Discourse in a religious mode: The Bush administration’s discourse in the war on terrorism and its challenges

Gordon C. Chang and Hugh B. Mehan

Abstract

This study of the politics of representation illustrates the Bush Administration’s use of a religious mode of representation to make sense of the 9/11 events, to legitimize military actions against the Taliban, Afghanistan, and terrorism in general. The religious mode of representation is enabled by the construction and application of what we call the “War on Terrorism script,” which is grounded in the institution of “American civil religion.” We demonstrate the unique power of this mode of representation to create a coherent account at a time of national crisis, to establish connections between the 9/11 perpetrators, the Taliban, and the Afghanistan government. By comparing the Bush Administration’s discourse with those voiced by dissenters and critics using intellectual, rational, and legal representations and modes of argumentation in the post-9/11 contexts, we demonstrate how the institutionalization of a particular mode of speaking influence a particular mode of thinking and a particular mode of acting. We also argue that the convention governing political discourse have significant implications in determining the legitimacy of definitions and interpretations of political situations as well as of political actions.

Keywords:
Quick links
A browser-friendly version of this article is not yet available. View PDF
AbuKhalil, As‘ad
(2002) Bin Laden, Islam, and America’s new “War on Terrorism.” New York: Seven Stories Press.Google Scholar
Ackerman, Seth
(2001) Network of insiders: TV news relied mainly on officials to discuss policy. EXTRA! November/December 2001, Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR). http://​www​.fair​.org​/extra​/0111​/network​-study​.html (accessed 2 August 2004).
Bellah, Robert N
([1966] 1968) Civil religion in America. In William G. McLoughlin and Robert N. Bellah (eds.), Religion in America. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company, pp. 3-23.Google Scholar
(1980a) Introduction. In Robert N. Bellah and Philip E. Hammond (eds.), Varieties of Civil Religion. San Francisco, CA: Harper and Row, pp. vii-xv.Google Scholar
(1980b) Religion and the legitimation of the American republic. In Robert N. Bellah and Philip E. Hammond (eds.), Varieties of Civil Religion. San Francisco, CA: Harper and Row, pp. 3-23.Google Scholar
Burke, Kenneth
(1989) On Symbols and Society. Edited by Joseph R. Gusfield. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Calhoun, Craig, Paul Price, and Ashley Timmer
(eds.) (2002) Understanding September 11. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
Chilton, Paul
(ed.) (1985) Language and the nuclear arms debate: Nukespeak today. London and Dover, New Hampshire: Frances Printer.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Chilton, Paul A
(2004) Analysing political discourse: Theory and practice. London and New York: Routledge.  MetBib. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chilton, Paul, and Christina Schäffner
(1997) Discourse and politics. In Teun A. van Dijk (ed.), Discourse as social interaction: Discourse studies: A multidisciplinary introduction volume 2. London, Thousand Oaks, and New Delhi: Sage Publications, pp. 206-230.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
(2002) Understanding power: The indispensable Chomsky. Edited by Peter R. Mitchell and John Scholeffel. New York: New Press.Google Scholar
Chouliaraki, Lilie
(2004) Watching September 11: The politics of pity. Discourse and Society 15.2-3: 185-198. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coles, Roberta L
(2002a) Manifest destiny adapted for 1990s’ war discourse: Mission and destiny intertwined. Sociology of Religion 63.4: 403-426. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2002b) War and the contest over national identity. The Sociological Review 50.40: 586-609. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Craige, Betty Jean
(1996) American patriotism in a global society. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Dolny, Michael
(2002) Think tanks in a time of crisis: FAIR’s 2001 survey of the media’s institutional experts. EXTRA! March/April 2002, Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR). http://​www​.fair​.org​/extra​/0203​/think​_tanks​.html (accessed 2 August 2004).
Dixon, Wheeler Winston
(ed.) (2004) Film and television after 9/11. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Drew, Paul, and John Heritage
(1992) Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings. New York: Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Durkheim, Emile
([1912] 1995) The elementary forms of religious life. Translated by Karen E. Fields. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Edwards, John
(2004) After the fall. Discourse and Society 15.2-3: 155-184. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman
(1995) Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. London, UK: Longman.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Foucault, Michel
(1972) The archeology of knowledge and the discourse on language. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold
(1967) Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Glaser, Barney G., and Anselm L. Strauss
(1967) The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine Pub. Co.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles
(1994) Professional vision. American Anthropologist 96.3: 606-633. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, John J
(1982) Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Holquist, Michael
(1983) The politics of representation. The Quarterly Newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition 5.1: 2-9.Google Scholar
Juergensmeyer, Mark
(2002) Religious terror and global war. In Craig Calhoun, Paul Price, and Ashley Timmer (eds.), Understanding September 11. New York: The New Press, pp. 27-40.Google Scholar
Keane, Webb
(1997) Religious language. Annual Review of Anthropology 26: 47-71. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kellner, Douglas
(2003) From 9/11 to Terror War: The dangers of the Bush legacy. Lanhan, Maryland and Oxford, UK: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George
(2004) Don’t think of an elephant: Know your values and frame the debate. White River Junction, VT: Chealsea Green Publishing.Google Scholar
Leudar, Ivan, Victoria Marsland, and Jiri Nekvapil
(2004) On membership categorization: ‘Us’, ‘them’ and ‘doing violence’ in political discourse. Discourse and Society 15.2-3: 243-266. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lincoln, Bruce
(2002) Holy terrors: Thinking about religion after September 11. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maynard, Douglas W., and Steven E. Clayman
(1991) The diversity of ethnomethodology. Annual Review of Sociology 17: 385-418. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mehan, Hugh
(1979) Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1997) The discourse of the illegal immigration debate: A case study in the politics of representation. Discourse and Society 8.2: 249-270. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
([1993] 2000) Beneath the skin and between the ears: A case study in the politics of representation. In Bradley A.U. Levinson, Kathyrn M. Borman, Margaret Eisenhart, Michele Foster, Amy E. Fox, and Margaret Sutton (eds.), Schooling the Symbolic Animal: Social and Cultural Dimensions of Education. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 259-279.Google Scholar
Mehan, Hugh, Charles E. Nathanson, and James M. Skelly
(1990) Nuclear discourse in the 1980s: The unraveling conventions of the Cold War. Discourse and Society 1.2: 133-165. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Mehan, Hugh, and James Skelly
(1988) Reykjavik: The breach and repair of the pure war script. Multilingua 7.1/2: 35-66. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Mehan, Hugh, and John Willis
(1988) MEND: A nurturing voice in the nuclear arms debate. Social Problems 35.4: 363-383. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mehan, Hugh B., and Sarah A. Roberts
(2001) Thinking the nation: Representations of nations and the Pacific Rim in Latin American and Asian textbooks. Narrative Inquiry 11.1: 195-217. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nathanson, Charles E
(1988) The social construction of the Soviet threat. Alternatives 13: 443-83. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Perrow, Charles
(1999) Normal accidents: Living with high-risk technologies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pierard, Richard V., and Robert D. Linder
(1988) Civil religion and the presidency. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Zondervan Publishing House.Google Scholar
Pollner, Melvin
(1987) Mundane reason: Reality in everyday and sociological discourse. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Robinson, W.S
(1951) The logical structure of analytic induction. American Sociological Review 16: 812-818. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schank, Roger C., and Robert P. Abelson
(1977) Scripts, plans, goals and understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge structures. Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Schudson, Michael
(1989) How culture works: Perspectives from media studies on the efficacy of symbols. Theory and Society 18: 153-180. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schutz, Alfred
(1962) Collected papers, vol. I: The problem of social reality. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Michael
(1988) The politics of representation. Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
U.S. House
(2001)  Authorizing use of United States armed forces against those responsible for recent attacks against the United States . H.J.Res. 64. 107th Congress, 1st Session (14 September 2001). Congressional Record 147(120): H5638-H5681.Google Scholar
Van Belle, William, and Paul Claes
(1985) The logic of deterrence: A semiotic and psychoanalytic approach. In Paul Chilton (ed.), Language and the nuclear arms debate: Nukespeak today. London, UK and Dover, New Hampshire: Frances Printer, pp. 91-102.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun A
(1980) Macrostructures: An interdisciplinary study of global structures in discourse, interaction, and cognition. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Vaughan, Diane
(1996) The Challenger launch decision: Risky technology, culture and deviance at NASA. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Virilio, Paul, and Sylvere Lotringer
([1983] 1997) Pure war: Revised edition. Translated by Mark Polizzotti. New York: Semiotext(e).Google Scholar
Weick, Karl E
(1995) Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar