Sufi terminology and aspects of interaction with symbols: An investigation into the orientalists’ approaches to the study and translation of Sufi terms: The case of Massignon

Khalid Elyaboudi, Abdelhamid Zahid & Hassane Darir
Abstract

The Sufi (mystical) experience is characterized by a constant quest for the divine secrets in the universe: the mysteries of life and death, soul and spirit, and the mind and the heart. This experience varies from one ʿĀrif (Gnostic, Sufi Knower) to another according to the relevant pattern of connection between the individual self (al-̱dāt al-fardiyya) of the Sufi and the global self of the supreme monism (al-ḏāt al-kulliyya li al-’uḥadiyya al-ʿulyā).

It is clear that the universe or existence itself provide innumerable symbols and unfathomable signs. It is not surprising then that the Sufi discourse is founded on the ‘symbol’, which is a problematic word whose meaning is hidden in common speech and is, therefore, only grasped by the Sufis. Synonymous with a sign, whose meaning is hidden from a speaker because it is so subtle, it is also synonymous with a ‘hint’.

Symbolism has spread through Sufi poetic and prose writings because it was needed. The Sufi express meanings and psychological sensations which are not within the expressive capacity of language. They long to transfer their experience, but this experience can only be expressed by using a set of symbols that hint but lack clarity.

In this article we address the symbols employed by the Sufis to express their thoughts in translating the set of facts and secrets that Allah revealed to them after a long struggle. We formulate the problematics of this research as follows: How was it possible for the people of the Sufi Order to resort to symbolism, which usually indicates ambiguity and secretiveness, in coining terms to name the concepts and ideas that are inspired to them or that penetrate their inner souls? In this regard, we raise the following questions: Is the symbol a sign? a term? a word? an icon? a signal? a subtlety? a fragment (šaḏara)? a piece of wisdom (ḥikma)? a proverb? a metaphor? or a case of polysemy? Or is it all of this at the same time? What criteria enable Sufi words to contain both symbolic and terminological dimensions? What is the role of context (or pragmatic field) in identifying the essence of the Sufi symbol? How can we uncover the nucleus of the symbol from its external shell? How can we unveil the essence of symbols? What is the best approach to study symbols? Can we reduce symbols to semantic features following Rastier (1987), to highlight their essential meaning and extract their original nucleus? Or is this deconstructive approach useless in our treatment of the multifaceted symbol?

We will consider orientalist approaches (through Louis Massignon’s model) in the study of Sufi terminological systems by identifying their links with Islamic and gnostic origins and considering their modes of transfer into Western languages.

Keywords:
Table of contents

Since ancient times, the difficulties of identifying the boundaries of symbols has constituted a complex for Western people. The Sufis’ writings, on the other hand, welcomed this characteristic difficulty because it underlies the openness of symbols to various worlds in the same way ‘Hermes’ is characteristic of volatility and vagueness in Illuminationist Gnosticist Culture. It is vagueness that allows a compromise between contradictions. A symbol is a prominent feature in the mystical language of the Muslims and is always given priority in the dichotomies developed by the ’ahl al-ḏawq (people of taste) as in: sign vs. expression, that which is hidden vs. that which is apparent, al-Fuhūm, i.e. innate knowledge or taste vs. al-Rusūm, i.e. acquired knowledge or exoteric, outer learning, and the truth vs. the Sharia.

Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price.

References

Abu Zaid, Ahmed
1985 “Al-Ramz wa al-’Usṭūra wa al-Binā' al-Iğtimā‘ī.” ʿĀlam al-Fikr Journal 16 (3).Google Scholar
Abu Zaid, Nasr Hamed
1983 Falsafat al-Ta’wīl: Dirāsa fi Ta’wīl al-Quran ʿind Ibn Arabi. Beirut, Lebanon: Dār al-Wahda.Google Scholar
Adūnis
2006 Al- Ṣufiyya wa al-Suryāliyya. Beirut, Lebanon: Dār al-Sāqī.Google Scholar
Afifi, Abu al-ʿUlā
1969 “Ibn ʿArabi fī Dirāsātī.” In the Proceedings of the Conference on Ibn Arabi on the Occasion of his Eighth Centenary of his Birth . Dār al-Kitāb al-ʿArabī.
Al-Buruswi, Ismail Hakki
1330 AH Tafsīr Rūḥ al-Bayān. Dār Saʿāda.Google Scholar
Al-Ghazali
n.d. Rawdat al-Ṭālibīn Edited by Mohammed Bakhit Beirut, Lebanon Dār al-Nahḍa
Al-Hakim, Suad
1981 Al-Muʿğam al-Ṣufī. Beirut: Dandara.Google Scholar
Al-Jilāni, Abdul Qadir
1997 Sirr al-’Asrār. Edited by Khalid Mohammed Adnanal-Zarʿi and Mohammed Ghassan Nasuh ʿAzkul. Damascus: Dār Al-Ansārī and Dār Al-Sanābel.Google Scholar
Al-Jili, Abdul Karim
1997 Al-’insān al-Kāmil fī Maʿrifat al-’Awā’il wal-’Awāḫir. Edited by Salah bin Muhammad bin ʿAwidah. Dār al-Kutub al-Ilmiyya.Google Scholar
2004 Al-'Isfār ʿan Risālat al-'Anwār fīmā Yatağallā li-'Ahl al-Ḏikr min al-'Asrār. Edited by ʿAsim Ibrahim al-Kiali and al-Husayni al-Shaḏili al-Darqawi. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya.Google Scholar
Ġuniyat ’Arbāb al-Samāʿ fi Kašf al-Qināʿ ʿan Wuğūh al-'Istimāʿ. A manuscript at the Royal Library in Rabat, No: 1747/3.
Šarḥ Muškilāt al-Futūḥāt al-Makiyya. A manuscript in digital format available on the link: ​/libback​.uqu​.edu​.sa​/ipac20.
Al-Jurjani, al-Sharīf
2004 Al-Taʿrifāt. Edited by Muhammad Sadiq al-Minshawi. Cairo: Dār al-Faḍīla.Google Scholar
Al-Masʿudi
1841 Meadows of Gold and Mines of Gems, an English translation of the Muruj al-dhahab by Aloys Sprenger. London: Harrisson and Co. Printers.Google Scholar
Al-Nabulsi, Abdulghani
2000 Ḫamrat Al-ḥān wa Rannat al-’Alḥān fī Šarḥ Risālat al-Shaykh ’Arsalān. Edited by Abdul Warith Muhammad Ali. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya.Google Scholar
2013 Al-Maʿārif al- Ġaybiyya fi Šarḥ al-‘Ayniyya al-Ğīliyya. Edited by Assem Ibrahim Kayali.Google Scholar
Al-Nabulsi, Abdulghani, and Hasan al-Būrīni
2003 Šarḥ Diwān Ibn al-Fāriḍ. Edited by Abdelkarim al-Namri. Lebanon: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya.Google Scholar
Al-Qashāni
2005 Kašf al-Wuğūh al-Ġurr li-Maʿanī . Edited by Ahmad Farid al-Mazīdi. Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya.Google Scholar
Al-Qushayri
1969 'Arbaʿu Rasa'il fi al-Taṣawwuf. Edited by Qasim al-Samarrā'i. Iraqi Academy of Sciences Press.Google Scholar
1989 Al-Risāla al-Qušayriyya. Edited by Abdel Halim Mahmoud Ben Mahmoudal-Sharif. Mu'assassat al-Šaʿb.Google Scholar
Al-Shaʿrani, Abdul Wahab
1988 Al-'Anwar al-Qudsiyya fī Maʿrifat Qawāʿid al-Ṣufiyya. Edited by Abd al-Baqi Surūr and Muhammad ʿīd al-Shāfiʿī. Beirut: Maktabat al-Maʿārif.Google Scholar
1999 Kašf al-Ḥiğāb wa al-Rān ʿan Wağh 'As'ilati al-Ğān. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿilmiyyā.Google Scholar
Al-Shaybi, Kamil Mustafa
(ed.) 1993 Šarḥ Diwān Al-Ḥallāğ. Tripoli-Lebanon: Manshurat al-Jamal.Google Scholar
Al-Sullami, Abu Abd al-Rahman
Ḥaqā'iqu al-Tafsīr. Available on the link: http://​www​.altafsir​.com.
Al-Tawḥidi, Abu Hayyān
1982 Al-'Išārāt al-'Ilāhiyya. Edited by Widād al-Qādi. Beirut: Dār al-Qādi and Dār al-Ṯaqāfa .Google Scholar
Altizer, Thomas J. J. et al.
(eds.) 1962 Truth, Myth, and Symbol. Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Al-Tūsi, al-Sarrāj
1960 Al-Lummaʿ fī al-Taṣawwuf. Introduced and edited by Abdel Halim Mahmoud and Tah Abdel Baqi Surūr. Egypt: Dār al-Kutub al-Ḥadīṯa.Google Scholar
Al-Tustari
2004 Tafsīr al-Qur'ān al-ʿAẓīm. Edited by Tah Abdalrra'uf Saʿd and Saʿd Hasan Muhammad Ali. Dār al-Ḥaram.Google Scholar
Amili, Sayyid Haydr
1975 Al-Muqaddimāt min Kitāb Naṣṣ al-Fuṣus fī Šarḥ Fuṣūs al-Ḥikam. Edited by Henri Kurban and Uthman Yahya with an introduction. Tahran.Google Scholar
Aragon, Louis
1970 Traité du Style. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Avicenna
c.1014–20 Kitāb al-Nağāt (The Book of Salvation). Translated by F. Rahman as Avicenna’s Psychology: An English Translation of Kitab al-Najat, Book II, Chapter VI with Historical-philosophical Notes and Textual Improvements on the Cairo Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press 1952.Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland
1992 Al- Ḫayāl al-Ramzī. Translated by Isa Ali al-Akub. Beirut: Arab Development Institute.Google Scholar
Borini, Hassan, and Abdulghani al-Nabulsi
2003 Šarḥ Diwān Ibn al-Fāriḍ. Edited by Mohammed Abdul Karim al-Nimri. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya.Google Scholar
Corbin, Henry
2006 Al-Ḫayāl al-Ḫallāq fī Taṣawwuf Ibn Arabi. Translated by Farid al-Zahi. Morocco: Manšūrāt Marsam.Google Scholar
Decharneux, Baudouin, and Luc Nefontaine
2014 Le symbole. PUF.Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto
1972 La Structure Absente: Introduction à la Recherche Sémiotique. Paris: Mercure de France.Google Scholar
1996 Al-Qāri’ fī al-Hikāya. Translated by Antoine Abu Zeid. Casablanca: The Arab Cultural Center.Google Scholar
2009 Al-Ta’wīl wa al-Ta’wīl al-Mufriṭ. Translated by Nasser Al-Halawani. Markaz al-’Inmā’ al-ʿArabi.Google Scholar
Eliade, Mircea,Joseph M. Kitagawa
and (ed.) 1959 The History of Religions: Essays in Methodology. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Elyaboudi, Khaled
2013 “’Asāmi al-ʿUlūm bayna al-'Irṯiyya wa al-Kasbiyya.” Muṣṭalaḥiyyāt 4–5: 207–276.Google Scholar
2014 Al-Tadāḫul al-Muṣṭalaḥī fī al- Ḫitāb al-Ṣufī. Fez: Oumayma Press.Google Scholar
Ḥallāğ
2002 Complete Works. Edited by Qāssim Mohammed Abbās. Riad al-Rais books.Google Scholar
Helmi, Mohammed Mustafa
1969 Kunūz fī Rumūz. In the Research Memorial Book: Muhyiddin Ibn Arabi. Dār al-Kitāb al-ʿArabī.Google Scholar
Ibn ʿAğība, Ahmad
1913 ’Īqāẓ al-Himam fī ٹarḥ al-Ḥikam. Egypt: al-Matbaʿa al-Ğamāliyya.Google Scholar
n.d. Miʿrāğ al-Tašawwuf 'ilā Ḥaqā'iqi al-Taṣawwuf, followed by Kašf al-Niqāb ʿan Sir Lubbi al-'Albāb . Introduced and edited by ʿabd al-Majid Khiali. Casablanca: al-Turaṯ al-Ṯaqāfī.
Ibn al-Fāriḍ
n.d. Diwān Ibn al-Fāriḍ. Beirut: Dār Sādir.
Ibn Arabi, Muhyi al-Din
1968 Ḏaẖā’ir al-’Aʿlāq Šarḥ Tarğumān al-’Ašwāq. Edited by Mohammed Abdul Rahman Al Kurdi. Paris: Dār Bebleon.Google Scholar
Ibn Arabi
1853 Al-Futūḥāt al-Makkiya. Egypt.Google Scholar
1966 Turjumān al-Ašwāq. Beirut: Dar Sadir.Google Scholar
1985 Šağaratu al-Kawn. Edited by Riad al-Abdullah. Beirut: Dār al-Ilm.Google Scholar
1992 Al-Futūḥāt al-Makkiya. Edited by Yahya Othman. Al-Hay’a al-Maṣriya al-ʿĀmma lil-Kitāb.Google Scholar
1998 Rasā’il Ibn Arabi. Edited by Qassim Mohammed Abbas and Hussein Mohammed Ajil. Abu Dabi, UAE: Publications of the Cultural Foundation.Google Scholar
2002 Rasā’il Ibn Arabi, al-Quṭb wa al-Naqbā’ wa ʿUqlat al-Mustawfiz. Introduced and edited by Saeed Abdel Fattah. Beirut: Mu’assasat al-Intišār al-ʿArabi.Google Scholar
2002 Rasā’il Ibn Arabi. Edited by Samir Khaled Rajab. Dār ’Iḥyā’ al-Turāt al-ʿArabī.Google Scholar
Ibn Khaldun
1996 Šifā’ al-Sā’il li-Tahḏīb al-Masā’il. Edited by Muhammad Hafiz. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr al-Muʿāṣir.Google Scholar
Ibn Sabʿīn
2002 Rasā'il ibn Sabʿīn. Edited by the Egyptian General Organization for authoring, News and publishing. Cairo.Google Scholar
Iḫwān
Rasā'ilu of Iḫwān al-Ṣafā ( Epistles/Treatises by Brothers of Purity). Bombay edition in four volumes.
Laude, Patrick
2010 Pathways to an Inner Islam. Massignon, Corbin, Guenon, and Schuon: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, Bernard
(trans.) 2011 Music of a Distant Drum: Classical Arabic, Persian, Turkish & Hebrew Poems. N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Maḏkūr, Ibrāhīm
(ed.) 1969 Muḥyī al-Dīn Ibn ʿArabī fī al-Ḏikrā al-Miʾawīyya al-Ṯāmina li-Mīlādihi (1165–1240). Egypt: Dār al-Kitāb al-ʿArabī.Google Scholar
Mahmoud, Zaki Naguib
1969 “Tarīq al-Ramz ʿind Ibn Arabi.” In Al-Kitāb al-Tiḏkāri (The memorial book: Muhyiddin Ibn Arabi, the eighth anniversary of his birth). Cairo: Dār al-Kitāb al-ʿArabī.Google Scholar
Massignon, Louis
1922 Essai sur les Origines du Lexique Technique de la Mystique Musulmane. Paris: Paul Guethner.Google Scholar
1983 Muḥādarāt fī Tārīẖ al-’Iṣṭilāḥāt al-Falsafiyya al-ʿArabiyya. Edited by Zaynab al-Khudairi. Al-Maʿhad al-ʿIlmī al-Faransī.Google Scholar
Nasr, Jawda ʿĀti
1978 Al-Ramz al-Šiʿrī ʿind al-Ṣūfī. Beirut: Dār al-’Andalus and Dār al-Kindī.Google Scholar
Ramli, Yusri Mohamad
2013 “Martyrdom of al-Hallaj and Unity of the Existence: the Condemners and the Commenders.” International Journal of Islamic Thought 3: 106–112.Google Scholar
Rastier, François
1987 Sémantique Interprétative: Formes Sémiotiques. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Renard, John
2009 The A to Z of Sufism. Plymouth-UK: The Scarecrow Press.Google Scholar
Ricœur, Paul
1959 « Le Symbole Donne à Penser. » Esprit 27 (7–8).Google Scholar
1986 Du texte à l’Action: Essais d’Herméneutique II. Paris: Seuil. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005 Ṣirāʿ al-Ta’wīlāt. Translated by Munḏir ʿAyāchi and George Zinati. Dār al-Kitāb al-Ğadīda.Google Scholar
Stendhal
1842 De L’Amour (On Love). Paris: Mongie. Translated from the French with an introduction and notes by Philip Sidney Woolf and Cecil N. Sidney Woolf. New York: Brentano’s 1915.Google Scholar
Zayʿūr, Ali
1979 Al-Tafsīr al- Ṣūfī al-ʿIrfānī li al-Quran. Dār al-’Andalus.Google Scholar
Zarrūq, Ahmed
1976 Qawāʿid at-taṣṣawwuf. Egypt: Matbaʿat al-Kuliyyat al-Azhariyya.Google Scholar