A contrastive study of conventional indirectness in Spanish: Evidence from Peninsular and Uruguayan Spanish

Rosina Márquez Reiter

Abstract

This article examines the results of a contrastive empirical study of conventional indirect requests in Peninsular and Uruguayan Spanish. The results reveal pragmatic similarities at the level of the linguistic encoding of utterances with both, Peninsular and Uruguayan Spanish speakers showing a negative correlation between (in)directness and social distance. The less familiar the interlocutors are with each other, the more likely it is for their requests to be realised indirectly. On the other hand, pragmatic differences were found in the tentativeness conveyed by the requests in these two language varieties. Uruguayan Spanish requests were more tentative than those in Peninsular Spanish. This tentativeness was achieved through a more frequent and more varied use of external modifications and a much higher incidence of internal modificating devices of the downgrading type.

Keywords:
Quick links
A browser-friendly version of this article is not yet available. View PDF
Blum-Kulka, S., J. House, and G. Kasper
(1989) Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Norwood: N.J. Ablex.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Bravo, Diana
(1998) ¿Reírse juntos?: Un estudio de las imágenes sociales de hablantes españoles, mexicanos y suecos. Diálogos Hispánicos 22: 315-364.Google Scholar
Brown, P., and S. Levinson
(1978) Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In E.N. Goody (1978a) (ed.), Questions and politeness: Strategies in social interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 56-310.Google Scholar
(1987) Politeness: Some Universals in Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Curcó, Carmen
(1998) ¿No me harías un favorcito?: Reflexiones en torno a la expresión de la cortesía verbal en el español de México y el español peninsular. Diálogos Hispánicos 22: 129-171.Google Scholar
Davison, A
(1975) Indirect speech acts and what to do with them. In Cole and Morgan, Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech acts. New York: Academic Press, pp. 143-185.Google Scholar
Fant, Lars
(1996) Regulación conversacional en la negociación: Una comparación entre pautas mexicanas y peninsulares. In T. Kotschi, W. Oesterreicher, and K. Zimmermann (eds.), Biblioteca Ibero-Americana. El español hablado y la cultura oral en España e Hispanoamérica. Vervuert: Iberoamericana, pp. 147-183.Google Scholar
García, Carmen
(1989) Disagreeing and requesting by Americans and Venezuelans. Linguistics and Education 1: 299-322. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1991) Making a request and responding to it: A case study of Peruvian Spanish speakers. Journal of Pragmatics 19: 127-152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haverkate, Henk
(1994) La cortesía verbal. Estudio pragmalinguístico. Madrid: Editorial Gredos.Google Scholar
Hassall, Tim
(1999) Request strategies in Indonesian. Pragmatics 9.4: 585-606.  BoP DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hernández, Nieves
(1999) Politeness ideology in Spanish colloquial conversations: The case of advice. Pragmatics 9.1: 37-49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hofstede, Geert
(1983) National Cultures Revisited. Behavior Science Research 18.4: 285-305. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
House, Juliane, and Gabriele Kasper
(1987) Interlanguage pragmatics: Requesting in a foreign language. In Wolfgang Lörscher, and Rainer Schulze (eds.), Perspectives in language performance. Tübingen: Narr, pp. 1250-1288.Google Scholar
Koike, Dale
(1989) Requests and the role of deixis in politeness. Journal of Pragmatics 13: 187-202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1994) Negation in Spanish and English suggestions and requests: Mitigating effects? Journal of Pragmatics 21: 513-526. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Krüger, Elke
(1996) Los actos comunicativos de ‘aceptación’ y formas de su realización en español. In Thomas Kotschi, Wulf Oesterreicher, and Klaus Zimmermann (eds.), El español hablado y la cultura oral en España e Hispanoamérica. Madrid: Iberoamericana, pp. 207-221.Google Scholar
Márquez Reiter, Rosina
(1997) Sensitising Spanish learners of English to cultural differences: The case of politeness. In Pütz, M. (ed.), The Cultural Context in Foreign Language Teaching. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, pp. 143-155.Google Scholar
(2000) Linguistic Politeness in Britain and Uruguay. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Márquez Reiter, Rosina, I. Rainey, and G. Fulcher
in press) A comparative study of conventional indirectness and certainty in British English and Peninsular Spanish. DOI logo
Mir, Montserrat
(1992) Do we all apologize the same?- An empirical study on the act of apologizing by Spanish speakers learning English. In L. Bouton, and Y. Kachru (eds.), Pragmatics and Language Learning. Vol 3, 1-19. Urbana IL, Division of English as an International Language, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
Placencia, Ma. Elena
(1994) Pragmatics across varieties of Spanish. Donaire 2: 65-77.Google Scholar
(1998) Pragmatic variation: Ecuadorian Spanish vs. Peninsular Spanish. Spanish Applied Linguistics 2.1: 71-106.Google Scholar
Martín Zorraquino, Ma. Antonia, and José Portolés Lázaro
(1999) Los marcadores del discurso. In I. Bosque, and V. Demonte (eds.), Gramática Descriptiva de la Lengua Española. Espa_a: Madrid.Google Scholar
Price, L
(1987) Ecuadorian illness stories. In D. Holland, & N. Quinn (eds.), Culture Models in Language and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 313-342. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Puga Larraín, Juana
(1997) La atenuación en el castellano de Chile: Un enfoque pragmalingüístico. Estudios Iberoamericanos. Tirant Lo Blanch Libros: Universitat de Valencia.Google Scholar
Searle, John
(1975) Indirect speech acts. In P. Cole, and J. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press, pp. 59-82.Google Scholar
Vázquez-Orta, Ignacio
(1995) A contrastive study of politeness phenomena in England and Spain. Applied & Interdisciplinary Papers, Paper No. 267. Duisburg: L.A.U.D.Google Scholar
Walters, J
(1979) The perception of politeness in English and Spanish. In C. Yorio, K. Peters, and J. Schachter (eds.), On TESOL ’79. Washington DC: TESOL, pp. 288-296.Google Scholar