Concepts and context in relevance-theoretic pragmatics: New developments

Agnieszka Piskorska and Manuel Padilla Cruz
Publication history
Table of contents

Overall, this special issue is to be situated within relevance-theoretic pragmatics (Sperber and Wilson 1986, 1995; Wilson and Sperber 2002, 2004, 2012), the cognitive framework that seeks to explain why, out of the various interpretations of an utterance which are compatible with what is encoded in its linguistic form, the hearer ends up selecting but just one of them and thinking that it is the interpretation that the speaker intends to communicate. However, in addition to showcasing some of relevance theorists’ current concerns, recent research, and latest developments, this special issue chiefly aims to celebrate the most valuable contribution to this framework and its subsequent evolution made by one of its proponents and founding scholars: Professor Deirdre Wilson. During her most fruitful and illuminating career, she has been an active member of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) and has been well known for her interest in a variety of pragmatics-related topics, which include procedural meaning, lexical pragmatics, figurative language, literary communication, non-propositional effects or metarepresentational abilities, to name but some.

Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price. Direct PDF access to this article can be purchased through our e-platform.

References

Barsalou, Lawrence W.
1983 “Ad Hoc Categories.” Memory & Cognition 11: 211–227. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blakemore, Diane
1987Semantic Constraints on Relevance. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
1992Understanding Utterances. An Introduction to Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2002Relevance and Linguistic Meaning. The Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carston, Robyn
1997 “Enrichment and Loosening: Complementary Processes in Deriving the Proposition Expressed.” Linguistiche Berichte 8: 103–127. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000 “Explicature and Semantics.” UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 12: 1–44.Google Scholar
2002aThoughts and Utterances. The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002b “Metaphor, Ad Hoc Concepts and Word Meaning – More Questions than Answers.” UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 14: 83–105.Google Scholar
2010 “Lexical Pragmatics, Ad Hoc Concepts and Metaphor: From a Relevance Theory Perspective.” Italian Journal of Linguistics 22 (1): 153–180.Google Scholar
2012 “Metaphor and the Literal/Nonliteral Distinction.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by Keith Allan, and Kasia M. Jaszczolt, 469–492. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 “Word Meaning, What Is Said and Explicature.” In What Is Said and What Is Not, ed. by Carlo Penco, and Filippo Domaneschi, 175–204. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
2016 “The Heterogeneity of Procedural Meaning.” Lingua 175–176: 154–166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carston, Robyn, and Catherine Wearing
2011 “Metaphor, Hyperbole and Simile: A Pragmatic Approach.” Language and Cognition 3 (2): 283–312. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Saussure, Louis
2012 “Temporal Reference in Discourse.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by Keith Allan, and Kasia Jaszczolt, 423–446. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2022 “Pragmatic Resolutions of Temporal and Aspectual Mismatches.” Pragmatics & Cognition 28 (2): 228–251. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Falkum, Ingrid L.
2019 “Metaphor and Metonymy in Acquisition: A Relevance Theoretic Perspective.” In Relevance: Pragmatics and Interpretation, ed. by Kate Scott, Robyn Carston, and Billy Clark, 205–217. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fodor, Jerry A.
1983The Modularity of Mind. Cambridge: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grice, Herbert P.
1975 “Logic and Conversation.” In Syntax and Semantics. Vol. 3: Speech Acts, ed. by Peter Cole, and Jerry Morgan, 41–59. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Grisot, Cristina, Bruno Cartoni, and Jacques Moeschler
2016 “Conceptual and Procedural Information for Verb Tense Disambiguation: The English Simple Past.” In Relevance Theory. Recent Developments, Current Challenges and Future Directions, ed. by Manuel Padilla Cruz, 103–143. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hall, Alison
2007 “Do Discourse Connectives Encode Concepts or Procedures?Lingua 117 (1): 149–174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 “Ad Hoc Concepts: Atomic or Decompositional.” UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 23: 1–10.Google Scholar
2017 “Lexical Pragmatics, Explicature and Ad Hoc Concepts.” In Semantics and Pragmatics: Drawing a Line, ed. by Ilse Depraetere, and Raphael Salkie, 55–100. Cham: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jary, Mark
2016 “Rethinking Explicit Utterance Content.” Journal of Pragmatics 102: 24–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H.
1993 “The Discourse Marker Well: A Relevance-theoretical Account.” Journal of Pragmatics 19 (5): 435–452. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moeschler, Jacques
2016 “Where Is Procedural Meaning Located? Evidence from Discourse Connectives and Tenses.” Lingua 175–176: 122–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Padilla Cruz, Manuel
2019 “Qualifying Insults, Offensive Epithets, Slurs and Expressive Expletives: A Relevance-Theoretic Approach.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 7 (2): 156–181. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2020 “Towards a Relevance-Theoretic Approach to the Diminutive Morpheme.” Russian Journal of Linguistics 24 (4): 774–795. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2022a “Is Free Enrichment Always Free? Revisiting Ad Hoc-Concept Construction.” Journal of Pragmatics 187: 130–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2022b “On the Interpretation of Utterances with Expressive Expletives.” Pragmatics & Cognition 28 (2): 252–276. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scott, Kate
2011 “Beyond Reference: Concepts, Procedures and Referring Expressions.” In Procedural Meaning: Problems and Perspectives, ed. by Victoria Escandell Vidal, Manuel Leonetti, and Aoife Ahern, 183–203. Bingley: Emerald. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 “This and That: A Procedural Analysis.” Lingua 131: 49–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016 “Pronouns and Procedures: Reference and Beyond.” Lingua 175–176: 69–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson
1986Relevance. Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
1995Relevance. Communication and Cognition, 2nd edition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
1998 “The Mapping between the Mental and the Public Lexicon.” In Language and Thought: Interdisciplinary Themes, ed. by Peter Carruthers, and Jill Boucher, 184–200. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 “A Deflationary Account of Metaphors.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, ed. by Raymond W. Gibbs, 84–105. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wałaszeska, Ewa
2011 “Broadening and Narrowing in Lexical Development: How Relevance Theory Can Account for Children’s Overextensions and Underextensions.” Journal of Pragmatics 43 (1): 314–326. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre
2004 “Relevance and Lexical Pragmatics.” UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 16: 343–360.Google Scholar
2011a “Procedural Meaning: Past, Present, Future.” In Procedural Meaning: Problems and Perspectives, ed. by Victoria Escandell Vidal, Manuel Leonetti, and Aoife Ahern, 3–31. Bingley: Emerald. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011b “Parallels and Differences in the Treatment of Metaphor in Relevance Theory and Cognitive Linguistics.” Intercultural Pragmatics 8 (2): 177–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 “Modality and the Conceptual–Procedural Distinction.” In Relevance Theory: More than Understanding, ed. by Ewa Wałaszewska, and Agnieszka Piskorska, 23–43. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre, and Robyn Carston
2006 “Metaphor, Relevance and the ‘Emergent Property’ Issue.” Mind & Language 21 (3): 404–433. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007 “A Unitary Approach to Lexical Pragmatics: Relevance, Inference and Ad Hoc Concepts.” In Pragmatics, ed. by Noel Burton-Roberts, 230–259. Basingstoke: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre
2016 “Reassessing the Conceptual-Procedural Distinction.” Lingua 175–176: 5–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre, and Dan Sperber
1993 “Linguistic Form and Relevance.” Lingua 90 (1): 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002 “Relevance Theory.” UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 14: 249–287.Google Scholar
2004 “Relevance Theory.” In The Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by Larry Horn, and Gregory Ward, 607–632. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2012Meaning and Relevance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar