Aspects of (‘and’) as a discourse marker in Persian

Reza Kazemian and Mohammad Amouzadeh

Abstract

This study investigates the functions of (‘and’) as a discourse marker in Persian. More specifically, this study accounts for certain aspects of co-occurrences and their linearization order. Fraser’s model (forthcoming) was mainly employed to classify the multiple functions conveyed by . A corpus-based approach was taken to provide an overview of co-occurrences with other discourse markers. The data were collected from both written and spoken corpora. Quantitative and qualitative analyses were conducted to examine the frequency and the functional differences in the use of in the data – namely, elaboration, inferential, contrast, and alternation. The results of the study indicate the mobile nature of in its co-occurrences with other DMs. The findings also show that some modifications to Fraser’s (forthcoming) DM co-occurrence principles are required to handle certain cases of language-specific behavior of in Persian. The configuration suggested for uses and its multi-functionality will also shed some lights on cross-linguistic studies of its counterparts in other languages.

Keywords:
Publication history
Table of contents

The importance of discourse markers (DMs) has attracted the attention of many scholars in linguistics with different perspectives (e.g., discourse connectivity and continuity, semantic change and grammaticalization, modal and pragmatic particles, etc.). This leads to diverse terms (see Dér 2010) and approaches for the investigation of DMs. Nonetheless, in most studies, they are mainly treated as communicative devices creating a connection between the preceding and following segments of discourse. The trend of investigation on DMs has not been confined within European major languages such as English (Aijmer 2002), German (Siebold 2021), Spanish (Pinto and Vigil 2020), French (Vanderbauwhede and Lamiroy 2020), but extended to other languages such as Arabic (Habib 2021) as well as Persian (Zoghdar-Moghdam and Dabirmoghdam 2002).

Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price. Direct PDF access to this article can be purchased through our e-platform.

References

Aijmer, Karin
2002English Discourse Particles: Evidence from a Corpus. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aijmer, Karin, and Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen
2011 “Pragmatic Markers.” In Discursive Pragmatics 8, ed. by Jan Zienkowski, Jan-Ola Östman, and Jef Verschueren, 223–247. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
2012 “The Essence of Mirativity.” Linguistic Typology 16 (3): 435–485. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Anvari, Hasan
2001Færhænge Soxæn. Tehran: Soxæn. [in Persian]Google Scholar
Bortfeld, Heather, Silvia D. Leon, Jonathan E. Bloom, Michael F. Schober, and Susan E. Brennan
2001 “Disfluency Rates in Conversation: Effects of Age, Relationship, Topic, Role, and Gender.” Language and Speech 44 (2): 123–147. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bublitz, Wolfram
2017 “Oral Features in Fiction.” In Pragmatics of Fiction, ed. by Miriam A. Locher, and Andreas H. Jucker, 235–263. De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crible, Ludivine
2017a “Discourse Markers and (Dis)fluency in English and French.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 22 (2): 242–269. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017b “Towards an Operational Category of Discourse Marker: A Definition and Its Model.” In Pragmatic Markers, Discourse Markers and Modal Particles, ed. by Chiara Fedriani, and Andrea Sansó, 99–124. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018Discourse Markers and (Dis)fluency. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crible, Ludivine, and Maria-Josep Cuenca
2017 “Discourse Markers in Speech Characteristics and Challenges for Corpus Annotation.” Dialogue and Discourse 8 (2): 149–166. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crible, Ludivine
2020 “Weak and Strong Discourse Markers in Speech, Chat, and Writing: Do Signals Compensate for Ambiguity in Explicit Relations?Discourse Processes 57 (9): 793–807. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crible, Ludivine, and Liesbeth Degand
2021 “Co-occurrence and Ordering of Discourse Markers in Sequences: A Multifactorial Study in Spoken French.” Journal of Pragmatics 177: 18–28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Klerk, Vivian
2005 “Procedural Meanings of ‘Well’ in a Corpus of Xhosa English.” Journal of Pragmatics 37 (8): 1183–1205. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dér, Csilla
2010 “On the Status of Discourse Markers.” Acta Linguistica Hungarica 57 (1): 3–28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Faghiri, Pegah, and Pollet Samvelian
2020 “Word Order Preferences and the Effect of Phrasal Length in SOV Languages: Evidence from Sentence Production in Persian.” Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 5 (1): 86. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, Bruce
1996 “Pragmatic Markers.” Pragmatics 6 (2): 167–190. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009 “An Account of Discourse Markers.” International Review of Pragmatics 1 (2): 293–320. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
forthcoming. “Canonical Sequences of Discourse Markers in English.”
Ghaderi, Soleiman
2019Baresi Mo’tarezeh Are/Na dar Zabane Farsi [The Thetical Aspects of Are/Na (Yes/No), in Persian]. PhD Thesis, University of Isfahan.
Ghaderi, Soleiman, and Mohammad Amouzadeh
2021 “Aspects of Are (Yes) in Persian Discourse: Its Functions, Positions, and Evolution.” Studia Linguistica 75 (3): 623–658. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
González, Montserrat
2005 “Pragmatic Markers and Discourse Coherence Relations in English and Catalan Oral Narrative.” Discourse Studies 7 (1): 53–86. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grice, Herbert P.
1975 “Logic and Conversation.” In Syntax and Semantics Vol. 3: Speech Acts, ed. by Peter Cole, and Jerry L. Morgan, 41–58. Brill.Google Scholar
Habib, Rania
2021 “The use of the Discourse Markers yaʕni and ʔinnu: ‘I mean’ in Syrian Arabic.” Journal of Pragmatics 178: 245–257. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael Alexander Kirkwood, and Ruqaiya Hasan
1976Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Haselow, Alexander
2019 “Discourse Marker Sequences: Insights into the Serial Order of Communicative Tasks in Real-time Turn Production.” Journal of Pragmatics 146: 1–18. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Gunther Kaltenböck, Tania Kuteva, and Haiping Long
2021The Rise of Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Horn, Paul
1893Grundriss der Neupersischen Etymologie. Strassburg: Karl J. Trübner. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kassaei, Gholamreza, and Mohammad Amouzadeh
2020 “The Combination of Discourse Markers in Persian.” International Review of Pragmatics 12 (1): 135–163. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kent, Roland G.
1953Old Persian: Grammar. Texts. Lexicon. New Haven: American Oriental Society.Google Scholar
Kuteva, Tania, Bernd Heine, Peter Austin, Seongha Rhee, Marine Vuilermet, and Domenico Niclot
2017 “The ‘Mirror’ of Insubordination.” Linguistics Departmental Seminar Series, SOAS University of London. Available at: https://​www​.youtube​.com​/watch​?v​=Jfq1KcoRens
Lambton, Ann KS.
1953Persian Grammar: Including Key. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lazard, Gilbert
1992A Grammar of Contemporary Persian. Cosa Mesa: Mazda Publishers.Google Scholar
Levy, Roger, and T. Florian Jaeger
2007 “Speakers Optimize Information Density through Syntactic Reduction.” In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), ed. by Bernhard Schölkopf, John Platt, and Thomas Hofmann, 849–856. MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lohmann, Arne, and Christian Koops
2016 “Aspects of Discourse Marker Sequencing – Emprical Challenges and Theoretical Implications.” In Outside the Clause: Forms and Functions of Extra-clausal Constituents, ed. by Gunther Kaltenbock, Evelien Keizer, and Arne Lohmann, 417–446. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mahootian, Shahrzad, and Lewis Gebhardt
1997Persian. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Norén, Kerstin, and Per Linell
2007 “Meaning Potentials and the Interaction between Lexis and Contexts: An Empirical Substantiation.” Pragmatics 17 (3): 387–416. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oates, Sarah Louise
2000 “Multiple Discourse Marker Occurrence: Creating Hierarchical for Natural Language.” In Procedding of the 3rd CLUK Colloquium, 41–45. Brighton.Google Scholar
2001Multiple Discourse Occurrence: Creating Hierarchicies for Natural Languages Generation. MA dissertation. University of Brighton.
Onea, Edgar, and Anna Volodina
2011 “Between Specification and Explanation: About a German Discourse Particle.” International Review of Pragmatics 3 (1): 3–32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pinto, Derrin, and Donny Vigil
2020 “Spanish Clicks in Discourse Marker Combinations.” Journal of Pragmatics 159: 1–11. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Redeker, Gisela
1990 “Ideational and Pragmatic Markers of Discourse Structure.” Journal of Pragmatics 14 (3): 367–381. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah
2001 “Discourse Markers: Language, Meaning, and Context.” In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, ed. by Deborah Schiffrin, Deborah Tannen, and Heidi E. Hamilton, 54–74. Malden. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2006 “Discourse Marker Research and Theory: Revisiting and. In Approaches to Discourse Particles, ed. by Kerstin Fischer, 315–338. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Schourup, Lawrence
1999 “Discourse Markers.” Lingua, 107 (3–4): 227–265. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Siebold, Kathrin
2021 “German dann – From Adverb to Discourse Marker.” Journal of Pragmatics 175: 129–145. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stilo, Donald
2004 “Coordination in Three Western Iranian Languages: Vafsi, Persian and Gilaki.” In Coordinating Constructions, ed. by Martin Haspelmath, 269–330. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sweetser, Eve
1990From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vanderbauwhede, Gudrun, and Béatrice Lamiroy
2020 “On Two French Discourse Markers and Their Dutch Equivalents: d’ailleurs and par ailleurs.” Journal of Pragmatics 156: 168–175. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zoghdar-Moghadam, Reza, and Mohammad Dabirmoghadam
2002 “Contrastive Discourse Markers: The Case of “but” in English and “amma” in Persian.” Language Researches 7 (12), 55–76. [in Persian]Google Scholar