Getting negatives in Arizona Tewa: On the relevance of ethnopragmatics and language ideologies to understanding a case of grammaticalization

Paul V. Kroskrity

Abstract

This article explores the process of grammaticalization that has lead to the innovation of a distinct form of negation in Arizona Tewa, a Kiowa-Tanoan language spoken in the U. S. southwest. After reviewing comparative linguistic evidence that clearly establishes the innovative form of the Arizona Tewa negative, the analysis proceeds to examine ethnographic data as a means of understanding an apparent reanalysis of a subordinate clause marker as an obligatory part of negative constructions. Such data provide strong evidence for viewing the powerful role of discourse and language ideological factors in accounting for how this grammatical reanalysis both emerged and ultimately came to be the “preferred” form. Comparative data from Australian languages provides additional evidence for viewing larger discourses as highly influential contexts for grammatical change.

Keywords:
Quick links
A browser-friendly version of this article is not yet available. View PDF
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson
(1987) Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins, and William Pagliuca
(1994) The Evolution of Grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas, and Adam Jaworski
(2004) Sociolinguistic perspectives on metalanguage: Reflexivity, evaluation, and ideology. In A. Jaworski, N. Coupland, & D. Galasinski (eds.), Metalanguage: Social and Ideological Perspectives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 15-51. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R.M.W
(1972) The Dyirbal Language of North Queensland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Douglass, W.H
(1964) An Introduction to the Western Dessert Language. Oceania Linguistic Monographs, no. 4. Sydney: University of Sydney.Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas
(2007) Insubordination and its uses. In Irina Nikolaeva (ed.), Finiteness: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 366-431.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy
(1979) On Understanding Grammar. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hopi Dictionary Project
(1998) Hopi Dictionary/Hopiikwa Lavaytutuveni: A Hopi English Dictionary of the Third Mesa Dialect with an English Finder List and a Sketch of Hopi Grammar. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J., and Elizabeth Closs Traugott
(1993) Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Kroskrity, Paul V
(1993) Language, History, and Identity: Ethnolinguistic Studies of the Arizona Tewa. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1998) Arizona Tewa Kiva speech as a manifestation of a dominant language ideology. In B. Schieffelin, K. Woolard, & P. Kroskrity (eds.), Language Ideologies, Practice and Theory. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 103-22.  BoPGoogle Scholar
(2005) Tewa and the Kiowa Tanoan languages. In Philipp Strazny (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Linguistics, Volume 2. New York: Fitzroy-Dearborn, pp. 1091-4.Google Scholar
Labov, William
(1963) The social motivation of a sound change. Word 19: 273-309.  BoP CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1972) Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Leap, William
(1975) On negation (and what you can do with it). Paper presented at the Annual Friends of Uto-Aztecan Conference. Flagstaff, Arizona.
Lehmann, Christian
(1995) Thoughts on Grammaticalization. Munich: Lincom Europa.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Lopez-Couso, Maria Jose, and Elena Seoane
(2008) New perspectives on grammaticalization. In Maria Jose Lopez-Couso and Elena Seoane (eds.), Rethinking Grammaticalization: New Perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 1-13. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Meillet, Antoine
(1912) L’évolution des formes grammaticales. Scientia (Rivista di Scienza) 12.26: 6.Google Scholar
Ramat, Anna Giacalone, and Paul Hopper
(eds.) (1998) The Limits of Grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Seoane, Elena, and Maria Jose Lopez-Couso
(eds.) (2008) Theoretical and Empircal Issues in Grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, Michael
(1985) Language and the culture of gender: At the intersection of structure, usage, and ideology. In Elizabeth Mertz and Richard J. Parmentier (eds.), Semiotic Mediation. Orlando, FL.: Academic Press, pp. 219-259. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Speirs, Randall H
(1966) Some aspects of the structure of Rio Grande Tewa. Ph.D. dissertation, State University of New York, Buffalo.
Trager, George L
(1946) An outline of Taos grammar. In H. Hoijer (ed.), Linguistic Structures of Native North America. New York: Viking Fund, pp. 184-221.Google Scholar
Watkins, Laurel J
(1984) A Grammar of Kiowa. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Yegerlehner, John F
(1957) Phonology and morphology of Hopi-Tewa. Ph.D. dissertation, Indiana University.
Zaharlick, Anne Marie
(1977) Picuris syntax. Ph.D. dissertation, American University.