Dichotomy in the structures of honorifics of Japanese

Misato Tokunaga
Quick links
A browser-friendly version of this article is not yet available. View PDF
Araki, H
(1983) Nihongo kara Nihonjin o kangaeru (A study of the Japanese people from the viewpoint of their language). Tokyo: Asahi-Shinbun-Sha.Google Scholar
(1983) Keigo Nihonjin Ron (Honorifics: the Japanese). Kyoto: PHP Kenkyuu-jo.Google Scholar
Doi, T
(1973) The anatomy of dependence. Tokyo: Kodansha International, Ltd.Google Scholar
Ikegami, Y
(1981) “Sunt” to “Nam” no Gengo-gaku: Gengo to Bunka no Taipologii e no shiron. (Linguistics of “Do” and “Become”: A tentative typological analysis of language and culture). Tokyo: Taishuukan.Google Scholar
(1982) “Hyoogen Koozoo no Hikaku: Suruteki na gengo to Naruteki na gengo” (A comparison in the mechanism of expression: Do-language and Become-language). In Kunihiro (ed.) Nichi-Ei-Go Hikaku Kooza Vol.4: Hassoo to Hyoogen (Comparative studies of Japanese and English Vol.4: Conception and expression). Tokyo: Taishuukan, pp.67-109.Google Scholar
Kuno, S
(1978) Danwa no Bumpoo (Grammar of discourse). Tokyo: Taishuukan.Google Scholar
(1987) Functional syntax: Anaphora, discourse and emphathy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Matsumoto, Y
Reexamination of the universality of face: Politeness phenomena in Japanese”. Journal of Pragmatics 12: 403-426. North-Holland. DOI logo
Tbkunaga, M
(1985) “A strategy for objective expressions in Japanese”. In Journal of Asian Culture Vol.9: 181-198. Graduate Studies in Asian Studies at UCLA.Google Scholar
(1986) “Affective debris in Japanese: A case study of directional verbs”. Ph.D. dissertation. The University of Michigan.
(1988) “A paradox in Japanese pragmatics”. Papers in Pragmatics 2(1/2): 84-105. Antwerp: International Pragmatics Association.Google Scholar
(1988) “Integrating pragmatics into the language instruction: A rule for choice of appropriate expressions in Japanese”, (unpublished paper). Presented at the Conference on Innovations in Teaching Chinese and Japanese at Rutgers University, March.
(1989) “A paradoxical functions of passives in Japanese pragmatics”. Tb appear in Papers of the LACUS Forum. Linguistics Associations of Canada and the United States.Google Scholar
(1990) “Structural dichotomy and pragmatics in Japanese”. Paper presented at the Conference on Japanese Linguistics and Language. Middlebury College.
(1991a) “Integrating pragmatics and pedagogy: A case of the Japanese passives and causatives”. Gengo Kyooku Kenkyu Vol.2: 105-114. Institute of Linguistics and Language. Kanda University of International Studies.Google Scholar
(1991b) “Semantics of the passive and causative suffixes in Japanese”. Pan-Asiatic linguistics: Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Language and Linguistics Vol.1: 324-338. Chulalongkorn University.Google Scholar