“Today there is no respect”: Nostalgia, “respect” and oppositional discourse in mexicano (nahuatl) language ideology

Jane H. Hill

Quick links
A browser-friendly version of this article is not yet available. View PDF
Briggs, C
(1989) Competence in Performance. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Eagleton, T
(1991) Ideology. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Friedrich, P
(1989) “Language, ideology, and political economy.” American Anthropologist 91:295-312. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giddens, A
(1976) New Rules of Sociological Method. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Hill, J.H
(1990a) “The cultural (?) context of narrative involvement.” In Bradley Music, Randolph Graczyk, and Caroline Wiltshire, (eds.), Papers from the 25th Annual Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Part Two: Parasession on Language in Context, pp. 138-156. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
(1990b) “In neca gobierno de Puebla: Mexicano penetrations of the Mexican state.” In Joel Sherzer and Greg Urban (eds.), Indian and State in Latin America, pp. 72-94. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
lb appear) “The voices of Don Gabriel.” In Bruce Mannheim and Dennis Tedlock (eds.) The Dialogic Emergence of Culture Philadelphia University of Pennsylvania Press
Hill, J.H. and K.C. Hill
(1978) “Mexicano honorifics.” Language 54:123-55. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1986) Speaking Mexicano. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Hill, K.C
(1985) “Las penurias de dona María: Un anâlisis sociolingüístico de un relato del náhuatl moderno.” Tlalocan 10:33-115.Google Scholar
KartUinen, F. and J. Lockhart
(1976) Nahuatl in the Middle Years: Language Contact Phenomena in Texts of the Colonial Period. University of California Publications in Linguistics 85.
Karttunen, F. and J. Lockhart
(1987) The Art of Nahuatl Speech: The Bancroft Dialogues. Nahuatl Studies Series Number 2. Los Angeles, CA: UCLA Latin American Studies Center Publications.Google Scholar
Leon-Portilla, M
(1982) “Three forms of thought in ancient Mexico.” In F. Allan Hanson (ed.), Studies in Symbolism and Cultural Communication, pp. 9-24. University of Kansas Publications in Anthropology 14. Lawrence, KN: University of Kansas.Google Scholar
Nutini, H. and T. Murphy
(1970) “Labor migration and family structure in the Tlaxcala-Puebla area, Mexico.” In W. Goldschmidt and H. Hoijer (eds.), The Social Anthropology of Latin America: Essays in Honor of Ralph Leon Beals, pp. 80-103. Los Angeles, CA: UCLA Latin American Center. Google Scholar
Rumsey, A
(1990) “Wording, meaning, and linguistic ideology.” American Anthropologist 92:346-361. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Silverman, D. and B. Torode
(1980) The Material Word. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Silverstein, M
(1979) “Language structure and linguistic ideology.” In Paul R. Clyne, William F. Hanks, and Carol L. Hofbauer (eds.), The Elements: A Parasession on Linguistic Units and Levels, pp. 193-247. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
(1981) “The limits of awareness.” Working Papers in Sociolinguistics 84. Austin: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.Google Scholar
(1985) “Language and the culture of gender.” In Elizabeth Mertz and Richard Parmentier (eds.), Semiotic Mediation, pp. 219-259. New York: Academic Press. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Sweetser, E
(1987) “The definition of ‘lie’.” In Dorothy Holland and Naomi Quinn (eds.), Cultural Models in Language and Thought, pp. 43-66. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar