggs, E.
1994 Grammaire du discours argumentatif. Kimé.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Enkvist, N.E.
1973 Linguistic Stylistics. Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fairclough, N.
1989 Language and Power. Longman.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fass, D.
1988 An Account of Coherence, Semantic Relation, Metonymy, and Lexical Ambiguity Resolution. In S.L. Small, G.W. Cottrell & M.K. Tanenhaus (eds.) Lexical Ambiguity Resolution: 151–177. Kaufmann.  MetBibGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fogelin, R.J.
1987 Some figures of Speech. In F.H. Van Eemeren et al. (eds.) Argumentation: Across the Lines of Discipline: 263–272. Foris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1988 Figuratively Speaking. Yale University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fontanier, P.
1968 Les figures du discours. Flammarion.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Freeman, D.C.
(ed.) 1970 Linguistics and Literary Style. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Freud, S.
1975 The Psychopathology of Everyday Life. Penguin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, R.
1994 The Poetics of Mind. Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goatly, A.
1997 The Language of Metaphors. Routledge.  BoP Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grice, H.P.
1975 Logic and Conversation. In P. Cole & J.L. Morgan (eds.) Syntax and Semantics, vol. 3: 41–58.Academic Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Groarke, L.
1996 Logic, Art and Argument. Informal Logic 18(2): 105–129. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2002 Toward a pragma-dialectics of visual argument. In F.H. Van Eemeren (ed.) Advances in Pragma-Dialectics: 137–151. SicSat/Vale Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2009 Five Theses on Toulmin and Visual Argument. In F.H. Van Eemeren & B. Garssen (eds.) Pondering on Problems of Argumentation: 229–239. Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K.
1994 An Introduction to Functional Grammar. Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haverkamp, A.
(ed.) 1983 Theorie der Metapher. Wiss. Buchgesellschaft.  MetBibGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopper, R.
1992 Speech Errors and the Poetics of Conversation. Text and Performance Quarterly 12(2): 113–124. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hymes, D.
1998 When is oral narrative poetry? Generative Form and its Pragmatic Conditions. Pragmatics 8(4): 475–500.  BoP Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ilie, C.
1994 What Else Can I Tell You? A Pragmatic Study of English Rhetorical Questions as Discursive and Argumentative Acts. Almqvist & Wiksell.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jaffe, S.
1980 Freud as Rhetorician: Elocutio and Dreamwork. Rhetorik 1: 42–69.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jakobson, R
1960 Closing Statement: Linguistics and Poetics. In T. Sebeok (ed.) Style in Language: 350–377. MIT-Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1971a Two Aspects of Language and Two Types of Aphasic Disturbances. In R. Jakobson (1971b): 239–259.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1971b Selected Writings, vol. 2. Mouton.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1977 Huit questions de poétique. Seuil.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. & C. Lévi-Strauss
1977 “Les Chats” de Charles Baudelaire. In R. Jakobson: 163–188.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. & L.R. Waugh
1979 The Sound Shape of Language. Harvester Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kennedy, V. & J. Kennedy
(eds.) 1993 Metaphor and Visual Rhetoric. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 8(3)(Special issue).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, C.
1986 L’implicite. Colin.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kibédi-Varga, A.
1970 Rhétorique et littérature. Didier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kienpointner, M.
1996 Vernünftig argumentieren. Rowohlt.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2004 Metaphern für Emotionen: Universalien oder Kulturspezifika? In L. Zybatow (ed.) Translation in der globalen Welt und neue Wege in der Sprach- und Übersetzerausbildung: 61–91. Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kittay, E.F.
1987 Metaphor. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kloepfer, R.
1975 Poetik und Linguistik. Fink.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Knape, J.
1996 Figurenlehre. In G. Ueding (ed.) Historisches Wörterbuch der Rhetorik, vol. 3: 289–342. Niemeyer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kopperschmidt, J.
(ed.) 1990/1991 Rhetorik, 2 vols. Wiss. Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z.
2000 Metaphor and emotion. Cambridge Univ. Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2002 Metaphor. Oxford Univ. Press.  MetBibGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lacan, J.
1983 Das Drängen des Buchstabens im Unbewußten oder die Vernunft seit Freud. In A. Haverkamp (ed.): 175–215.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G.
1987 Women, Fire and Dangerous Things. Chicago University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1991 War and Metaphor. In P. Grzybek (ed.) Cultural semiotics: Facts and Facets: 73–92. Brockmeyer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2005 Don’t Think of an Elephant! Know Your Values and Frame the Debate. Chelsea Green.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
& M. Johnson 1980 Metaphors we Live by. Chicago University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lamy, B.
1969[1670] La rhétorique ou L’art de parler. Brighton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lanham, R.A.
1991 A Handlist of Rhetorical Terms. University of California Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lausberg, H.
1990 Handbuch der literarischen Rhetorik. Hueber.  MetBibGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leech, G.N.
1966 A Linguistic Guide to English Poetry. Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1983 Principles of Pragmatics. Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levelt, W.J.M.
1999 Producing spoken language: A blueprint of the speaker. In C.M. Brown & P. Hagoort (eds.) The Neurocognition of Language: 83–122. Oxford Univ.Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk
1993 Bilingual Thesaurus (BIT), Field Theory, and Cognitive Linguistics. In P.R. Lutzeier (ed.): 229–238.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Locke, J.
1975 An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lutzeier, P.R.
(ed.) 1993 Studien zur Wortfeldtheorie/Studies in Lexical Field Theory. Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marouzeau, J.
1935 Traité de stylistique. Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mccloskey, D.N.
1983 The Rhetoric of Economics. Journal of Economic Literature 21: 481–517.  MetBibGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Murphy, J.J.
1974 Rhetoric in the Middle Ages. University of California Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nash, W.
1989 Rhetoric. The Wit of Persuasion. Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nietzsche, F.
1969 Über Wahrheit und Lüge im außermoralischen Sinn. In K. Schlechta (Hg.) Friedrich Nietzsche. Werke III: 309–322. Ullstein.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ong, W.J.
1982 Orality and Literacy. The Technologizing of the Word. Methuen. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perelman, C. & L. Olbrechts-Tyteca
1983[1958] Traité de l’argumentation. La nouvelle rhétorique. Ed. Université de Bruxelles.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pielenz, M.
1993 Argumentation und Metapher. Narr.  MetBibGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Plett, H.F.
1975 Textwissenschaft und Textanalyse. Quelle & Meyer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1985 Rhetoric. In T.A. Van Dijk (ed.) Discourse and Literature: 59–84. Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Plett, H.F
2000 Systematische Rhetorik.Fink.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quintilianus
1970 Institutio oratoria. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ricœur, P.
1975 La métaphore vive. Seuil.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reinsdorf, W.
1993 Schizophrenia, Poetic Imagery and Metaphor. Imagination, Cognition and Personality 13(4): 335–345. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sandig, B.
1986 Stilistik der deutschen Sprache. de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmitz, A.
1990 Die oratorische Kunst Bachs. In J. Kopperschmidt (ed.): 290–312.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Searle, J.
1979 Expression and Meaning. Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sexl, M.
(ed.) 2004 Einführung in die Literaturtheorie. Wien.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spencer, J.R.
1957 Ut Rhetorica Pictura: A Study in Quattrocento Theory of Painting. Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institute 20: 26–44. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sperber, D. & D. Wilson
1986 Relevance. Communication and Cognition. Blackwell.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spillner, B.
1974 Linguistik und Literaturwissenschaft. Kohlhammer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spitzer, L.
1961 Stilstudien. Hueber.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Springfellow, F.
1994 The Meaning of Irony: A Psychoanalytic Investigation. State University of New York Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Todorov, T.
1967 Littérature et signification. Larousse. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1977 Théories du symbole. Seuil.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ueding, G.
1986 Grundriß der Rhetorik. Metzler.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Verschueren, J.
1998 Understanding Pragmatics. Arnold.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weinrich, H.
1976 Sprache in Texten. Klett.  MetBibGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weydt, H.
1987 Metaphern und Kognition. In J. Lüdtke (ed.) Energeia und Ergon: 303–311. Narr.  MetBibGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yu, N.
1998 The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor: A Perspective from Chinese. Benjamins.  BoP Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
 
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 jbe-platform.quadraat-sans-bold jbe-platform.quadraat-sans-bold-dark jbe-platform.quadraat-sans-bold-light jbe-platform.quadraat-sans-bold prag Twitter_Logo_Blue