The role of multimodality and intertextuality in accentuating humor in Algerian Hirak’s posters

Mohammed Nahar Al-Ali and Badra Hadj Djelloul
Abstract

This study investigates how the interaction between multimodal modes and intertextual resources accentuates humor functions. Kress and van Leeuwen’s Visual Grammar (2006) was adopted to analyze a set of sixty humorous online posters of Hirak’s movements. The results revealed that humor was generated from the purposeful interplay of various semiotic modes and the reproduction and recontextualization of shared socio-cultural and political resources. The protesters utilized cartoon characters, religious discourse, folk traditions, and cultural mundane to represent the authority’s members humorously as lawbreakers, prisoners, robbers, and gangsters. This humorous exposition has placed the authority members outside the Algerian societal in-group boundaries. In contrast, such a device has enhanced conformity among the protesters and exhibited their superiority over the ruling outer group. We hope such an investigation will pave the grounds for further studies and provide insights into multimodal discourse analysis.

Keywords:
Publication history
Table of contents

Recently, the Arab world has witnessed massive uprisings, and political and military movements that engulfed various Arab countries. These movements are considered public acts aiming at political and social changes and reforms. After the Tunisian 2010 revolution’s success, protests swiped quickly to other Arab countries like Egypt, Syria, Libya, Lebanon, and Algeria (Hussein 2015; Bentahar 2020). These uprisings and revolutions were due to low living standards, oppressive governing systems, lack of democracy, violation of human rights, unemployment, poverty, weak health care, and lack of food price control (Lahlali 2014; Nassar 2020). Although these uprisings occurred in different countries, most of them called for the overthrow of the ruling regimes, under the famous slogan ash-shaʻb yurīd isqāṭ an-niẓām “The people want to bring down the regime” (Abulof 2011). Some uprisings achieved their goals in challenging violent circumstances although the protestors confronted severe suppression by the ruling authorities. However, some movements occurred peacefully with minor cases of violence.

Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price. Direct PDF access to this article can be purchased through our e-platform.

References

Abdelhai, Nour El-Houda
2021 “A Multimodal Discourse Analysis of Impoliteness Strategies in Algerian Hirak Protests.” PhD dissertation. University of Jordan.
Abu Hatab, Wafa
2016 “The Arab Spring: A New Era of Humor Consumption and Production.” International Journal of English Linguistics 6 (3): 70–87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Abulof, Uriel
2011 “What Is the Arab Third Estate?Huffington Post. Available at: https://​www​.huffpost​.com​/entry​/what​-is​-the​-arab​-third​-es​_b​_832628. (Accessed 10 December 2021).
Al-Momani, Kawakib, Mohammad Badarneh, and Fathi Migdadi
2017 “A Semiotic Analysis of Political Cartoons in Jordan in Light of the Arab Spring.” Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 30 (1): 63–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barahmeh, Yousef
2020 “Carnivalesque Politics and Popular Resistance: A Bakhtinian Reading of Contemporary Jordanian Political Humor.” PhD dissertation. University of Portsmouth.
Bazerman, Charles
2004 “Intertextuality: How Texts Rely on Other Texts”. In What Writing Does and How It Does It: An Introduction to Analyzing Texts and Textual Practices, ed. by Charles Bazerman, and Paul Prior, 83–96. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bentahar, Ziad
2020 “ ‘Ytnahaw ga’!’: Algeria’s Cultural Revolution and the Role of Language in the Early Stages of the Spring 2019 Hirak .” Journal of African Cultural Studies 33 (4): 1–17.Google Scholar
Bhatia, Vijay
2004Worlds of Written Discourse. Lonon: Continuum.Google Scholar
Camps-Febrer, Blanca
2012 “Political Humor as a Confrontational Tool against the Syrian Regime.” ICIP Working Papers 2012/18 https://​ddd​.uab​.cat​/record​/126331​?ln​=en (accessed 2 June 2022).
Cheong, Yin
2004 “The Construal of Ideational Meaning in Print Advertisements.” In Multimodal Discourse Analysis: Systemic Functional Perspectives, ed. by Kay L. O’Halloran, 163–195. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Čmejrková, Světla
2006 “Cultural Specifics of Advertising in Czech: Intertextuality and Interdiscursivity”. Linguistica Pragensia (2): 77–92.Google Scholar
Cook, Guy
2001The Discourse of Advertising, 2nd ed. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Douglas, Mary
1975Implicit Meanings. London: Rutledge.Google Scholar
Dynel, Marta
2011 “Entertaining and Enraging the Functions of Verbal Violence in Broadcast Political Debates”. In Studies in Political Humor in between Political Critique and Public Entertainments, ed. by Villy Tsakona, and Diana Popa, 109–133. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eagleton, Terry
2019Humor. London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael
1994An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 2nd edition. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Hart, Marjolein’t
2007 “Humour and Social Protest: An Introduction.” Internationaal Instituut voor Social Geschiedenis 52: 1–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Helmy, Mohammed, and Sabine Frerichs
2013 “Stripping the Boss: The Powerful Role of Humour in the Egyptian Revolution 2011.” Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science 47 (4): 450–481. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hussein, Omar
2015 “A Sociolinguistic Study of the Slogans of the Syrian Revolution.” Unpublished MA Thesis. Yarmouk University.
Jewitt, Carey
2009 “An Introduction to Multimodality.” In The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis, ed. by Carey Jewitt, 14–27. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kress, Gunther, and Theo van Leeuwen
2006Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lahlali, El Mustafa
2014 “The Discourse of Egyptian Slogans: From ‘Long Live Sir’ to ‘Down with the Dictator’.” Arab Media & Society 19: 1–19.Google Scholar
Lemke, Jay
1995Textual Politics: Discourse and Social Dynamics. London: Tayler & Francis.Google Scholar
Mansouri, Nadim
2013The Sociology of the Internet. Beirut: Muntada Almaarif.Google Scholar
Martin, Rod
2007The Psychology of Humor: An Integrative Approach. Elsevier Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matheson, Donald
2005Media Discourses: Analyzing Media Texts. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Mifdal, Mohamed
2016 “Digital Politics on Facebook during the Arab Spring in Morocco: Adaptive Strategies of Satire Relative to its Political and Cultural Context.” European Journal of Humor Research 4 (3): 43–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moalla, Asma
2013 “Tunisian in the Aftermath of the Revolution: Insights into the Use of Humor on Facebook to Create Social Bonds and Develop Relational Identity.” SAGE Open July-September 2013: 1–7.Google Scholar
2015 “Incongruity in the Generation and Perception of Humor on Facebook in the Aftermath of the Tunisian Revolution.” Journal of Pragmatics 75: 44–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morreal, John
2005 “Humour and the Conduct of Politics.” In Beyond the Joke the Limits of Humour, ed. by Sharon Lockyer, and Michael Pickering, 63–78. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmilla. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morva, Oya
2016 “The Humorous Language of Street Dissent: A Discourse Analysis on the Graffiti of the Gezi Park Protests”. European Journal of Humour Research 4 (2): 19–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nassar, Mahmoud
2020 “A Socio-pragmatic Study of the Lebanese Uprising Slogans.” PhD dissertation. University of Jordan.
Noelle-Neuman, Elizabeth
1991 “The Theory of Public Opinion: The Concept of the Spiral of Silence.” In Communication Yearbook, ed. by James Anderson, 256–287. Newbury Park: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paltridge, Brain
2012Discourse Analysis: An Introduction. Continuum International Publishing Group. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pearce, Katy, and Adnan Hajizada
2014 “No Laughing Humor as a Means of Dissent in the Digital Era: The Case of Authoritarian Azerbaijan.” The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization 22 (1): 67–85.Google Scholar
Raskin, Victor
1985Semantic Mechanisms of Humor. Dordrecht: Reidel Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Royce, Terry
2007 “Intersemiotic Complementarity: A Framework for Multimodal Discourse Analysis.” In New Directions in the Analysis of Multimodal Discourse, ed. by Terry Royce, and Wendy Bowcher, 63–109. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Schwarz, Jeannine
2010 “Linguistic Aspects of Verbal Humor in Stand-up Comedy.” PhD dissertation. Saarland University.
Scott, James
1990Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts. Ann Arbor: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Tsakona, Villy, and Diana Popa
2011 “Humour in Political and the Politics of Humour: An Introduction.” In Studies in Political Humour in Between Political Critique and Public Entertainments, ed. by Villy Tsakona, and Diana Popa, 1–30. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, Wei
2004 “A Contrastive Analysis of Letters to the Editor in Chinese and English.” Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 27: 72–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wieczorek, Magdalena
2021 “Humour as a Carrier of Meaning in Sitcom Discourse: A Data-Based Study from A Relevance Theoretic Perceptive.” PhD dissertation. Warsaw University.