Sperber & Wilson’s relevance theory, presented most fully in Sperber & Wilson (1986), is an approach to communication and utterance understanding based on a general view of cognition. In contrast with formal approaches to pragmatics (e.g. Gazdar 1979) and socio-cultural approaches (e.g. Leech 1983), relevance theory views pragmatic interpretation as a psychological matter involving inferential computations performed over mental representations, governed by a single cognitive principle. The assumption underlying this approach is that the mind is modular, and, in particular, that there is a distinction between linguistic computations and representations on the one hand, and non-linguistic computations and representations on the other. It is this psychological distinction which, according to relevance theory, underlies the distinction between semantics and pragmatics.
References
Austin, J.L.
1962How to do things with words. Clarendon Press.
Blakemore, D.
1987Semantic constraints on relevance. Blackwell.
Blakemore, D.
1988‘So’ as a constraint on relevance. In R. Kempson (ed.): 183–195.
Blakemore, D.
1991Performatives and parentheticals. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 91: 197–214.
1985/6Loose talk. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 86: 153–171. BoP
Sperber, D. & D. Wilson
1987Precis of ‘Relevance’. Behavioural and Brain Sciences 10: 697–754.
Sperber, D. & D. Wilson
1990Rhetoric and relevance. In D. Wellbery & J. Bender (eds.) The ends of rhetoric: 140–145. Stanford University Presstanford University Press.
Wilson, D. & D. Sperber
1981On Grice’s theory of conversation. In P. Werth (ed.) Conversation and discourse: 155–178. Croom Helm. BoP
Wilson, D. & D. Sperber
1986aPragmatics and modularity. In A. Farley, P. Farley & K. Mccullough (eds.) Chicago Linguistics Society 22, Part 2: 67–84. BoP
Wilson, D. & D. Sperber
1986bInference and implicature. In C. Travis (ed.) Meaning and interpretation: 45–76. Blackwell. BoP
Wilson, D. & D. Sperber
1988Mood and the analysis of non-declarative sentences. In J. Dancyet al. (eds.) Human agency: 77–101. Stanford University Presstanford University Press. BoP