Brazilian Portuguese wh-clefts in a multilevel analytic perspective
Abstract
This paper presents a study on the distribution of wh-clefts – i.e. those having a nominal phrase in the cleft constituent position – in a corpus of TV interviews spoken in Brazilian Portuguese. This language variety has three types of wh-clefts, dubbed canonical, reversed and extraposed, which are analyzed in three levels: the informational-structural level, regarding the types of focus patterns; the macro-discursive level, on how these constructions distribute into topical-chain segments; and the micro-discursive level, with special attention to the rhetorical relations connecting wh-clefts to their immediate contexts. Nevertheless, only the two first levels are crucial for assessing their distribution. We put forward that the results may be explained by the features [unexpectedness] and [topicality], distributed hierarchically, since the first one forces a contextual question to become explicit, as canonical wh-clefts are considered to embed a semi-rhetorical question. The conclusion is that the notion of ‘prominence’ can connect the various results.
Keywords:
Publication history
Table of contents
Some constructions in natural language are used in specific contexts and signal the organization of discourse. Among these, we focus on wh-cleft constructions, a subgroup of clefts which have not been profoundly studied regarding their discourse distribution in the domain of Romance languages (De Cesare 2017, 561).
References
Aleixo, Felipe
2015 “Estrutura informacional e clivagem: Análise da veiculação de informação em construções clivadas do
português brasileiro contemporâneo escrito. [Information structure and
clefting: Analysis of information expression in cleft constructions of written contemporary Brazilian
Portuguese].” MA thesis. State University of São
Paulo. http://hdl.handle.net/11449/136077
Andrade, Aroldo Leal
de
2019 “Assessing the Emergence of
Reduced Clefts in Brazilian Portuguese: Rhetoric Structure, Information Structure and
Syntax.” Revista
Letras 99: 101–126. 
Antonio, Juliano
Desiderato
2009 “Os usos
do agora em elocuções formais e em entrevistas orais. [The
uses of agora in formal speech and in oral interviews].” Revista de Estudos da
Linguagem 17 (2): 189–214.
Asher, Nicholas, Phillipe Muller, Myriam Bras, Lydia
Mai Ho-Dac, Farah Benamara, Stergos Afantenos, and Laure Vieu
2017 “ANNODIS
and Related Projects: Case Studies on the Annotation of Discourse
Structure.” In Handbook of Linguistic
Annotation, ed. by Nancy Ide, and James Pustejovsky, 1241–1264. Dordrecht: Springer.
Barbosa, Maria do Pilar
Pereira
2013 “As
construções pseudoclivadas: perguntas e respostas. [Pseudocleft
constructions: questions and answers].” In Textos
Selecionados, XXVIII Encontro Nacional da Associação Portuguesa de Linguística [Selected Texts, XXVIII National Meeting of the Portuguese Association of Linguistics], ed.
by Fátima Silva, Isabel Falé, Isabel Pereira, and João Veloso, 131–148. Lisbon: Colibri/APL. https://apl.pt/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/BARBOSA_2013.pdf
Braga, Maria
Luísa, Mary Kato, and Carlos Mioto
2015 “As construções-Q no português brasileiro falado [
Wh-constructions in spoken Brazilian
Portuguese].” In Gramática do português culto falado no
Brasil, vol. 3 [Grammar of cultured Portuguese spoken in
Brazil], ed. by Mary Kato, and Milton
do Nascimento, 187–227. São
Paulo: Fapesp/Contexto.
Braga, Maria
Luísa, Diego Leite
de Oliveira, and Elisiene de
Melo Barbosa
2013 “Gradiência e variação nas construções de foco no português brasileiro [Gradience and variation in focus constructions in Brazilian Portuguese].” Cadernos
de Letras da
UFF 23 (47): 29–43.
Carlson, Lynn, and Daniel Marcu
2001 Discourse
Tagging Reference Manual. Los Angeles: University of
Southern California.
Colléter, Maud, Cécile Fabre, Lydia-Mai Ho-Dac, Maria
Paule Péry-Woodey, Josette Rebeyrolle, and Ludovic Tanguy
2012 “La ressource ANNODIS multi-échelle: guide d’annotation et bonus [The multilevel resource ANNODIS: annotation guide and bonus].” Carnets de
grammaire
20
. Technical report
CLLE-ERSS. Toulouse: Université de Toulouse-Jean
Jaurès.
Collins, Peter
C.
1991 Cleft and Pseudo-Cleft Constructions in
English. London: Routledge.
Costa, João, and Inês Duarte
2001 “Minimizando a estrutura: uma análise unificada das construções de clivagem em
português [Minimizing the structure: a unified analysis of cleft
constructions in Portuguese].” In Actas do XVI Encontro
Nacional da Associação Portuguesa de Linguística, Coimbra, 2000 [Proceedings of
the 16th National Meeting of the Portuguese Linguistics Association], ed.
by Clara Correia, and Anabela Gonçalves, 627–238. Lisbon: APL/Colibri.
De
Cesare, Anna-Maria
2017 “Cleft
Constructions.” In Manual of Romance Morphosyntax and
Syntax, ed. by Andreas Dufter, and Elisabeth Starke, 536–568. Berlin/New
York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Declerck, Renaat
1988 Studies
on Copular Sentences, Clefts and
Pseudo-Clefts. Leuven/Dordrecht: Leuven University
Press/Foris.
Delin, Judy
L.
1990 “A Multilevel Account of Cleft
Constructions in Discourse.” Proceedings of 13th Conference on Computational
Linguistics 2: 83–88.
Delin, Judy, and Jon Oberlander
1995 “Syntactic
Constraints on Discourse Structure. The Case of
It-Clefts.” Linguistics 33 (3): 465–500.
Den
Dikken, Marcel, André Meinunger, and Chris Wilder
2000 “Pseudoclefts
and Ellipsis.” Studia
Linguistica 54 (1): 41–89.
Dufter, Andreas
2009 “Clefting
and Discourse Organization: Comparing Germanic and Romance.” In Focus
and Background in Romance Languages, ed. by Andreas Dufter, and Daniel Jacob, 83–121. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John
Benjamins.
Escandell-Vidal, M.
Victoria, and Manuel Leonetti
2009 “La expresión del Verum Focus en español [The expression of
verum focus in current-day Spanish].” Español
Actual 92: 11–46.
Gast, Volker, and Natalia Levshina
2014 “Motivating
W(h)-Clefts in English and German: A Hypothesis-Driven Parallel Corpus
Study.” In Frequency, Forms and Functions of Cleft Constructions in
Romance and Germanic: Contrastive, Corpus-Based Studies, ed. by Anna-Maria Cesare, 377–414. Berlin/Munich/Boston: De
Gruyter Mouton.
Gast, Volker, and Daniel Wiechmann
2012 “W(h)-clefts im Deutschen und Englischen. Eine quantitative Untersuchung auf Grundlage des
Europarl-Korpus [W(h)-clefts in German and English. A quantitative study
based on the Europarl corpus].” In Deutsch im
Sprachvergleich. Grammatische Kontraste und Konvergenzen [Comparative German.
Grammatical contrasts and convergences], ed. by Lutz Gunkel, and Gisela Zifonun, 333–362. Berlin/Boston: de
Gruyter.
Gessler, Luke, Yang Liu, and Amir Zeldes
2019 “A
Discourse Signal Annotation System for RST Trees.” In Proceedings of
Discourse Relation Treebanking and Parsing (DISRPT
2019), 56–61. Minneapolis: Association
for Computational Linguistics.
Giora, Rachel
2003 On
Our Mind: Salience, Context and Figurative
Language. Oxford: Oxford University
Press.
Givón, Talmy
2001 Syntax,
vol. 1. 2nd
edition. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John
Benjamins.
Hedberg, Nancy
1990 “Discourse
Pragmatics and Cleft Sentences in English.” PhD
dissertation. University of Minnesota. http://www.sfu.ca/~hedberg/Hedberg_1990_Dissertation_Complete.pdf
Hedberg, Nancy, and Lorna Fadden
2007 “The
Information Structure of It-Clefts, Wh-Clefts and Reverse Wh-Clefts in
English.” In The Grammar-Pragmatics Interface: Essays in Honor of
Jeanette Gundel, ed. by Nancy Hedberg, and Ron Zacharski, 49–76. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John
Benjamins.
Huddleston, Rodney
1984 Introduction
to the Grammar of English. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Klein, Wolfgang, and Christiane
von Stutterheim
1987 “
Quaestio und referentielle Bewegung in Erzählungen [
Quaestio and referential movement in narratives].” Linguistische
Berichte 109: 163–183.
Klima, Edward, and Ursula Bellugi-Klima
1969 “Syntactic
Regularities in the Speech of Children.” In Modern Studies in
English, ed. by David
A. Reibel, and Sanford
A. Schane, 448–466. Englewood
Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Krifka, Manfred, and Renate Musan
2012 “Information
Structure: Overview and Linguistic Issues.” In The Expression of
Information Structure, ed. by Manfred Krifka, and Renate Musan, 1–44. Berlin: De
Gruyter.
Lee, Chungmin
2003 “Contrastive
Topic and/or Contrastive Focus.” In Japanese/Korean Linguistics, vol.
12, ed. by William McClure. Stanford: CSLI. http://semanticsarchive.net/Archive/mQ5MW-MyY/jk12Lee.pdf
Lobo, Maria
2006 “Assimetrias em construções de clivagem do português: movimento vs. geração na
base [Asymmetries among Portuguese cleft constructions: movement vs.
base-generation].” In Textos Selecionados, XXI Encontro
Nacional da Associação Portuguesa de Linguística [Selected Texts, XXI National
Meeting of the Portuguese Association of Linguistics], ed. by Joaquim Barbosa, and Fátima Oliveira, 457–473. Lisbon: Colibri/APL. https://apl.pt/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/2005-38.pdf
Mann, William
C., and Sandra
A. Thompson
1983 “Relational
Propositions in Discourse.” Research Report 83–115, Information
Sciences Institute, University of Southern California.
1988 “Rhetorical
Structure Theory: Toward a Functional Theory of Text
Organization.” Text 8 (3): 243–281.
Marcu, Daniel
1999 Instructions
for Manually Annotating the Discourse Structures of Texts. Ms. Information Sciences Institute,
University of Southern California.
Matthiessen, Christian, and Sandra
A. Thompson
1988 “The
Structure of Discourse and ‘Subordination.’” In Clause Combining in
Grammar and Discourse, ed. by John Haiman, and Sandra Thompson, 275–329. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John
Benjamins.
Menuzzi, Sérgio
2018 “Sobre a pressuposição das clivadas [On the presupposition of
clefts].” Revista da
Anpoll 46: 200–221.
Prince, Ellen
F.
1978 “A Comparison of
Wh-Clefts and It-Clefts in
Discourse.” Language 54, 883–906.
Repp, Sophie
2016 “Contrast:
Dissecting an Elusive Information-Structural Notion and Its Role in
Grammar.” In The Oxford Handbook of Information
Structure, ed. by Caroline Féry, and Shinichiro Ishihara, 270–289. Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
Riester, Arndt
2019 “Constructing
QuD trees” In Questions in Discourse, vol 2:
Pragmatics, ed. by Malte Zimmermann, Klaus
von Heusinger, and Edgar Onea, 164–193. Leiden: Brill.
Santos, Kátia Roseane
Cortez
2018 “Uma
investigação funcionalista das relações retóricas do campo da avaliação no português
falado [A functionalist investigation of rhetorical relations in the field
of evaluation in spoken Portuguese].” MA thesis. State
University of Maringá. https://docplayer.com.br/123991933-Universidade-estadual-de-maringa-centro-de-ciencias-humanas-letras-e-artes-programa-de-pos-graduacao-em-letras-mestrado-e-doutorado.html
Stede, Manfred, Maite Taboada, and Debopam Das
2017 Annotation
Guidelines for Rhetorical Structure. Ms., University of Potsdam and Simon Fraser
University.
Thompson, Sandra
A., and William
C. Mann
1987a “Antithesis:
A Study in Clause Combining and Discourse Structure.” In Language
Topics: Essays in Honour of Michael Halliday, vol. 2, ed. by Ross Steele, and Terry Threadgold, 359–384. Amsterdam, John
Benjamins.
1987b “A
Discourse View of Concession in Written English.” In Proceedings of
the Second Annual Pacific Linguistics Conference, ed. by Scott
C. DeLancey, and Russell
S. Tomlin, 435–447. Eugene: University
of Oregon.
Von
Heusinger, Klaus, and Petra Schumacher
2019 “Discourse
Prominence: Definition and Application.” Journal of
Pragmatics 154: 117–127.
Weinert, Regina, and Jim Miller
1996 “Cleft
Constructions in Spoken Language.” Journal of
Pragmatics 25, 173–205.