Social semiotics

Jeff Bezemer & Carey Jewitt
Table of contents

Social semiotics is concerned with meaning makers and meaning making. It studies the media of dissemination and the modes of communication that people use and develop to represent their understanding of the world and to shape power relations with others. It draws on qualitative, fine-grained analysis of records of meaning making, such as ‘artifacts’, ‘texts’, and ‘transcripts’, to examine the production and dissemination of discourse across the variety of social and cultural contexts within which meaning is made. Different ‘versions’ of social semiotics have emerged since the publication of Michael Halliday's Language as Social Semiotic in 1978. The account we offer in this paper is focused on the version proposed by Gunther Kress, Robert Hodge, Theo van Leeuwen, and others. Following a historical overview we discuss its connections with pragmatics and other approaches; key concepts; analytical focus; and fields of application.

Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price.

References

Fairclough, N.
2003 Analysing Discourse. Textual analysis for social research. Routledge.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, J.J.
1999 On interactional sociolinguistic method. In S. Saranghi & C. Roberts (eds.) Talk, work and institutional order. Discourse in medical, mediation and management settings: 453–471. Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M.
1978 Language as Social Semiotic. Edward Arnold.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Hodge, R.
2009 Social Semiotics. In P. Bouissac (ed.) Semiotics Encyclopedia Online. http://​www​.semioticon​.com​/seo​/S​/social​_semiotics​.html. [Retrieved 15 February 2009.]  BoPGoogle Scholar
Hodge, R. & G. Kress
1988 Social Semiotics. Polity Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Jewitt, C.
(ed) 2009 The Routledge Handbook for Multimodal Analysis. Routledge. Google Scholar
Kress, G.
1993 Against Arbitrariness: the social production of the sign as a foundational issue in critical discourse analysis. Discourse and Society 4(2): 169–193. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
forthcoming). Multimodality. Routledge.
Kress, G. & R. Hodge
1979 Language as Ideology. Routledge.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Kress, G. & T. Van Leeuwen
1996 Reading Images: The Grammar Of Visual Design. Routledge.  BoPGoogle Scholar
2001 Multimodal Discourse. The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. Edward Arnold.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Lemke, J.
2002 Travels in Hypermodality. Visual Communication 1(3): 299–325. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
New London Group
1996 A pedagogy of multiliteracies. Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review 66: 60–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O'toole, M.
1994 The Language of Displayed Art. Leicester University Press. Google Scholar
Van Leeuwen, T.
2005 Introducing Social Semiotics. Routledge. Google Scholar