Judith T. Irvine
Table of contents

As forms of social deixis engaging linguistic structure with social function, linguistic honorifics offer a rich field of investigation for students of pragmatics. Recent developments in research have deepened the theoretical basis of our understanding of honorifics. They have also shown that honorific phenomena are more widespread in the world’s languages, more various in form, and more creatively deployed, than was once supposed.

Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price.


Agha, A.
1988Honorific register and systems of deference in Lhasa Tibetan. Rev. paper, annual meeting of the American Anthropological Association.Google Scholar
1993Grammatical and indexical convention in honorific discourse. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 3: 131–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1994Honorification. Annual Review of Anthropology 23: 277–302. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beeman, W.O.
1986Language, status, and power in Iran. Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, P. & S.C. Levinson
1978Universals in language usage. In E. Goody (ed.) Questions and politeness: 56–311. Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
1987Politeness. Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Brown, R. & A. Gilman
1960The pronouns of power and solidarity. In T. Sebeok (ed.) Style in language: 253–276. MIT Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Bryant, A.T.
1949The Zulu people. Shuter & Shooter.Google Scholar
Capo, H.C.
1979Notes on language differentiation. Anthropological Linguistics 21: 419–42.Google Scholar
Delafosse, M.
1922Naissance et évolution d’un système d’écriture de création contemporaire. Revue d’Ethnographie et des Traditions Populaires 8: 11–19.Google Scholar
Dixon, R.W.M.
1971A method of semantic description. In D. Steinberg & L. Jakobovits (eds.) Semantics: 436–471. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Doke, C. & B.W. Vilakazi
1958Zulu-English dictionary (2nd ed.). Witwatersrand University Press.Google Scholar
Duranti, A.
1992Language in context and language as context. In A. Duranti & C. Goodwin (eds.) Rethinking context: 77–100. Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Errington, J.J.
1988Structure and style in Javanese. University of Pennsylvania Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
1992On the ideology of Indonesian language development. In P. Kroskrity , B. Schieffelin & K. Woolard (eds.): 417–426.Google Scholar
Geertz, C.
1960The religion of Java. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gonda, J.
1948The Javanese vocabulary of courtesy. Lingua 1: 333–76.Google Scholar
Harada, S.I.
1976Honorifics. In M. Shibatani (ed.) Syntax and Semantics, vol. 5: 499–561. Academic Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Haviland, J.B.
1979How to talk to your brother-in-law in Guugu Yimidhirr. In T. Shopen (ed.) Languages and their speakers: 161–239. Winthrop.Google Scholar
Head, B.
1978Respect degrees in pronominal reference. In J. Greenberg (ed.) Universals of human language 3: 151–212. Stanford University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Herbert, R.K.
1990aThe relative markedness of click sounds. Anthropological Linguistics 32: 120–138.Google Scholar
1990bThe sociohistory of clicks in Southern Bantu. Anthropological Linguistics 32: 295–315.Google Scholar
Hill, J. & K. Hill
1978Honorific usage in modern Nahuatl. Language 54: 123–155. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
1986Speaking Mexicano. University of Arizona Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Hoben, S.J.
1976The meaning of the second-person pronouns in Amharic. In M.L. Bender, J.D. Bowen, R.L. Cooper & C.A. Ferguson (eds.) Language in Ethiopia: 281–288. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hymes, D.H.
(ed.) 1964Language in culture and society. Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Inoue, K.
1979Japanese: A story of language and people. In T. Shopen (ed.) Languages and their speakers: 241–300. Winthrop.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Irvine, J.T.
1979Formality and informality in communicative events. American Anthropologist 81: 773–790. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1985Status and style in language. Annual Review of Anthropology 14: 557–581. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1992Ideologies of honorific language. In P. Kroskrity, B. Schieffelin & K. Woolard (eds.): 251–262.Google Scholar
Kroskrity, P. , B. Schieffelin & K. Woolard
1992Language Ideologies. Special issue, Pragmatics 2/3.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Lehr, M., J. Redden & A. Balima
1966Moré: Basic course. Foreign Service Inst.Google Scholar
Levinson, S.C.
1983Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1988Some putative universals of honorific systems. Paper, Honorifics Conference, Portland OR.
Martin, S.
1964Speech levels in Japan and Korea. In D. Hymes (ed.): 407–415.Google Scholar
Newman, S.
1955Vocabulary levels: Zuñi sacred and slang usage. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 11: 345–54. Repr. 1964. in Hymes (ed.): 397–406. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pumphrey, M.E.C.
1937Shilluk ‘royal’ language conventions. Sudan Notes and Records 20: 319–321.Google Scholar
Shibatani, M.
1990The languages of Japan. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Silverstein, M.
1976Shifters, linguistic categories, and cultural description. In K. Basso & H. Selby (eds.) Meaning in anthropology: 11–56. University of New Mexico Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
1979Language structure and linguistic ideology. In R. Clyne, W. Hanks & C. Hofbauer (eds.) The elements: 193–247. Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Wenger, J.R.
1982Some universals of honorific language with special reference to Japanese. PhD. Diss., University of Arizona.Google Scholar