Metaphors to describe sanctions against Iran in American and Iranian newspapers

Rasoul Mohammad Hosseinpur and Mahdi Mansouri
University of Qom

Abstract

Since Iran’s 1979 revolution, Sanctions Against Iran (SAI) has been one of the most crucial issues concerning Iran and the US’ relationships, and both parties employ different metaphors to depict the situation in line with their own ideologies. This study explored the conceptual metaphors (CM) concerning the sanctions against Iran in two corpora of the editorials and news extracted from an international American newspaper (New York Times) and a local Iranian English press (Iran Daily). Following Charteris-Black’s (2004) framework for Critical Metaphor Analysis, sixty editorial news texts (thirty for each), since 2013 until 2021, were scrutinized for the CMs in the two corpora. The findings revealed that although both newspapers took advantage of the metaphors in description of the sanctions against Iran, there were significant differences between them in the employment of the CMs. The American newspaper enjoyed more frequent and diverse metaphors to represent the sanctions compared to the Iranian newspaper, and “SAI is a pain/illness” (22.7%) was the most frequent conceptual metaphor in the New York Times whereas “SAI is a human” (32.4%) and “SAI is a journey” (18.9%) were the common metaphors in Iran Daily. The results suggest how language could be manipulated to serve different purposes.

Keywords:
Publication history

Date received: 20 October 2022

Date accepted: 11 December 2023

Published online: 14 May 2024

Table of contents

Over the years, sanctions have had a serious impact on Iran’s economy and people. Since 1979, especially in the last decade, the United States has used sanctions against Iran to make changes in Iran’s behavior and policies, including Iran’s nuclear program, which Western governments claim is going to be used for nuclear weapons. Iran, on the other hand, counters these accusations and states that its nuclear program is for civilian purposes, such as medical purposes and generating energy. Therefore, both parties make use of discursive devices such as metaphors to describe the sanctions based on their own ideology.

Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price. Direct PDF access to this article can be purchased through our e-platform.

References

Ansah, Gladys Nyarko
2014 “Culture in Embodied Cognition: Metaphorical/Metonymic Conceptualizations of FEAR in Akan and English”. Metaphor and Symbol 29 (1): 44–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bratoz, Silva
2012 “Slovenian and US Elections in Metaphors: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective”. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis Across Disciplines 5 (2): 120–136.Google Scholar
Cameron, Lynne
2007 “Patterns of Metaphor Use in Reconciliation Talk”. Discourse and Society 18 (2): 197–222. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Charteris-Black, Jonathan
2004 Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005 Politicians and Rhetoric: The Persuasive Power of Metaphor. London: Palgrave MacMillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 Politicians and Rhetoric: The Persuasive Power of Metaphor (2nd ed.). London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 Analyzing Political Speeches: Rhetoric, Discourse and Metaphor. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chi, Amy
2016 “A Review of Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English”. Lexicography 2 (2): 179–186. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chilton, Paul
2004 Analyzing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fallah, Nahid, and Mohammad Raouf Moini
2016 “A Critical Metaphor Analysis of Arab Uprisings in The Washington Post and Keyhan Editorials”. Metaphor and the Social World 6 (1): 79–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Farahani, Ali Akbar, and Zohreh Adeli Jam
2019 “The Role of Metaphorical Language in the Critical Discourse Analysis of Western Political Texts”. Journal of Language and Translation 9 (1): 17–31.Google Scholar
Farrokhi, Farahman, Ali Akbar Ansarin, and Somayeh Ashrafi
2019 “A Comparative Study of Conceptual Metaphors in English and Persian Newspapers”. International Journal of English Language and Translation Studies 7 (3): 80–92.Google Scholar
George, Darren, and Paul Mallery
2019 IBM SPSS Statistics 26 Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gray, Colin, and Paul Kinnear
2012 IBM SPSS Statistics 19 Made Simple. Aberdeen: Psychology Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
He, Qingshun, and Bingjun Yang
2018 “A Corpus-Based Study of the Correlation between Text Technicality and Ideational Metaphor in English”. Lingua 203: 51–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Zoltan
2010 Metaphor: A Practical Introduction (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2020 Extended Conceptual Metaphor Theory. London: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2021 “Standard and Extended Conceptual Theory Revisited: Some Definitional and Taxonomic Issues”. In The Routledge Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, ed. by Wen Xu, and John R. Taylor, 191–204. New York, NY: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George
1993 “The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor”. In Metaphor and Thought, ed. by Andrew Ortony, 202–251. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson
1980 Metaphors We Live By. Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
1999 Philosophy in the Flesh. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English
(6th ed.) 2014 Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.Google Scholar
Macmillan English Dictionary
2009 New Delhi: Macmillan Education LimitedGoogle Scholar
Nartey, Mark
2018 “Football in Computer-Mediated Discourse: A Move Analysis of Match Reviews”. Linguistik Online 89 (2): 37–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nordquist, Richard
2018 “What Is Personification?” ThoughtCo. https://​www​.thoughtco​.com​/what​-is​-personification​-1691766 (accessed December 6, 2023).
Pragglejaz Group
2007 “MIP: A Method for Identifying Metaphorically Used Words in Discourse”. Metaphor and Symbol 22 (1): 1–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reddy, Michael
1979 “The Conduit Metaphor”. Metaphor and Thought 2: 285–324.Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, Francisco
2020 “Understanding Figures of Speech: Dependency Relations and Organizational Patterns”. Language and Communication 71: 16–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steen, Gerard
2007 “Finding Metaphor in Discourse: Pragglejaz and Beyond”. Culture, Language, and Representation 5: 9–25.Google Scholar
Suárez-Campos, Laura, Alberto Hijazo-Gascón, and Iraide Ibarretxe-Antuñano
2019 “Metaphor and Spanish as a Foreign Language”. In Metaphor in Foreign Language Instruction, ed. by Ana Piquer-Píriz, and Rafael Alejo-González, 79–98. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun A.
1995 “Opinions and Ideologies in Editorials”. In 4th International Symposium of Critical Discourse Analysis, Language, Social Life and Critical Thought, Athens, 14–16.Google Scholar
1998 Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Yu, Ning, Lu Yu, and Yue Christine Lee
2017 “Primary Metaphors: Importance as Size and Weight in a Comparative Perspective”. Metaphor and Symbol 32 (4): 231–249. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zibin, Aseel
2020 “A Corpus-Based Study of Metaphors Used to Describe Syrian Refugees in Jordanian Politico-Economic Discourse: A Critical Metaphor Analysis Approach”. Pragmatics and Society 11 (4): 640–663. DOI logoGoogle Scholar