Minimal and non-minimal answers to yes-no questions
Abstract
Against the theoretical and methodological background of conversation analysis (CA), the author addresses the issue of the contextual conditions for a specific type of grammatical phenomenon: answers to yes-no questions. She distinguishes five kinds of answers: two minimal ones, one next to minimal one, and two sentential types of answers. Minimal and non-minimal types of answers are shown to be doing different kinds of work in an interaction, full sentence answers addressing a wider range of features oriented to in the context either by the questioner or in the interpretation. The different types are placed along a confirmation-negation continuum.
Keywords:
Quick links
Hakulinen, Auli
(2000) On some uses of the discourse particle kyl(lä) in Finnish conversations. In E. Couper-Kuhlen & M. Selting (eds.), Interactional linguistics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 
Laitinen, Lea
(1995) Nollapersoona [The zero person]. Virittäjä 99.3: 337-358.
Raevaara, Liisa
(1993) Kysyminen toimintana. [Questioning as an activity]. Unpublished licentiate thesis, Department of Finnish, University of Helsinki.
Raymond, Geoffrey
(2000) Type-conforming and non-conforming responses to yes/no questions. Ph. Dissertation, Department of Sociology, UCLA.
Sacks, Harvey
(1992) Lecture 2, Fall 1968; Lecture 2, Spring 1972. In G. Jefferson (ed.), Lectures on conversation, Vol II. Oxford & Cambridge: Blackwell, pp. 410-415, 533-541.
Sadock, Jerry, and Arnold Zwicky
(1985) Speech act distinctions in syntax. In T. Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, Vol I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 155-196.
Sorjonen, Marja-Leena
forthcoming) Simple answers to polar questions: The case of Finnish. In E. Couper-Kuhlen & M. Selting (eds Interactional linguistics Amsterdam/Philadelphia John Benjamins Publishing Company