Linguistic explanation

William FrawleyRoberta Michnick Golinkoff
Table of contents

Linguistic explanation is intelligible only against the backdrop of explanations generally. This in turn requires an examination of the relationship of explanations to theories and an appreciation of the findings of recent metascience on the nature of scientific inquiry. In this way, the principles of explanation can be seen to frame both linguistic and pragmatic explanation.

Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price.


Bernstein, R.J.
1983Beyond objectivism and relativism. University of Pennsylvania Press. Google Scholar
Botha, R.
1989Challenging Chomsky. Blackwell. Google Scholar
1992Twentieth century conceptions of language. Blackwell. Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P.
1991Language and symbolic power. Polity Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Burge, T.
1989Wherein is language social?In A. George (ed.) Reflections on Chomsky: 175–191. Blackwell. Google Scholar
Chomsky, N.
1965Aspects of the theory of syntax. MIT Press. Google Scholar
1986Knowledge of language. Praeger.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Churchland, P.
1986Neurophilosophy. MIT Press. Google Scholar
Clark, H.
1979Responding to indirect speech acts. Cognitive Psychology 11: 430–477. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Corsaro, W.
1985Sociological approaches to discourse analysis. In T. Van Dijk (ed.) Handbook of discourse analysis, vol. 1: 167–192. Academic Presscademic Press. Google Scholar
Duranti, A.
1985Sociocultural dimensions of discourse. In T. Van Dijk (ed.) Handbook of discourse analysis, vol. 1: 193–230. Academic Presscademic Press. Google Scholar
Fairclough, N.
1992Discourse and social change. Polity Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Feyerabend, P.
1975Against method. New Left. Google Scholar
Fodor, J.
1981Representations. MIT Press. Google Scholar
Foucault, M.
1972The archaeology of knowledge. Harper & Row. Google Scholar
Gazdar, G.
1979Pragmatics. Academic Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R.W.
1983Do people always process the literal meanings of indirect requests? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 9: 524–533. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givón, T.
1979On understanding grammar. Academic Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
1989Mind, code and context. Erlbaum.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Grice, H.P.
1975Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (eds.) Syntax and Semantics, vol. 3: 41–58. Academic Presscademic Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
1978Further notes on logic and conversation. In P. Cole (ed.) Syntax and Semantics, vol. 9: 113–128. Academic Presscademic Press. Google Scholar
Habermas, J.
1970Towards a theory of communicative competence. Inquiry 13: 360–375. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Harris, R.
1987The language machine. Cornell University Press. Google Scholar
Hempel, C.
1965Aspects of scientific explanation. Free Press. Google Scholar
Hodge, R. & G. Kress
1993Language as ideology. Routledge.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Hopper, P.
1988Emergent grammar and the a priori grammar postulate. In D. Tannen (ed.) Linguistics in context: 117–134. Ablex. Google Scholar
Hymes, D.
1972On communicative competence. In J. Pride & J. Holmes (eds.) Sociolinguistics: 269–285. Penguin.  BoPGoogle Scholar
1974Foundations in sociolinguistics. University of Pennsylvania Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
1989Postscript. Applied Linguistics 10: 244–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Itkonen, E.
1978Grammatical theory and metascience. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1983Causality in linguistic theory. Indiana University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Katz, J.
1981Language and other abstract objects. Rowman & Littlefield.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, T.
1962The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
Lakoff, G.
1987Women, fire and dangerous things. University of Chicago Press. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R.
1987Foundations of cognitive grammar. Stanford University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Levinson, S.
1983Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
1987Pragmatics and the grammar of anaphora. Journal of Linguistics 23: 379–434. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Little, D.
1991Varieties of social explanation. Westview Press. Google Scholar
Lyotard, J-F.
1984The postmodern condition. University of Minnesota Press. Google Scholar
Popper, K.
1963Conjectures and refutations. Routledge. Google Scholar
Quine, W.V.O.
1960Word and object. MIT Press. Google Scholar
Radford, A.
1990Syntactic theory and the acquisition of English syntax. Blackwell. Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. , G. Jefferson & H. Sacks
1977The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language 53: 361–382. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, D.
1987Discourse markers. Cambridge University Press. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Searle, J.
1969Speech acts. Cambridge University Press. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
1992The rediscovery of the mind. MIT Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Shatz, M.
1978On the development of communicative understandings: An early strategy for interpreting and responding to messages. Cognitive Psychology 10: 271–301. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Shotter, J.
1993Cultural politics of everyday life. University of Toronto Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Sperber, D. & D. Wilson
1986Relevance. Blackwell.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Stowell, T.
1981Origins of phrase structure. PhD. Diss. MIT. Google Scholar
Vanderveken, D.
1990/1991Meaning and speech acts, 2 vols. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Wexler, K. & P. Culicover
1980Formal principles of language acquisition. MIT Press. Google Scholar