Philosophical studies of natural language serve two purposes: (a) They enhance our understanding of the role played by language within the framework of major facets of human life, such as thought, knowledge or scientific explanation, and (b) they enhance our understanding of language itself. Pragmatics, in some sense of the term, has been involved in the pursuit of each of these purposes. A particularly illuminating example of how pragmatics, in a sense, appears in a philosophical study of language of type (a) is Bas van Fraassen’s philosophical theory of scientific explanation (van Fraassen 1980). Van Fraassen’s starting point is the threefold division of properties and relations into syntactic, semantic and pragmatic, as introduced by Charles Morris and used in Morris (1955). Applying this division to theories in science, an interesting distinction emerges between syntactic aspects of a theory, such as the property of consistency, semantic aspects thereof, such as empirical adequacy and verisimilitude, and presently most interestingly, its pragmatic aspects, such as context-dependency. Van Fraassen’s view is that “the language of theory appraisal, and specifically the term ‘explains’ is radically context-dependent” (1980: 91). On van Fraassen’s view, an explanation is an answer to a ‘why?’-question about certain facts, as compared to certain contextually determined alternatives that are not the case: ‘why does this material burn yellow, rather than …?’. Moreover, an explanation involves not only certain facts and certain contrastive alternatives, but also a contextually determined respect in which an answer is sought to the ‘why?’-question. In one respect, the question ‘why does the blood circulate through the body?’ is related to causal answers in terms of the heart pumping the blood through the arteries, while in another respect, the question is related to functional answers in terms of bringing oxygen to every part of the body tissue.
References
Almog, J., J. Perry & H. Wettstein
(eds.)1989Themes from Kaplan. Oxford University Press.
Austin, J.L.
1962How to do things with words. Oxford University Press.
Austin, J.L.
1970[1950] ‘Intelligent behaviour’, a critical review of Gilbert Ryle’s ‘The concept of mind’. In O.P. Wood & G. Pitcher (eds.) Ryle: 45–51. Macmillan.
Bach, K. & R.M. Harnish
1979Linguistic communication and speech acts. MIT Press. BoP
Baker, G.P. & P.M.S. Hacker
1980Wittgenstein, understanding and meaning. Blackwell.
Baker, G.P. & P.M.S. Hacker
1985Wittgenstein, rules, grammar and necessity. Blackwell.
1979Moods and performances. In A. Margalit (ed.): 9–20.
Davidson, D.
1984. Inquiries into truth and interpretation. Clarendon Press.
Davidson, D.
1986A nice derangement of epitaphs. InLePore (ed.): 433–446. MetBib
Davis, S.
1979Speech acts, performance and competence. Journal of Pragmatics 3: 497–505. BoP
Donnellan, K.
1966Reference and definite descriptions. Philosophical Review 65: 281–304. BoP
Dowty, D.R., R.E. Wall & S. Peters
1981Introduction to Montague semantics. Reidel.
Dummett, M.
1989Language and communication. In A. George (ed.) Reflections on Chomsky: 192–212. Blackwell. BoP
Dummett, M.
1991The logical basis of metaphysics. Duckworth.
Van Fraassen, B.C.
1980The scientific image. Clarendon Press.
Grice, H.P.
1989Studies in the way of words. Harvard University Press.
Hilpinen, R.
(ed.)1971Deontic logic. Reidel.
Hintikka, J.
1986Logic of conversation as a logic of dialogue. In R.E. Grandy & R. Warner (eds.) Philosophical grounds of rationality: 259–276. Oxford University Press. BoP
Kaplan, D.
1979On the logic of demonstratives. In P.A. French, T.E. Uehling & H.K. Wettstein (eds.) Contemporary perspectives in the philosophy of language: 401–412. University of Minnesota Press. BoP
Kaplan, D.
1989aDemonstratives. In J. Almog, J. Perry & H. Wettstein (eds.): 481–563.
Kaplan, D.
1989bAfterthoughts. In J. Almog, J. Perry & H. Wettstein (eds.): 565–614.
Kasher, A.
1976Conversational maxims and rationality. In A. Kasher (ed.) Language in focus: 197–216. Reidel. BoP
Kasher, A.
1979What is a theory of use? In A. Margalit (ed.): 37–55.
Kasher, A.
1991Pragmatics and Chomsky’s research program. In A. Kasher (ed.): 122–149.
Kasher, A.
(ed.)1991The Chomskyan turn. Blackwell.
Kripke, S.
1977Speaker’s reference and semantic reference. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 2: 255–276. BoP
Lappin, S.
1991Concepts of logical form in linguistics and philosophy. In A. Kasher (ed.): 300–333.
1959Towards a systematic pragmatics. North-Holland.
Morris, C.
1946Signs, language and behavior. Prentice Hall. BoP
Morris, C.
1955Foundations of the theory of signs. In O. Neurath, R. Carnap & C. Morris (eds.) Foundations of the unity of science, vol. 1: 63–137. University of Chicago Press. BoP
Pateman, T.
1987Language in mind and language in society. Clarendon Press. BoP
