Exercising politeness: Membership categorisation in a radio phone-in programme

Milan Ferenčík

Abstract

The paper seeks to demonstrate that, first, over the course of interaction in the radio phone-in events, participants display orientation to various aspects of their co-participants´ identities, second, since membership categories emerge and are developed at various sequentially relevant times, membership categorisation processes are closely tied with the event´s sequential organisation, and, third, categorisation bears on politeness aspects of interaction as the participation in the public ´arena´ causes participants´ faces to be constantly at stake. The methodological underpinnings of the paper represent the approaches of Membership Categorisation Analysis and the model of politeness based on the conceptualisation of face. The data are drawn from the corpus of Nočné dialógy (´Night Dialogues´) radio phone-ins broadcast on the Slovak public radio over the period of 1995-2004. The paper further attempts to demonstrate that participants are engaged in category work which sequentially unfolds in the course of the production of phone-in calls. Participants´ progressive involvement in talk is closely linked with the construction of ´layers´ of their categorial identities. The membership category of ´location´ represents the minimum agreed-upon canon of callers´ call-relevant identities. As the category is universally applicable, it bears the least face-threatening potential, for which reason it is used explicitely. In contrast, strategies of non-explicit categorisation, i.e. invoking categories through category-relevant predicates, apply to those topic-relevant categories which carry a significant face-threating ´load´ (e.g. ´family status´, ´political affiliation´, etc.). In summary, sequential organisation and category work are seen as being closely intertwined, with the latter also being employed as a positive and negative politeness strategy.

Keywords:
Quick links
A browser-friendly version of this article is not yet available. View PDF
Bourdieu, Pierre
(1991) Language and symbolic power. Cambridge: Polity Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson
(1987) Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Drew, Paul
(1994) Conversation Analysis. In R.E. Asher (ed), The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Oxford: Pergamon Press, pp.749-754.Google Scholar
Eelen, Gino
(2001) A critique of politeness theories. Manchester, UK: St.Jerome Publishing.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Ferenčík, Milan
(2004) Social categorization and politeness in the media discourse. In Sučasni doslidženia z inozemnoj filologii 2, Užgorod: Užgorodskij nacionaľnyj universitet, pp. 94-104.Google Scholar
(1995) Štruktúra rozhlasového dialógu. Slovenská reč 60.5-6: 281-288.Google Scholar
(2002) Organizácia a priebeh úvodných fáz rozhlasovej kontaktnej relácie Nočné dialógy. Slovo a slovesnost 63: 200-212.Google Scholar
(2005a) Repair and identity construction in talk-in-interaction. In English Is a Key. Ružomberok 2005, pp. 40-52.Google Scholar
(2005b) Identita a zdvorilosť – k problému sociálnej kategorizácie v mediálnom dialógu. In J. Rusnák a M. Bočák (eds), Médiá a text. FF PU, Prešov, pp.63-86.Google Scholar
(2005c) Organization of repair in talk-in-interaction and politeness. Theory and practice in English studies 3 (2005). Eighth Conference of British, American and Canadian Studies. Brno: Masarykova univerzita, pp. 69-78.
(2006a) Non-impolite interruptions: Politeness aspects of recognitional interruptions on talk radio. Discourse Studies: Trends and perspectives. Nitra: FF UKF, pp. 47-58.Google Scholar
(2006b) Členská kategorizácia v politickom diskurze a zdvorilosť. (Membership categorization in political discourse and politeness) (in press).
Fitzgerald, Richard
(msa) Talkback, community and the public sphere. Crossref
(msb) Two axes of communication in talkback radio: Some techniques for building community and delivering politics agendas through public access media.
Fitzgerald, Richard, and William Housley
(2002) Identity, categorization and sequential organization: The sequential and categorial flow of identity in a radio phone-in. Discourse & Society 13.5: 579-602. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Francis, David, and Stephen Hester
(2004) An invitation to ethnomethodology: Language, society and interaction. London: Sage. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John
(1989) Current developments in conversation analysis. In Roger, D. and P. Bull (eds.), Conversation: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. Clevedon-Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters LTD, pp. 21-47.Google Scholar
He, Agnes W
(2004) Identity construction in Chinese heritage language classes. Pragmatics 4.2/3: 199-216.  BoP CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hester Stephen, and Richard Fitzgerald
(1999) Category, predicate and task: Some organizational features in a radio talk show. In P. Jalbert (ed.), Media Studies: Ethnomethodological Approaches. SECA, No. 5. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Hutchby, Ian
(1991) The organization of talk on talk radio. In P. Scannell (ed.), Broadcast Talk. London: Sage.Google Scholar
(1992a) Confrontation talk: Aspects of ´interruption´ in argument sequences on talk radio. Text 12.3: 343-371.  BoP CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1992b) The pursuit of controversy: Routine scepticism in talk on “talk radio”. Sociology 26.4: 673-694. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1995) Aspects of recipient design in expert advice giving on call-in radio. Discourse Processes 19: 217-238. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1996a) Power in discourse: The case of arguments on a British talk radio show. Discourse & Society Vol. 7.4: 481-497. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1996b) Confrontation Talk. Arguments, Assymetries, and Power on Talk Radio. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.Google Scholar
(1999) Frame attunement and footing in the organisation of talk radio show. Journal of Sociolinguistics 3.1: 41-63. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
(2001) ´Witnessing´: The use of first-hand knowledge in legitimating lay opinions on talk radio. Discourse Studies. Vol 3.4: 481-497. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hutchby, Ian, and Paul Drew
(1995) Conversation Analysis. In J.-O. Ostman, J. Verschueren, & L. Blommaert (eds.), Handbook of pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp.282-289. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hutchby, Ian, and Robin Wooffitt
(2002) Conversation Analysis. Principles, Practices and Applications. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine
(1997) A multilevel approach in the study of talk-in-interaction. Pragmatics 7.1: 1-20.  BoP CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey
(1983) Principles of pragmatics. London & New York:  BoPGoogle Scholar
Longman.Leudar, Ivan, Victoria Marsland, and Jiří Nekvapil
(2004) On membership categorization: ´us´, ´them´ and ´doing violence´ in political discourse. Discourse & Society Vol 15.2-3: 243-266. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Liddicoat, Anthony, Annie Brown, Susanne Döpke, and Kristina Love
(1992) The effect of the institution: Openings in talkback radio. Text 12.4: 541-562.  BoP CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Liddicoat, Anthony, Susanne Döpke, Kristina Love, and Annie Brown
(1994) Presenting a point of view: Callers´ contributions to talkback radio in Australia. Journal of Pragmatics 22: 139-156. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Nekvapil, Jiří
(2000/2001) Sociální kategorizace v interkulturním kontaktu: Základní výklad, cvičení a diskuse dvou scén z podnikové komunikace. Češtinář 11: 38-52, 72-84.Google Scholar
Panese, M
(1996) Calling in: Prosody and conversation in radio-talk. Pragmatics 6: 1.19-87.  BoP CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shields-Brodber, Kathryn
(1992) Dynamism and assertiveness in the public voice: Turn-taking and code-switching in radio talk shows in Jamaica. Pragmatics 2.4: 487-504. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thornborrow, Joanna
(2001a) Questions, control and the organization of talks in calls to a radio phone-in. Discourse Studies Vol 3.1: 119-143. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
(2001b) Authenticating talk: Building public identities in audience participation boadcasting. Discourse Studies Vol 3.4: 459-479. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Watson, Rod D
(1997) ´Some general reflections on „categorization“ and „sequence“ in the analysis of conversation´. In S. Hester and P. Eglin (eds.), Culture in Action. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Watts, Richard
(2003) Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar