Claudia Bianchi
Table of contents

Contextualism is a view about meaning, semantic content and truth-conditions, bearing significant consequences for the characterisation of explicit and implicit content, the decoding/inferring distinction and the semantics/pragmatics interface. According to the traditional perspective in semantics (called “literalism” or “semantic minimalism”), it is possible to attribute truth-conditions to a sentence independently of any context of utterance, i.e. in virtue of its meaning alone. We must then distinguish between the proposition literally expressed by a sentence (“what is said” by the sentence, its literal truth-conditions) and the implicit meaning of the sentence (“what is implicated” by a speaker uttering the sentence). Over the past forty years, however, an increasing number of linguists and philosophers have begun to underline the phenomenon of semantic underdetermination: the encoded meaning of the sentence employed by a speaker underdetermines the proposition explicitly expressed by an utterance of that sentence. According to the extreme version of this perspective – labelled “radical contextualism” – no sentence of a natural language expresses a complete proposition, or has fixed truth-conditions, even when unambiguous and devoid of indexicals. A sentence expresses a proposition only when completed and enriched with pragmatic constituents that do not correspond to any syntactic element of the sentence and yet are part of its semantic interpretation.

Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price.


Austin, J.
1961Philosophical Papers. J. Urmson & G. Warnock (eds.) 1979 3rd ed. Oxford University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Bach, K.
2001You don’t say? Synthèse 128: 15–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002Seemingly semantic intuitions. In J. Keim Campbell, M. O’ Rourke & D. Shier (eds.) Meaning and Truth: 21–33. Seven Bridges Press. Google Scholar
2004Minding the Gap. In C. Bianchi (ed.): 27–43. Google Scholar
Bezuidenhout, A.
2002Truth-Conditional Pragmatics. Philosophical Perspectives 16: 105–34.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Bianchi, C.
2003How to Refer: Objective Context vs. Intentional Context. In P. Blackburn et al. (eds.) Modeling and Using Context, CONTEXT ‘03, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 2680: 54–65. Springer. Google Scholar
2006‘Nobody loves me’: Quantification and context. Philosophical Studies 130: 377–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009Pragmatica cognitiva. I meccanismi della comunicazione. Laterza. Google Scholar
(ed.) 2004The Semantics/Pragmatics Distinction. CSLI Publications. Google Scholar
Borg, E.
2004Minimal Semantics. Clarendon Press. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
2007Minimalism versus Contextualism in Semantics. In G. Preyer & G. Peter (eds.) Context-Sensitivity and Semantic Minimalism. New Essays on Semantics and Pragmatics: 339–359. Oxford University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Cappelen, H. & E. Lepore
2005Insensitive Semantics. A Defense of Semantic Minimalism and Speech Act Pluralism. Blackwell.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Carston, R.
2002Thoughts and utterances: the pragmatics of explicit communication. Blackwell. DOI logo  MetBibGoogle Scholar
2004aRelevance Theory and the Saying/Implicating Distinction. In L.R. Horn & G. Ward (eds.) Handbook of Pragmatics: 633–656. Blackwell. Google Scholar
2004bTruth-Conditional Content and Conversational Implicature. In C. Bianchi (ed.): 65–100.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Corazza, E.
2007Contextualism, minimalism, and situationalism. Pragmatics and Cognition (1): 115–137. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Corazza, E. & J. Dokic
2007Sense and Insensibility Or Where Minimalism Meets Contextualism. In G. Preyer & G. Peter (eds.) Context-Sensitivity and Semantic Minimalism. New Essays on Semantics and Pragmatics: 169–193. Oxford University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Garcia-Carpintero, M. & M. Kölbel
(eds.) 2008Relative Truth. Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gauker, C.
1997Domain of Discourse. Mind 106: 1–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003Words without meaning. MIT Press. Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. & J. Moise
1997Pragmatics in Understanding What is Said. Cognition 62: 51–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grice, H.P.
1989Studies in the Way of Words. Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
Kaplan, D.
1989Afterthoughts. In J. Almog, J. Perry & H. Wettstein (eds.) Themes from Kaplan: 565–614. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Kölbel, M.
2008Introduction: Motivations for Relativism. In M. Garcia-Carpintero & M. Kölbel (eds.): 1–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Macfarlane, J.
2005Making Sense of Relative Truth. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 105: 321–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007Semantic Minimalism and Nonindexical Contextualism. In G. Preyer & G. Peter (eds.) Context-Sensitivity and Semantic Minimalism. New Essays on Semantics and Pragmatics: 240–250. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
2009Nonindexical Contextualism. Synthese 166: 231–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perry, J.
1986Thought without Representation. In J. Perry (ed.) 1993 The Problem of the Essential Indexical and Other Essays: 205–218. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
1998Indexicals, Contexts and Unarticulated Constituents. In A. Aliseda, R. Van Gabeek & D. Westerstahl (eds.) Computing Natural Language: 1–11. CSLI Publications. Google Scholar
Predelli, S.
2005aContexts. Meaning, Truth, and the Use of Language. Oxford University Press.  BoP DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005bPainted Leaves, Context, and Semantic Analysis. Linguistics and Philosophy 28: 351–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Recanati, F.
1993Direct Reference: From Language to Thought. Blackwell.  BoPGoogle Scholar
1995The Alleged Priority of Literal Interpretation. Cognitive Science 19: 207–232. DOI logo  MetBibGoogle Scholar
2001What is Said. Synthese 128: 75–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004aLiteral Meaning. Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
2004b‘What is said’ and the Semantics/Pragmatics Distinction. In C. Bianchi (ed.): 45–64. Google Scholar
2007Perspectival Thought. A Plea for (Moderate) Relativism. Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008Moderate Relativism. In M. Garcia-Carpintero & M. Kölbel (eds.): 41–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sbisa, M.
2009Contextualism without incompleteness. European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 5: 55–72. Google Scholar
Searle, J.
1979Expression and Meaning. Cambridge University Press. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
1980The Background of Meaning. In J. Searle, F. Kiefer & M. Bierwisch (eds.) Speech Act Theory and Pragmatics: 221–232. D. Reidel Publishing Company. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
1992The Rediscovery of the Mind. MIT Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Sperber, D. & D. Wilson
1986/1995Relevance. Communication and Cognition. Blackwell.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Stanley, J.
2000Context and logical form. Linguistics and Philosophy 23: 391–434. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Stanley, J. & Z. Szabò
2000On Quantifier Domain Restriction. Mind and Language 15(2): 219–261. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Szabò, Z.G.
2006Sensitivity training. Mind and Language 21(1): 31–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(ed.) 2005Semantics Versus Pragmatics. Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taylor, K.
2001Sex, breakfast, and descriptus interruptus. Synthese 128: 45–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Travis, Ch.
1975Saying and Understanding. Blackwell.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Travis, Ch
1981The True and the False: the Domain of Pragmatics. Benjamins. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Travis, Ch.
1985On What Is Strictly Speaking True. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 15: 187–229.  BoP DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1996Meaning's Role in Truth. Mind 105: 451–466. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Travis, Ch
1997Pragmatics. In B. Hale & C. Wright (eds.) A Companion to the Philosophy of Language: 87–107. Blackwell.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Turner, K.
(ed.) 1999The Semantics/Pragmatics Interface from Different Points of View (Current Research in the Semantics/Pragmatics Interface, vol. 1). Elsevier.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Waismann, F.
1940Verifiability. In A. Flew (ed.) 1951 Logic and Language. Blackwell. Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L.
1953Philosophische Untersuchungen. Blackwell.  BoPGoogle Scholar