Implicature and language change

Kate Kearns
Table of contents

The basic components of semantic change are the two processes represented in (1).

Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price.

References

Aijmer, K.
1985 The semantic development of will . In J. Fisiak (ed.): 11–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Atlas, J.D. & S.C. Levinson
1981  It-clefts, informativeness, and logical form: radical pragmatics (Revised Standard Version). In P. Cole (ed.). Radical pragmatics: 1–61. Academic Press. Google Scholar
Bybee, J. & W. Pagliuca
1987 The evolution of future meaning. In Papers from the 7th International Conference on Historical Linguistics: 109–122. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J., R. Perkins & W. Pagliuca
1994 The evolution of grammar: tense, aspect and modality in the languages of the world.. University of Chicago Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Fisiak, J.
(ed.) 1986 Historical semantics: Historical word-formation. Mouton. Google Scholar
Geeraerts, D.
1997 Diachronic prototype semantics: a contribution to historical lexicology. Clarendon Press. Google Scholar
Geis, M. & A. Zwicky
1971 On invited inferences. Linguistic Inquiry 2: 561–6.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Grice, H.P.
1975 Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J.L. Morgan (eds.) Speech Acts: 41–58. Academic Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Heine, B.
1997 Cognitive foundations of grammar. Oxford University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Heine, B., U. Claudi & F. Hünnemeyer
1991 Grammaticalization: a conceptual framework. University of Chicago Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Hopper, P.J. & E. Traugott
1993 Grammaticalization. Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Horn, L.R.
1984 Toward a new taxonomy for pragmatic inference: Q-based and R-based implicature. In D. Schiffrin (ed.). Meaning form and use in context: linguistic applications: 11–42. Georgetown University Press. Google Scholar
1989 A natural history of negation. Chicago University Press. Google Scholar
Kempson, R.
1980 Ambiguity and word meaning. In S. Greenbaum, G. Leech & J. Svartvik (eds.) Studies in English linguistics: 7–16. Longman.Google Scholar
König, E.E.
1985 Where do concessives come from? On the development of concessive connectives. In J. Fisiak (ed.): 263–82.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. & M. Johnson
1980 Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Levinson, S.C.
1983 Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Lipka, L.
1985 Inferential features in historical semantics. In J. Fisiak (ed.): 339–54.Google Scholar
Sperber, D. & D. Wilson
1986 Relevance: Communication and cognition. Harvard University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Stern, G.
1931 Meaning and change of meaning. Elanders Boktryckeri Aktiebolag. Google Scholar
Sweetser, E.E.
1990 From etymology to pragmatics: metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge University Press. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Talmy, L.
1988 Force dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive Science 12: 49–100. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Taylor, J.
1989 Linguistic categorization: Prototypes in linguistic theory. Clarendon Press.  MetBibGoogle Scholar
Traugott, E.C.
1989 On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: an example of subjectification in semantic change. Language 65: 31–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, E.C. & E. König
1991 The semantics-pragmatics of grammaticalization revisited. In E.C. Traugott & B. Heine (eds.) Approaches to grammaticalization vol 1: 189–218. John Benjamins. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Warren, B.
1992 Sense developments: a contrastive study of the development of slang senses and novel standard senses in English. Almqvist & Wiksell International.  BoPGoogle Scholar