Interjections in literary readings and artistic performance

Daniel C. O’Connell, Sabine Kowal and Scott P. King

Abstract

Numerosity and privileges of occurrence of various types of interjections (primary conventional, primary non-conventional, secondary, and onomatopoeic) were investigated in three different literary readings of Winnie-the-Pooh (Milne 1926), in one reading of Ulysses (Joyce 1960), and in an artistic performance by actors (the film The third man, Korda, Selznik, & Reed 1949). The spoken corpora, based on printed texts as source, consisted of 667 interjections. Ameka’s (1992 b, 1994) hypothesis that, parallel to their independence from ambient grammar, interjections would also be isolated temporally by preceding and following pauses, was not confirmed; for the entire corpus, only 39% of all interjections were thus isolated. However, an alternative hypothesis, that interjections serve an initializing function, was confirmed: Altogether, 77% of the interjections were found to be initializing, i.e., were preceded by a pause, introduced a speaking turn, introduced an utterance, and/or introduced a citation. Primary conventional interjections constituted the majority of interjections (overall 56%), but only two of these were common to all the corpora (oh and ah). By far the highest percentage (28 %) of primary non- conventional interjections occurred in the artistic performance of The third man. None of these occurred in either the novel or the screenplay of The third man, unlike the primary non-conventional interjections throughout the text of the literary readings. Functions of interjections are discussed in terms of Goffman’s (1981: 226) animators (literary readers, 26% of whose spoken interjections were added to those in the printed text) and principals (actors, 79% of whose spoken interjections were added to those in the printed text), in terms of literacy and orality, and in terms of the emotional stance and perspective of a speaker at the very moment of utterance.

Keywords:
Quick links
A browser-friendly version of this article is not yet available. View PDF
Aijmer, K
(1987)  Oh and ah in English conversation. In W. Meijs (ed.), Corpus linguistics and beyond: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora, Vol. 59. Amsterdam: Costerus, pp. 61-86.Google Scholar
Ameka, F
(ed.) (1992a) Interjections. Journal of Pragmatics Special Issue 18: ix-301. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1992b) Interjections: The universal yet neglected part of speech. Journal of Pragmatics 18: 101-108. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1994) Interjections. In R.E. Asher (ed.), The encyclopedia of language and linguistics Vol. 2. Oxford: Pergamon Press, pp. 1712-1715.Google Scholar
Angermeyer, A
(1979) Die Interjektion. Linguistik und Didaktik 10: 39-50.Google Scholar
Bennett, A., R. Briers, and F. Kendal
(speakers) (1988) Winnie-the-Pooh (cassette recording). New York: Bantam Doubleday Dell Audio Publishing.Google Scholar
Burger, H
(1980) Interjektionen. In H. Sitta (ed.), Ansätze zu einer pragmatischen Sprachgeschichte: Zürcher Kolloquium 1978. Tübingen: Niemeyer, pp. 53-69. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Burkhardt, A
(1998) Interjektionen: Begriff, Geschichte(n), Paraphrasen. In T. Harden and E. Hentschel (eds.), Particulae particularum. Festschrift für Harald Weydt. Tübingen: Niemeyer, pp. 43-73.Google Scholar
Clark, H.H., and J.E. Fox Tree
(2002) Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking. Cognition 84: 73-111. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eastman, C.M
(1992) Swahili interjections: Blurring language-use/gesture use boundaries. Journal of Pragmatics 18: 273-287. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ehlich, K
(1986) Interjektionen. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Fries, N
(1988) Interjektionen und Interjektionsphrasen. Sprache und Pragmatik 17: 1-43.Google Scholar
(1990) Zur Grammatik von Interjektionen. In E. Feldbusch, R. Pogarell, and C. Weiß (eds.), Neue Fragen der Linguistik. Akten des 25. Linguistischen Kolloquiums, Paderborn 1990. Band 1: Bestand und Entwicklung. Tübingen: Niemeyer, pp. 283-295.Google Scholar
(1992) Interjektionen, Interjektionsphrasen und Satzmodus. In I. Rosengren (ed.), Satz und Illokution 1. Tübingen: Niemeyer, pp. 307-341. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, E
(1981) Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Greene, G
(1950) The third man [novel]. Hammondsworth, Middlesex, England: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
(1984) The third man (rev. ed.) [screenplay]. London: Lorrimer.Google Scholar
Hansen, M.-B.M
(1998) The function of discourse particles. A study with special reference to spoken standard French. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harris, R
(1980) The language-makers. London: Duckworth.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Holt, E
(1996) Reporting on talk: The use of direct reported speech in conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction 29: 219-245. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Jacquet, L
. (director) (2005) March of the penguins. Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.Google Scholar
Jespersen, O
(1922) Language: Its nature, development, and origin. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Joyce, J
(1960) Ulysses. London: The Bodley Head.Google Scholar
Jucker, A.H., and S.W. Smith
(1998) And people you know like ‘wow’: Discourse markers as negotiating strategies. In A.H. Jucker and Y. Ziv (eds.), Discourse markersDiscourse markers: Descriptions and theory. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 171-201. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Karcevski, S
(1941) Introduction à l’étude de l’interjection. Cahiers F. de Saussure 1: 57-75.Google Scholar
Kleeman, F
(1980) Der Gebrauch der Interjektionen bei Wilhelm Busch. Sprachpflege 20: 8-11.Google Scholar
Koch, P, and W. Oesterreicher
(1994) Schriftlichkeit und Sprache. In H. Günther and O. Ludwig (eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit. Writing and its use. Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung. An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Berlin: de Gruyter, pp. 587-604.Google Scholar
Korda, A., D.O. Selznik (C. Reed
producers), and (director) (1949) The third man [motion picture]. (Available from Home Vision Cinema, 4411 Ravenswood Avenue, Chicago, IL 60640-5802)Google Scholar
Kowal, S., and D.C. O’Connell
(2004) Interjektionen im Gespräch. Zeitschrift für Semiotik 26: 85-99.Google Scholar
Kuralt, C
. (speaker) (1998) The Winnie-the-Pooh read-aloud collection vol. 1. [cassette recording]. New York: Dutton Children’s Books.Google Scholar
Langenscheidts Enzyklopädisches Wörterbuch der englischen und deutschen Sprache: “Der Grosse Muret-Sanders.” 11thed. 2 vols
(1996) Berlin: Langenscheidt.Google Scholar
Merriam-Webster’s collegiate dictionary
. 11thed (2003) Springfield, MA: Merriam-Webster.
Milne, A.A
(1926) Winnie-the-Pooh. New York: Dutton Children’s Books.Google Scholar
Milne, A.A., S. Fry, J. Dench, J. Horrocks, G. Palmer, and M. Williams
(1998) Pooh goes visiting: And other stories [cassette recording]. England: Hodder Headline Audiobooks.Google Scholar
Müller, C., and R. Posner
(eds.) (2004) The semantics and pragmatics of everyday gestures. Berlin: Weidler.Google Scholar
Norton, J., and M. Riordan
(speakers) (1994) Ulysses. Germany: Naxos AudioBooks.Google Scholar
Nübling, D
(2004) Die prototypische Interjektion: Ein Definitionsvorschlag. Zeitschrift für Semiotik 26: 11-45.Google Scholar
O’Connell, D.C., and S. Kowal
(2004) The history of research on the filled pause as evidence of The written language bias in linguistics (Linell 1982). Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 33: 459-474. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
O’Connell, D.C., S. Kowal
and (2005a) Uh and Um revisited: Are they interjections for signaling delay? Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 34: 555-576. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
and (2005b) Where do interjections come from? A psycholinguistic analysis of Shaw’s Pygmalion. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 34: 497-514. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
O’Connell, D.C., and S. Kowal
(2006) Laughter in The third man . Pragmatics 16: 2/3.Google Scholar
O’Connell, D.C., S. Kowal, and C. Ageneau
(2005) Interjections in interviews. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 34: 153-171. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
O’Connell, D.C., S. Kowal, and E.J. Dill III
(2004) Dialogicality in TV news interviews. Journal of Pragmatics 36: 185-205. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary
(1954) Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pascal, G. (A. Asquith, and L. Howard
Producer), (Directors) (1938) Pygmalion [Motion picture]. (Available as VHS or DVD from http://​www​.amazon​.com)
Pompino-Marschall, B
(2004) Zwischen Tierlaut und sprachlicher Artikulation: Zur Phonetik der Interjektion. Zeitschrift für Semiotik 26: 71-84.Google Scholar
Reisigl, M
(1999) Sekundäre Interjektionen: Eine diskursanalytische Annäherung. Frankfurt/Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Rhodes, R.A
(1992) Interjections. In W. Bright (ed.), International encyclopedia of linguistics Vol. 1. New York: Oxford University Press, p. 222.Google Scholar
Schneider, W
(1959) Stilistische deutsche Grammatik. Basel: Herder.Google Scholar
Shaw, G.B
(1916/1969) Pygmalion: A romance in five acts and my fair lady: A musical play in two acts. New York: Signet.Google Scholar
Svartvik, J., and R. Quirk
(1980) (eds.) A corpus of English conversation. Lund: Gleerup.Google Scholar
Tesnière, L
(1936) Sur la classification des interjections. In A. Sestak & A. Dokoupil (eds.), Mélanges dédiés à la mémoire de Prokop M. Haškovec par ses amis et élèves. Brno: Globus, pp. 343-410.Google Scholar
Wilkins, D.P
(1992) Interjections as deictics. Journal of Pragmatics 17: 119-158. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Wundt, W
(1900) Völkerpsychologie. Erstes Buch: Die Sprache. Leipzig: Engelmann.Google Scholar
Yang, E
(2004) Interjektionen im Sprachvergleich: Deutsch versus Chinesisch. Zeitschrift für Semiotik 26: 47-69.Google Scholar