“can you tell me how to get there?”: Naturally-occurring versus role-play data in direction-giving

Jennifer D. Ewald

Abstract

This study takes up the current debate on natural versus elicited data in investigations on speech acts by comparing both types of data in a particular context, that of asking for and giving driving directions. An analysis of route-descriptions offered by male and female direction-givers in both natural and role-play settings revealed only one statistically significant sex-related difference: More male than female participants included mileage estimates in the natural setting but not in the role-play setting. However, when male and female participants’ responses were combined to compare natural with role-play direction-giving, the role-play participants exhibited several significantly different linguistic behaviors in terms of their use of verbal devices (e.g., landmarks, mileage estimates, stoplight estimates) throughout the interactional phases. Direction-givers, when acting in an authentic context that carries real-world consequences, unanimously recognized an indirect request for directions while the direction-givers in the role-play setting generally did not. Additionally, this study revealed that the cognitive behaviors and the conventionalization evident in “natural” direction-giving were lacking in the role-play exchanges. Finally, the role-play participants were generally more aware of their role as research participants than as direction-givers, an awareness that affected their linguistic behaviors.

Keywords:
Quick links
A browser-friendly version of this article is not yet available. View PDF
Allen, Gary L.
(2000) Principles and practices for communicating route knowledge. Applied Cognitive Psychology 14: 333–359. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Rachel E., Alistair J. Gill, and Justine Cassell
(2008) Reactive redundancy and listener comprehension in direction-giving. Proceedings of SIGDIAL, June 19–20, Columbus, Ohio. Crossref
Beebe, Leslie
(1994) Notebook data on power and the power of notebook data. Paper presented at the annual TESOL Conference, March, Baltimore, MD.
Beebe, Leslie, M. Cummings, and Martha Clark
(1996) Natural speech act data versus written questionnaire data: How data collection method affects speech act performance. In S.M. Gass, N. Joyce (eds.), Speech acts across cultures: Challenges to communication in a second language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 65–86.Google Scholar
Brown, Leonora N., Cindy J. Lahar, and James L. Mosley
(1998) Age and gender-related differences in strategy use for route information: A “map-present” direction-giving paradigm. Environment and Behavior 30.2: 123–143. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Andrew D.
(1996) Investigating the production of speech act sets. In S.M. Gass, J. Neu (eds.), Speech acts across cultures: Challenges to communication in a second language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 21–43.Google Scholar
Collett, Peter, and Gregory O’Shea
(1976) Pointing the way to a fictional place: A study of direction giving in Iran and England. European Journal of Social Psychology 6.4: 447–458. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Couclelis, Helen
(1996) Verbal directions for way-finding: Space, cognition, and language. In J. Portugali (ed.), The Construction of Cognitive Maps. Alphen a. Rijn: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 133–153. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coulmas, Florian
(1981) Introduction: Conversational Routine. In F. Coulmas, (ed.), Conversational Routine. Berlin: Mouton Publishers, pp. 1–18.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Demeter, Gusztav
(2007) Role-plays as a data collection method for research on apology speech acts. Simulation and Gaming 38.1: 83–90. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ewald, Jennifer
(2010) “Do you know where X is?”: Direction-giving and male/female direction-givers. Journal of Pragmatics 42.9: 2549–2561. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Félix-Brasdefer, J. César
(2003) Validity in data collection methods in pragmatics research. In P. Kempchinsky, and C.E. Piñeros (eds.), Theory, Practice, and Acquisition. Papers from the 6th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium and the 5th Conference on the Acquisition of Spanish and Portuguese. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, pp. 239–257.Google Scholar
Félix-Brasdefer, J.César
(2007) Natural speech vs. elicited data. Spanish in Context 4.2: 159–185. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Golding, Jonathan M., Arthur C. Graesser, and Jerry Hauselt
(1996) The process of answering direction-giving questions when someone is lost on a university campus: The role of pragmatics. Applied Cognitive Psychology 10: 23–39. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grice, H. Paul
(1975) Logic and conversation. In P. Cole, and J. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and Semantics, Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harrell, W. Andrew, Jeffrey W. Bowlby, and Deana Hall-Hoffarth
(2000) Direction wayfinders with maps: The effects of gender, age, route complexity, and familiarity with the environment. The Journal of Social Psychology 140.2: 169–178. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harris, Lauren Julius
(1981) Sex-related variations in spatial skill. In L. Liben, N. Newcombe, and A. Paterson (eds.), Spatial Representation and Behavior Across the Life Span. New York: Academic Press, pp. 83–125.Google Scholar
Hartford, Beverly S., and Kathleen Bardovi-Harlig
(1992) Experimental and observational data in the study of interlanguage pragmatics. Pragmatics and Language Learning 3: 33–52.Google Scholar
Jung, Euen Hyuk (Sarah)
(2004) Interlanguage pragmatics: Apology speech acts. In C.L. Moder, and A. Martinovic-Zic (eds.), Discourse Across Languages and Cultures. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 99–116. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kasper, Gabriele, and Merete Dahl
(1991) Research methods in interlanguage pragmatics. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 13: 215–247. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Klein, Wolfgang
(1982) Local deixis in route directions. In R.J. Jarvella, and W. Klein (eds.), Speech, Place, and Action. PLACE: John Wiley and Sons, pp. 161–181.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Lawton, Carol A.
(2001) Gender and regional differences in spatial referents used in direction giving. Sex Roles 44.5-6: 321–337. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mark, David M., and Michael D. Gould
(1995) Wayfinding directions as discourse: Verbal directions in English and Spanish. In J.F. Duchan, G.A. Bruder, and L.E. Hewitt (eds.), Deixis in Narrative. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 387–405.Google Scholar
Miller, Leon K., and Viana Santoni
(1986) Sex differences in spatial abilities: Strategic and experiential correlates. Acta Psychologica 62.3: 225–235. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Napoleon, Siena
(2007) From here to there: A sociolinguistic study in gender and direction-giving. Indiana Undergraduate Journal of Cognitive Science 2: 18–27.Google Scholar
Pearson, Bethyl A., and K. Samuel Lee
(1992) Discourse structure of direction giving: Effects of native/nonnative speaker status and gender. TESOL Quarterly 26.1: 113–127. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Psathas, George
(1986) Some sequential structures in direction-giving. Human Studies 9: 231–246. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Psathas, George, and Martin Kozloff
(1976) The structure of directions. Semiotica 17.2: 111–130. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Scotton, Carol M., and Janice Bernsten
(1988) Natural conversations as a model for textbook dialogue. Applied Linguistics 9.4: 372–384. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Ward, Shawn L., Nora Newcombe, and Willis F. Overton
(1986) Turn left at the church, or three miles north: a study of direction giving and sex differences. Environment and Behavior 18.2: 192–213. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wunderlich, Dieter, and Rudolph Reinelt
(1982) How to get there from here. In R.J. Jarvella, and W. Klein (eds.), Speech, Place, and Action. PLACE: John Wiley and Sons, pp. 183–201.Google Scholar