Philosophically, Marxism is a branch of Hegelianism. According to the ‘dialectics’ of Hegel, history would develop towards its point of self-fulfillment in a process in which contradictory principles (‘thesis’ and ‘antithesis’) merge into a synthesis — which again evokes its own contradiction. Marxism shares the optimism about historical progress inherent in this view. While Hegel, however, saw this development — idealistically — as a coming to itself of the Spirit (Geist), Marx considered the process — materialistically — as taking place in the everyday social circumstances of people, especially in the struggle that settles their economic relationships. Whereas the dynamic principle that Hegelianism introduced in its view of history remained rather abstract, Marxism relates this principle to concrete historical relationships between people (in Marx’s times, to class relationships). Therefore, Marxism is in a position to criticize idealism as being too academic; in case of social oppression and exploitation, it is not mental change, but material change which is called for. The urge to emancipate the oppressed leads to a political drive opposite to that of Hegelianism, which is expressed in the adage of historical materialism: the economic base determines the ideological superstructures (and not the other way around). The direction of this determinism has been the moving force of Marxist sciences, but the very adoption of determinism proved to be its central weakness as well. This is especially clear in Marxist attempts to develop a theory of language.
References
Althusser, L.
1971Ideology and ideological state apparatuses. In L. Althusser, Lenin and philosophy and other essays: 127–186. Monthly Review Press.
Atkinson, P.
1971Language structure and reproduction. Methuen. BoP
Baudrillard, J.
1972Pour une critique de l’économie politique du signe. Gallimard.
1989Linguists of all countries …! On Gramsci’s premise of coherence. Journal of Pragmatics 13: 547–566.
Höppe, W.
1982Karl Marx Friedrich Engels: Sprache und gesellschaftlicher Gesamtkomplex. Bouvier.
Houdebine, J-L.
1977Langage et marxisme. Klincksieck.
Labov, W.
1970The logic of nonstandard English. In J.E. Alatis (ed.) Report of the 20th annual round table meeting on linguistics and language studies: 1–43. Georgetown University Press. BoP
Lo, Piparo F.
1979Lingua intellettuali, egemonia in Gramsci. Laterza.
Maldidier, D.
1990L’inquiétude du discours. Éditions des Cendres. BoP
Marcellesi, J-B.
1977Langage et classes sociales. Langages46.
Marcellesi, J-B. & B. Gardin
1974Introduction à la sociolinguistique. Larousse.
Marr, N.J.
(1974) [1927]Die japhetitische Theorie. In T. Borbé, Kritik der marxistischen Sprachtheorie N.Ja. Marr’s. Scriptor.
Marx, K. & F. Engels
1974Über Sprache, Stil und Übersetzung. Dietz.
Mey, J.L.
1985Whose language? John Benjamins.
Morson, G.S. & C. Emerson
1990Mikhail Bakhtin Creation of a prosaics. Stanford University Press.
Pêcheux, M.
1982Language semantics and ideology. Macmillan. BoP
Schaff, A.
1962Introduction to semantics. Pergamon.
Stalin, J.
1951On Marxism in Linguistics. In The Soviet Linguistic Controversy: 70–76. King’s Crown Press.
Thomas, L.L.
1957The linguistic theories of N. Ja. Marr. University of California Press.
Todorov, T.
1984Mikhail Bakhtin The dialogical principle. Manchester University Press.
Vološinov, V.N.
1986Marxism and the philosophy of language. Harvard University Press. BoP