Many problems that we now consider as proper to speech act theory have already been formulated or at least hinted at on other occasions during the history of Western philosophy and linguistics. Philosophers have been concerned with the relation between the meaning of words, the expression of a proposition, and the act of assertion. Aristotle distinguished between the meaning of words and the assertiveness of declarative sentences (Perì Hermeneias 16b 26–30). Philosophers of language, rhetoricians and linguists have been aware of the variety of uses or functions of language. The Greek sophist Protagoras was probably the first to classify modes of discourse which roughly corresponded to kinds of speech acts; the theory of language of the Stoics, which was to become very influential for the development of grammatical studies, distinguished judgements, which alone are true or false, from wh-questions, polar questions, imperatives and expressions of wish, correlating their function with their grammatical form.
References
Apel, K.O.
1991Is intentionality more basic than linguistic meaning?In E. Lepore & R. Van Gulick (eds.): 31–55.
Austin, J.L.
1946Other Minds. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. Suppl. vol. 20.
——
1961Philosophical papers. Oxford University Press.
——
1962How to do things with words. Oxford University Press.
Bach, K. & R.M. Harnish
1979Linguistic communication and speech acts. MIT Press. BoP
Ballmer, T.T
. & W. Brennenstuhl1981Speech act classification. Springer.
Benveniste, E
1966Problèmes de linguistique générale. Gallimard. BoP
Berlin, I
et al.1973Essays on J. L. Austin. Oxford University Press.
Black, M.
(ed.)1964Philosophy in America. Allen & Unwin. BoP