Interactional and categorial analyses of identity construction in the talk of female-to-male (FtM) transgender individuals in Japan

Chie Fukuda
Independent researcher

Abstract

This study explores the identity construction of female-to-male (FtM) transgender individuals, utilizing membership categorization analysis and multimodal conversation analysis. ‘Identity’ in this study indicates a person’s display of category membership or ascription to category membership, which emerges in social actions. The study illustrates how participants make categories and associated features visible in their social actions through the use of multimodal resources. In particular, the study focuses on the participants’ orientation to Pn-adequate devices, particularly gender as a binary. The analysis shows that the participants’ orientation to gender ideologies, such as gender’s Pn-adequacy, plays a significant role in how they construct their FtM transgender identities.

Keywords:
Publication history
Table of contents

This study explores identity construction of female-to-male (FtM) transgender individuals, utilizing membership categorization analysis and multimodal conversation analysis. In this study, ‘identity’ is a person’s “display of, or ascription to, membership of some feature-rich category,” made sequentially relevant to interactional business/social actions, and visible in the use of resources such as the structures of conversation (Antaki and Widdicombe 1998, 2–3). Following this definition, the study illustrates how participants use categories, their features, and multimodal resources (e.g. interactional features, gestures) to accomplish social actions through which identities emerge.

Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price. Direct PDF access to this article can be purchased through our e-platform.

References

Antaki, Charles, and Sue Widdicombe
1998Identities in Talk. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Burch, Alfred Rue, and Gabriele Kasper
2016 “Like Godzilla: Enactments and Formulations in Telling a Disaster Story in Japanese.” In Emotion in Multilingual Interaction, ed. by Matt Prior, and Gabriele Kasper, 59–85. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Butler, Judith
1993Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of Sex. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cromwell, Jason
1999Transman and FtMs: Identities, Bodies, Gender, and Sexualities. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Galbraith, Patrick W., and Jason G. Karlin
2012 “Introduction: The Mirror of Idols and Celebrity.” In Idols and Celebrity in Japanese Media Culture, ed. by Patrick W. Galbraith, and Jason G. Karlin, 1–32. Hampshire, UK: Palgrave MacMillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Getsuyoo kara yofukashi
[Monday late show] 2017, November 6. Directed by Naohiko Maeda. Written by Shinichi Sakurai. Nippon Television Network Corporation.Google Scholar
heinz, matthew
2016Entering Transmasculinity: The Inevitability of Discourse. Bristol, UK: intellect. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John
1984 “A Change-of-State Token and Aspects of Its Sequential Placement.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by Maxwell J. Atkinson, and John Heritage, 299–345. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hines, Sally
2007TransForming Gender: Transgender Practices of Identity, Intimacy and Care. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Ishida, Vandy
2017, July 9. “ Kokoro wa otoko karada wa onna geenin Manjiroo-san [His heart is male, his body is female, a comedian Manjiroo].” YouTube video, 10:06. https://​www​.youtube​.com​/watch​?v​=xHoemSN4cT8
Jackson, Clare
2012 “The Gendered ‘I.’” In Conversation and Gender, ed. by Elizabeth Stokoe, and Susan A. Speer, 31–47. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, Austin H.
2016 “Transnormativity: A New Concept and Its Validation through Documentary Film about Transgender Men.” Sociological Inquiry 86 (4): 465–491. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Katsiveli, Stamatina
2021 “ ‘It Is This Ignorance We Have to Fight’: Emergent Gender Normativities in an Interview with Greek Transgender Activists.” Gender and Language 15 (2): 158–183. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kitchannel
2017, June 1. “ Bucchake kiitemitai shitsumon besuto 5 [Five questions we frankly want to ask].” YouTube video, 3:57. https://​www​.youtube​.com​/watch​?v​=YjNz7Mt4aXU
Lerner, Gene H., and Celia Kitzinger
2007 “Introduction: Person-Reference in Conversation Analytic Research.” Discourse Studies 9 (4): 427–432. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C.
1983Pragmatics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
lgbtq+ primary hub
n.d. “Heteronormativity and Cisnormativity.” Accessed on October 22, 2021. https://​www​.lgbtqprimaryhub​.com​/heteronormativity​-cisnormativity
Lunsing, Wim
2005 “The Politics of Okama and Onabe: Uses and Abuses of Terminology Regarding Homosexuality and Transgender.” In Genders, Transgenders, and Sexualities in Japan, ed. by Mark McLelland, and Romit Dasgupta, 81–95. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Maree, Claire
2013Oneekotoba ron [Queer language]. Tokyo: Seedosha.Google Scholar
Mondada, Lorenzo
2018 “Multiple Temporalities of Language and Body in Interaction: Challenges for Transcribing Multimodality.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 51 (1): 85–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita
1986 “Extreme Case Formulations: A Way of Legitimizing Claims.” Human Studies 9: 219–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
RationalWiki
n.d. “Transgender Glossary.” Accessed on October 22, 2021. https://​rationalwiki​.org​/wiki​/Transgender​_glossary
Raymond, Chase W.
2019 “Category Accounts: Identity and Normativity in Sequences of Action.” Language in Society 48: 585–606. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roever, Carsten, and Gabriel Kasper
2018 “Speaking in Turns and Sequences: Interactional Competence as a Target Construct in Testing Speaking.” Language Testing 35 (3): 331–355. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey
1972 “An Initial Investigation of the Usability of Conversational Data for Doing Sociology.” In Studies in Social Interaction, ed. by David Sudnow, 31–74. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
1992Lectures on Conversation. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Schutz, Alfred
1970On Phenomenology and Social Relations. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Speer, Susan A.
2009 “Passing as a Transsexual Woman in the Gender Identity Clinic.” In Theorizing Identities and Social Action, ed. by Margaret Wetherell, 116–138. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stanley, Eric A.
2014 “Gender Self-Determination.” Transgender Studies Quarterly 1 (1–2): 89–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stivers, Tanya
2008 “Stance, Alignment, and Affiliation during Storytelling: When Nodding Is a Token of Affiliation.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 41 (1): 31–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stokoe, Elizabeth
2003 “Mothers, Single Women and Sluts: Gender, Morality and Membership Categorization in Neighbour Disputes.” Feminism & Psychology 13 (3): 317–344. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stokoe, Elizabeth, and Frederick Attenborough
2014 “Gender and Categorial Systematics.” In Handbook of Language, Gender and Sexuality, ed. by Susan Ehrlich, Miriam Meyerhoff, and Janet Holmes, 161–179. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ward, Katie
2020 “Understanding Gender Categorisation in a Binary Society.” In Gender Equality in Changing Times: Multidisciplinary Reflections on Struggles and Progress, ed. by Angela Smith, 107–128. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watson, Rod
1978 “Categorization, Authorization and Blame-Negotiation in Conversation.” Sociology 12 (1): 105–113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yoshimoto Koogyoo Channel
2009, May 12. “ Yukichi no jikoshookai [Self-introduction of Yukichi].” YouTube video, 1:19. https://​www​.youtube​.com​/watch​?v​=lB​-WzK6ys6Y
Zimman, Lal
2019 “Trans Self-Identification and the Language of Neoliberal Selfhood: Agency, Power, and the Limits of Monologic Discourse.” International Journal of the Sociology of Language 256: 147–175. DOI logoGoogle Scholar