Indeterminacy and negotiation
Table of contents
Linguistic meaning has been considered as determined not only by common sense but also by the mainstream paradigm in language studies which rests on an often implicit postulate of determinacy, according to which a unique meaning should correspond to a given linguistic form. This paradigm has been challenged both by those who refuse to consider linguistic meaning as an objective representation of the world (e.g. Putnam 1981; Johnson 1987), and by those who analyse human communication as involving an interactional effort to produce meaning (e.g. Mey 1987; Sarangi & Slembrouck 1992; Thomas 1995; Verschueren 1999).
References
Aronsson, K.
Blum-Kulka, S.
Candlin, C. & K. Lotfipour-Saedi
Channell, J.
Chierchia, G.
Cole, P. & J. Morgan
Ducrot, O.
Gillon, B.
Green, G.
Grice, H.
Groenendijk, J., M. Stokhof & F. Veltman
Gumperz, J.
Johnson, M.
1987 The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination and reason. University of Chicago Press. BoP
Kamp, H.
Kamp, H. & U. Reyle
Kempson, R.
Leech, G.
Levinson, S.
Markova, I. & K. Foppa
Moura, H.
1997 La comparaison: reestructuration de categories. Proceedings of the XVIth International Congress of Linguists. Paper 269. Elsevier.
Parret, H. & J. Verschueren
Poesio, M.
Pustejovsky, J.
Ravin, Y. & C. Leacock
Reddy, M.
1979 The conduit metaphor: a case of frame conflict in our language about language. In A. Ortony (ed.) Metaphor and thought: 284–324. Cambridge University Press. BoP
Rommetveit, R.
Roulet, E.
Sadock, J.
Sarangi, S. & S. Slembrouck
1992 Non-cooperation in communication: a reassessment of Gricean pragmatics. Journal of Pragmatics 17:117–154. BoP
Searle, J.
Thomas, J.
VanDeemter K. & S. Peters
Van Dijk, T.
Verschueren, J.