Interjections

Felix K. Ameka & David P. Wilkins
Table of contents

One short interjection may be more powerful, more to the point, more eloquent than a long speech. (Müller 1860:368)

Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price.

References

Aijmer, K.
2002 English discourse particles: evidence from a corpus. John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ameka, F.K.
1992a Interjections: the universal yet neglected part of speech. Journal of Pragmatics 18: 101–118. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1992b The meaning of phatic and conative interjections. Journal of Pragmatics 18: 245–271. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(ed.) 1992c Special issue on Interjections. Journal of Pragmatics 18(2/3).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1994 The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. In R.E. Asher & J.E. Simpson (eds.). 1712–1715. Elsevier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ameka, F.K. & D.P. Wilkins
1996 Semantics. In H. Goebl, P.H. Nelde, Z. Stary & W. Wölck (eds.) Contact linguistics: an international handbook of contemporary research: 130–138. Walter de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Asano, Y.
1997 Acquisition of English Interjections Ouch, Yuck, and Oops in Early Childhood. Colorado Research in Linguistics 15: 1–15. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barberis, J -M.
1995 L’Interjection: de l’affect a la parade, et retour. Faits de Langues 6: 93–104. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beeching, K.
2002 Gender, politeness and pragmatic particles in French. John Benjamins.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bitti, P. & I. Poggi
1991 Symbolic nonverbal behaviour: Talking through gestures. In R.S. Feldman & B. Rim (eds.) Fundamentals of nonverbal behavior: 431–457. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bloomfield, L.
1933 Language. George Allen and Unwin.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bredel, U.
2000 Ach so-Eine Rekonstruktion aus funktionalpragmatischer Perspektive. Linguistische Berichte 184: 401–21. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bres, J.
1995 “-Hou! Haa! Yrraa”: interjection, exclamation, actualisation. Faits de Langues 6: 81–91. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bühler, K.
1934 Sprachtheorie. Fischer [Reprinted 1965. Fischer].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Caron-Pargue, J. & J. Caron
1995 La Fonction cognitive des interjections. Faits de Langues 6: 111–120. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Caron-Pargue, J. & J. Caron Laco
2000 Les Interjections comme marqueurs du fonctionnement cognitif. Cahiers de praxematique 34: 51–76. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chambon, J -P.
1992 Verbes et noms delocutifs tires de huchements: esquisse d’une classification. ITL, Review of Applied Linguistics 97–98: 27–45.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, H. & J. Tree
2002 Using eh and um in spontaneous speaking. Cognition 84: 73–111. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
D’atri, A.
1995 The theory of interjections in Vico and Rousseau. In L. Formigari & D. Gambarara (eds.) Historical roots of linguistic theories: 115–127. John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Bruyn, P.S.
1998 Pragmatiese merkers: die verwaarloosde rededeel [Pragmatic Markers: The Neglected Part of Speech]. South African Journal of Linguistics 16: 127–35. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Drescher, M.
1997 French interjections and their use in discourse: ah dis donc les vieux souvenirs . In S. Niemeier & R. Dirven (eds.). The language of emotions: Conceptualization, expression, and theoretical foundation: 233–246. John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2000 Eh tabarnouche! c’etait bon. Pour une approche communicative des jurons en francais quebecois. Cahiers de praxematique 34: 133–160. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ehlich, K.
1986 Interjektionen. Niemeyer.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evans, N.
1992 ‘Wanjh! Bonj! Nja!’: sequential organization and social deixis in Mayali interjections. Journal of Pragmatics 18: 225–244.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Faure, L.
2000 Actualisation et production interjective du sens: le cas de la forme vocalique oh. Cahiers de praxematique 34: 77–105. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Foolen, A.
1997 The expressive function of language: Toward a cognitive semantic approach. In S. Niemeier & R. Dirven (eds.) The language of emotion: conceptualisation expression, and theoretical foundations: 15–32. John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fraser, B.
1999 What are discourse markers? Journal of Pragmatics 31: 931–952.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goffman, E.
1981 Forms of talk. Basil Blackwell.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hayasi, T.
1998 Gender Differences in Modern Turkish Discourse. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 129: 117–126.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jakobson, R.
1960 Linguistics and poetics. In T. Sebeok (ed.). Style in language: 350–377. MIT Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
James, D.
1972 Some aspects of the syntax and semantics of interjections. CLS 8: 162–172.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1973a The syntax and semantics of some English interjections. PhD dissertation. University of Michigan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1973b Another look at, say, some grammatical constraints on oh, interjections and hesitations. CLS 9: 242–251.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1978 The use of oh, ah, say, and well in relation to a number of grammatical phenomena. Papers in Linguistics 11: 517–535. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Janney, R.W.
1999 Words as gestures. Journal of Pragmatics 31: 953–972. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Karcevski, S.
1969 Introduction à l’étude de l’interjection. In R. Godel (ed.) The Geneva school reader in linguistics: 196–212. Indiana University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kendon, A.
1992 Some recent work from Italy on Quotable gestures (emblems) . Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 2: 92–104. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kockelman, P.
2003 The meanings of interjections in Q’eqchi’ Maya: From emotive reaction to social and discursive action. Current Anthropology 44: 467–90. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kryk-Kastovsky, B.
1997 Surprise, surprise,: The iconicity-conventionality scale. In S. Niemeier & R. Dirven (eds.). The language of emotions: 155–74. John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levelt, W.J.
1989 Speaking. MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levinson, S.C.
2000 Presumptive meanings. MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maschler, Y.
2000 Discourse markers in bilingual conversation. Special issue of the International Journal of Bilingualism 4 (4).
Meng, K. & S. Schrabback
1999 Interjections in adult-child discourse: The cases of German HM and NA. Journal of Pragmatics 31: 1263–1287.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Montes, R.G.
1999 The development of discourse markers in Spanish: Interjections. Journal of Pragmatics 31: 1289–1319. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Müller, M.
1862 Lectures on the science of language. Charles Scribner.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nubling, D.
2001 Von oh mein Jesus! zu oje! Der Interjektionalisierungspfad von dersekundaren zur primaren Interjektion. Deutsche Sprache 29: 20–45. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’connell, D.C, S. Kowal & E.J. Dill Iii
2004 Dialogicality in TV news interviews. Journal of Pragmatics 36: 185–205.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Olivier, C.
2000 L’Interjection Mon Dieu: variabilite semantique et situations de discours. Cahiers de praxematique 34: 161–89. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Poggi, I.
1981 Le interiezioni. Boringhieri.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reisigl, M.
1997 “Teixl die Frage hab,’ich mir nie gestellt”: Zur diskursiven Multifunktionalitat sekundarer Interjektionen. Wiener Linguistische Gazette 60–61: 89–112.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosier, L.
2000 Interjection subjectivite, expressivite et discours rapporte a l,’ecrit: petits effets d’un petit discours. Cahiers de praxematique 34: 19–49. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sapir, E.
1920 Language. Harcourt, Brace.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schelfhout, C., P.A. Coppen & N. Oostdijk
2003 Positions of Parentheticals and Interjections: A Corpus-Based Approach. Linguistics in the Netherlands 20: 155–66. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schiffrin, D.
1987 Discourse markers. Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schourup, L.
2001 Rethinking well. Journal of Pragmatics 33: 1025–60.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Soriano, A.S.
1999 L’Interjection dans la BD: reflexions sur sa traduction. Meta 44: 582–603. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stankiewicz, E.
1964 Problems of emotive language. In T. Sebeok, A. Hayes & M.C. Bateson (eds.) Approaches to semiotics: 239–264. Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, I.
1995 Interjections in Early Modern English: From imitation of spoken to conventions of written language. In A.H. Jucker (ed.). Historical Pragmatics: pragmatic developments in the history of English: 439–465. John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Waas, M. & A. Ryan
1993 Onomatopoeia in Language Attrition. Linguitische Berichte 148: 477–482. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wharton, T.
2003 Interjections language, and the ,‘Showing/Saying’ continuum. Pragmatics & Cognition 11: 39–91.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, A.
1992 The semantics of interjections. Journal of Pragmatics 18: 159–192. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1999 Emotions across languages and cultures. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2003[1991] Cross-cultural pragmatics: the semantics of human interaction. Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilkins, D.P.
1992 Interjections as deictics. Journal of Pragmatics 18: 119–158.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1995 Expanding the traditional category of deictic elements. In J. Duchan, G. Bruder & L. Hewitt (eds.) Deixis in narrative: A cognitive science perspective: 359–386.Lawrence Erlbaum. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1996 Morphology. In H. Goebl, P.H. Nelde, Z. Stary & W. Wölck (eds.) Contact linguistics: an international handbook of contemporary research: 109–117. Walter de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
 
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 jbe-platform.quadraat-sans-bold jbe-platform.quadraat-sans-bold-dark jbe-platform.quadraat-sans-bold-light jbe-platform.quadraat-sans-bold prag Twitter_Logo_Blue