Actors and discourses in the construction of hegemony

Monica Heller

Abstract

In this paper, I will examine one aspect of a Gramscian notion of hegemony, one which focusses on the way in which hegemony is about “collectively attaining a single cultural “climate””, at least in part through language. This assumes discursive struggle in which some views end up marginalizing others. I will examine this struggle in terms of some of the ways in which the trajectories of actors and of discourses are connected, such that discursive resources are (or are not) available to actors with different positions with respect to unequally distributed symbolic and material resources, and are used in practice in ways which make sense given the sets of interests these actors have. This attempt at operationalizing an ethnography of hegemony is based on an analysis of discursive shift in between ethnonational forms of hegemonic discourse and practice being challenged by commodification, economic networking, and multiple affiliations, under conditions of economic shift from primary and secondary resource economies to tertiary ones, and of the re- shaping of the State’s relationship to civil society and the private sector. It has specifically to do with current shifts in ideas about what constitutes the category francophone in Canada, or put differently, what it might mean to do being “francophone”. In particular, I will examine the ways in which the institutionalized structures related to that categorization have been called into question by ongoing political economic change, and how actors involved in those structures act in, on and through the process of change to produce new ways of doing la francophonie, at least on the local level.

Keywords:
Quick links
A browser-friendly version of this article is not yet available. View PDF
Appadurai, Arjun
(1996) Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Bagaoui, Rachid, and Simon Laflamme
(1997) Les organismes franco-ontariens face à la crise de l’État- providence: Continuité et rupture. Revue du Nouvel-Ontario 21: 73-89.Google Scholar
Cicourel, Aaron
(2002) Le raisonnement médical: Une approche socio-cognitive. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre
(1982) Ce que parler veut dire. Paris: Fayard.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Castells, Manuel
(2000) The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cyr, Roger
(1964) La Patente: Tous les secrets de la “maçonnerie” canadienne-française. L’Ordre de Jacques Cartier. Montréal: Éditions du Jour.Google Scholar
Farmer, Diane
(1996) Les artisans de la modernité. Ottawa: Presses de l’Université d’Ottawa.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony
(1984) The Constitution of Society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gramsci, Antonio
(1971) Q. Hoare and G. Smith (trans. and eds.), Selections from the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
Heller, Monica
(1999) Linguistic Minorities and Modernity: A Sociolinguistic Ethnography. London: Longman.  BoPGoogle Scholar
in press) La Patente: Embryon de la modernisation. In M. Heller N. Labrie& (eds.) Prise de parole: Langue, pouvoir et identité dans un monde en mutation Montréal HMH Hurtubise
Heller, Monica, and Gabriele Budach
(1999) Prise de parole: La mondialisation et la transformation des discours identitaires chez une minorité linguistique. Bulletin suisse de linguistique appliquée 69.2: 155-166.Google Scholar
Heller, Monica, and Normand Labrie
(eds.) in press Prise de parole: Langue, pouvoir et identité dans un monde en mutation Montréal HMH Hurtubise
Hobsbawm, Eric, and Terence Ranger
(1983) The Invention of Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Laliberté, G.-Raymond
(1983) Une société secrète: l’Ordre de Jacques Cartier. Montréal: HMH Hurtubise.Google Scholar
Martel, Marcel
(1997) Le deuil d’un pays imaginé. Ottawa: Presses de l’Université d’Ottawa.Google Scholar
Philips, Susan
(1998) Language ideologies in institutions of power: A commentary. In: B. Schieffelin, K. Woolard and P. Kroskrity (eds.), Language Ideologies: Practice and Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 211-225.Google Scholar
Sylvestre, Paul-François
(1980) Penetang: L’École de la résistance. Sudbury: Prise de parole.Google Scholar