Discoursal representation of masculine parenting in Arabic and English websites

Mohammed Nahar Al-Ali and Hanan A. Shatat
Jordan University of Science and Technology

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the differences and similarities between Arabic and English parents’ role in Arabic and English parenting website texts and the linguistic exponents used to address parents and signal their roles, and to find out the socio-cultural ideologies that have given rise to variations in gender roles. To this end, a corpus of 40 articles targeting gender-neutral titles and father related ones were selected equally from English and Arabic websites. Drawing on Van Leeuwen’s (2008) framework on critical discourse analysis (CDA) and Sunderland’s (2000, 2006) framework of analysis, the data were analysed and contrasted. The English texts reflected the prevalence of ‘shared parenting’ discourse, whereas the Arabic ones revealed a ‘very traditional parenthood’ discourse. These differences can be attributed to variation in the socio-cultural practices dominant in Arab and Western societies. Such findings will hopefully provide some useful insights for family life educators and parents who resort to such websites.

Keywords:
Publication history
Table of contents

Parenthood research has become of interest to professionals (e.g., midwives, doctors, and psychologists) to assess fathers and mothers, especially those married couples expecting a baby, or having a new baby. Thus, we analyze website texts as a source of parenting information addressed to heterosexual parents. Such texts would be a fruitful source on addressing and representing gender’s different roles, relations, and practices. As a general note, this article will not explore parenthood texts targeting gay parents or the single mother or single father.

Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price. Direct PDF access to this article can be purchased through our e-platform.

References

Abu-Baker, Khawla
2005 “The Impact of Social Values on the Psychology of Gender among Arab Couples: A View from Psychotherapy”. Israel Journal of Psychiatry and Related Studies 42 (2): 106–115.Google Scholar
Al-Ali, Mohammed
2006 “Religious Affiliations and Masculine Power in Jordanian Wedding Invitation Genre”. Discourse and Society 17 (6): 691–714. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Al-Ghazali, Mohammed
2005Al-Haq Al-Murr, Part 1, 7th edition. Cairo: Dar Nahdhat.Google Scholar
Al-Kaa’ki, Nahla
2000 “ khitaan al?inaah [Circumcision of Females]. Al-Sehah Al-Nafsiyah” 20: 17–18.Google Scholar
Althusser, Louis
1984Essays on Intertextuality. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Asad, Talal
2003Formations of the Secular: Christianity, Islam, Modernity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bentenuto, Arianna, and Paola Venuti
2019 “From Supporting to Co-Parenting: The New Roles of Fathers”. Parenting: Science and Practice 19: 30–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brandth, Berit, and Elin Kvande
1998 “Masculinity and Child Care: The Reconstruction of Fathering”. The Sociological Review 46 (2): 293–313. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brookfield, Stephen
2005The Power of Critical Theory: Liberating Adult Learning and Teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Cameron, Christina
2013A Critical Discovery Analysis of Gendered Language in Online Parenting Education. MA Thesis. Halifax, Nova Scotia.
Craig, Lyn
2006 “Parental Education, Time in Paid Work and Time with Children”. British Journal of Sociology 57: 553–75. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dienhart, Anna
1998Reshaping Fatherhood: The Social Construction of Shared Parenting. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dwairy, Marwan, and Inaya Sakleh
2006 “Parenting Styles in Arab Societies”. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology 37 (3): 1–18. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gatrell, Caroline
2006 “Interviewing Fathers: Feminist Dilemmas in Fieldwork”. Journal of Gender Studies 15 (3): 237–51. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael. A. K.
1994An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 2nd edition. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Ibn Al-Qayyim
2007Islam web. Fatwa no. 86406. https://​www​.islamweb​.net​/en/. Retrieved in October 2020.
Janks, Hilary
1997 “Critical Discourse Analysis as a Research Tool”. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural politics of Education 18 (3): 329–42.Google Scholar
Joseph, Suad
2000Gender and Citizenship in the Middle East. New York: Syracuse University.Google Scholar
Lazar, Michelle
2000 “Gender, Discourse, and Semiotics: The Politics of Parenthood Representations”. Discourse & Society 11 (3): 373–400. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mahmood, Saba
2012 “Sectarian Conflict and Family Law in Contemporary Egypt”. American Ethnologist 40 (1): 54–62. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marsiglio, William
1995 “Fathers’ Diverse Life Course Patterns and Roles: Theory and Social Interventions”. In Research on Men and Masculinities Series: Fatherhood: Contemporary Theory, Research, and Social Policy, edited by William Marsiglio, 78–101. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Messner, Michael
1993 “ ‘Changing Men’ and Feminist Politics in the United States”. Theory and Society 22(5): 723–737. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
National Council on Family Relations (NCFR)
www​.ncfr​.org. Retrieved in October 2020.
Paltridge, Brian
2006Discourse Analysis: An Introduction. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Qutb, Muhammad
2006Islam the Misunderstood Religion. English edition 2 . Riyadh: IIFSO.Google Scholar
Rashley, Lisa
2005 “ ‘Work It Out with your Wife’: Gendered Expectations and Parenting Rhetoric Online”. NWSA Journal 17 (1): 58–92. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Segal, Lynne
1990Slow Motion: Changing Masculinities, Changing Men. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Shaw, Susan
2008 “Family Leisure and Changing Ideologies of Parenthood”. Sociology Compass 2 (2): 688–703. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Silver, Cynthia
2000 “Being There: The Time Dual-Earner Couples Spend with their Children”. Canadian Social Trends 57: 26–29.Google Scholar
Short, Patricia
2005 “Conclusion: Reflections on Motherhood.” In Motherhood: Power and Oppression, edited by Andrea O’Reilly, Mary Porter, and Patricia Short, 285–94. Toronto: Women’s Press.Google Scholar
Spiteri, Lachlan and Isobella Fitzjerald
2016The Importance, Structure and Role of Family in Amish Culture. Lachlan Spiteri.Google Scholar
Stoppard, Miriam
2007The New Baby Care Book: A Practical Guide to the First Three Years.‏ Dorling Kindersley (DK) Publishing.Google Scholar
Such, Elizabeth
2006 “Leisure and Fatherhood in Dual-Earner Families”. Leisure Studies 25 (2): 185–99. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sunderland, Jane
2000 “Baby Entertainer, Bumbling Assistant and Line Manager: Discourses of Fatherhood in Parentcraft Texts”. Discourse & Society 11 (2): 249–274. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006 “ ‘Parenting’ or ‘Mothering’? The Case of Modern Childcare Magazines”. Discourse & Society 17 (4): 503–528. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun
2003 “Critical Discourse Analysis”. In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, edited by Deborah Schiffrin, Deborah Tannen, and Heidi Hamilton, 352–371. Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Van Leeuwen, Theo
1996 “The Representation of Social Actors”. In Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis, edited by Caldas Coulthard & Malcolm Coulthard, 32–70. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2008Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Warner, Judith
2005Perfect Madness: Motherhood in the Age of Anxiety. New York, NY: Riverhead Books.Google Scholar