Shifting perspective on indexicals

Mark Bowker

Abstract

The debate over the meanings of indexical expressions has relied heavily on the method of counterexamples. This paper challenges that method by showing that purported counterexamples can often be explained away by appeal to perspective shifts. For these counterexamples to establish anything about indexical reference, we must identify the conditions under which theorists can legitimately appeal to perspective shifts. Some tests for semantic content are considered and it is argued that none of them can tell us when appeal to perspective shift is admissible. The paper then considers how we should proceed if we become convinced that there is no way to identify the content of indexical expressions, offering reasons in favour of a nihilist conception of character over an epistemicist or pluralist conception.

Keywords:
Publication history
Table of contents

The debate over the referents of indexicals has relied heavily on the use of counterexamples. One theorist presents a rule for identifying the referent of an indexical in context, a second presents a counterexample in which that rule seems to take us to the wrong referent and presents an alternative rule, a third presents an counterexample to that rule, and so on. This paper will argue that reliance on counterexamples faces a significant problem. Counterexamples invite us to agree that some theory misidentifies the referent of an indexical as used in a particular context. Even when we are inclined to agree, however, we may well be mistaken.

Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price. Direct PDF access to this article can be purchased through our e-platform.

References

Åkerman, Jonas
2015 “The Communication Desideratum and Theories of Indexical Reference.” Mind & Language 30: 474–99. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017 “Indexicals and Reference-Shifting: Towards a Pragmatic Approach.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 95: 117–152. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bowker, Mark
2019 “Underdetermination, Domain Restriction, and Theory Choice.” Mind & Language 34 (2): 205–220. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2022 “Ineliminable Underdetermination and Context-Shifting Arguments.” Inquiry 65 (2): 215–236. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Jonathan
2013 “Indexicality and the Puzzle of the Answering Machine.” Journal of Philosophy 110: 5–32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Corazza, Eros, Willaim Fish, and Jonathan Gorvett
2002 “Who is I?Philosophical Studies 107: 1–21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dodd, Dylan, and Paula Sweeney
2010 “Indexicals and Utterance Production.” Philosophical Studies 150: 331–348. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Egan, Andy
2009 “Billboards, Bombs and Shotgun Weddings.” Synthese 166: 251–279. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Enoch, David
2007 “Epistemicism and Nihilism About Vagueness: What’s the Difference?Philosophical Studies 133: 285–311. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gómez-Torrente, M.
2020Roads to Reference: An Essay on Reference Fixing in Natural Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kaplan, David
1989a “Demonstratives: An Essay on the Semantics, Logic, Metaphysics, and Epistemology of Demonstrative and Other Indexicals.” In Themes from Kaplan, ed. by J. Almog, J. Perry, and H. Wettstein, 481–563. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
1989b “Afterthoughts.” In Themes from Kaplan, ed. by J. Almog, J. Perry, and H. Wettstein, 565–614. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kripke, Saul
1977 “Speaker’s Referent and Semantic Referent.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 2: 255–276. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Michaelson, Eliot
2014 “Shifty Characters.” Philosophical Studies 167: 519–540. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016 “The Lying Test.” Mind & Language 31: 470–499. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Michaelson, Eliot, and Jonathan Cohen
2013 “Indexicality and the Paradox of the Answering Machine.” Philosophy Compass 8: 580–592. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Montminy, Martin
2010 “Context and Communication: A Defense of Intentionalism.” Journal of Pragmatics 42: 2910–2918. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mount, Alison
2008 “The Impurity of “Pure” Indexicals.” Philosophical Studies 138: 193–209. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015 “Character, Impropriety, and Success: A Unified Account of Indexicals.” Mind & Language 20: 1–21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nunberg, Geoffrey
1993 “Indexicality and Deixis.” Linguistics and Philosophy 16: 1–43. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Perry, John
2003 “Predelli’s Threatening Note: Contexts, Utterances, and Tokens in the Philosophy of Language.” Journal of Pragmatics 35: 373–387. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006 “Using Indexicals.” In The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Language, ed. by M. Devitt, and R. Hanley, 314–34. Malden, MA: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Predelli, Stefano
1998a “ ‘I Am Not Here Now’.” Analysis 58: 107–115. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1998b “Utterance, Interpretation and the Logic of Indexicals.” Mind & Language 13: 400–414. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2002 “Intentions, Indexicals and Communication.” Analysis 62: 310–316. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 “I Am Still Not Here Now.” Erkenntnis 74: 289–303. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rabern, Brian and Derek Ball
2019 “Monsters and the Theoretical Role of Context.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 98 (2): 392–416. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Radelescu, Alexandru
2018 “The Difference Between Indexicals and Demonstratives.” Synthese 195: 3173–3196. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Recanati, François
2000Oratio Obliqua, Oratio Recta. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004Literal Meaning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Romdenh-Romluc, Komarine
2002 “Now the French are Invading England!Analysis 62: 34–41. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006 “ ‘I’.” Philosophical Studies 128: 257–283. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008 “First-person Thought and the Use of ‘I’.” Synthese 163: 145–156. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sherman, B.
2015 “Constructing Contexts.” Ergo 2 (23): 581–605.Google Scholar
Sidelle, Alan
1991 “The Answering Machine Paradox.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 21: 525–539. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Quentin
1989 “The Multiple Uses of Indexicals.” Synthese 78: 167–191. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, Graham
2009 “Utterance at a Distance.” Philosophical Studies 143: 213–221. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Voltolini, Alberto
2008 “Fiction as a Base of Interpretation Contexts.” Synthese 153: 23–47. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
von Fintel, Kai, and Anthony Gillies
2011 “ ‘Might’ Made Right.” In Epistemic Modality, ed. by A. Egan, and B. Weatherson, 108–130. Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weatherson, Brian
2002 “Misleading Indexicals.” Analysis 62: 308–310. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, Timothy
1994aVagueness. London, Routledge.Google Scholar
1994b “Definiteness and Knowability.” The Southern Journal of Philosophy 33: 171–191. CrossrefGoogle Scholar