Syntax and music for interaction: ‘Music-taking-predicate’ constructions in Hebrew musician-to-musician discourse
YuvalGeva
University of Haifa
Abstract
Multimodal constructions which intertwine language and music are characteristic of the discourse of creative
encounters among musicians. This interactional linguistic study reports on one such construction: the ‘music-taking-predicate’
(MTP) construction. MTP constructions consist of a projective verbal predicate, and a stretch of sung or played musical expression
following it. Based on naturalistic video data of Hebrew-speaking musicians in rehearsals and production sessions, I show that
instances of this construction emerge as formulae for the achievement of several interactional tasks integral to the process of
joint music making.
When managing conversational exchanges in any setting, participants rarely rely on only one modality in order to get
interactional work done. Participants do things using a myriad of linguistic, embodied, visual, and environmental resources; and they
do so in an integrative, intertwined manner. Recent studies in interactional linguistics (IL) and multimodal conversation analysis
reveal that depending on an activity’s specific ecology, potentially every detail of an encounter can be turned into a resource for
social interaction (Mondada 2016, 338).
References
Bernstein, Leonard
1973The
Unanswered Question: Six Talks at Harvard. Cambridge, MA;
London: Harvard University Press.
Blythe, Carl Jr., Sigrid Recktenwald, and Jenny Wang
1990 “ ‘I’m
Like ‘Say What?!’: A New Quotative.” American
Speech 65: 215–227.
Bright, William
1963 “Language
and Music: Areas for
Cooperation.” Ethnomusicology 7 (1): 26–32.
Chafe, Wallace
1994Discourse,
Consciousness, and Time: The Flow and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speaking and
Writing. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago
Press.
Du
Bois, John
W., Sussana Cumming, Stephan Schuetze-Coburn, and Danae Paolino
1992Discourse
Transcription. Santa Barbara: Department of Linguistics,
University of California, Santa Barbara.
Duffy, Sam
2015 “Shaping
Musical Performance Through Conversation.” PhD diss. Queen
Mary University of London.
Givon, Thomas
2001Syntax:
A Functional-Typological Introduction. Amsterdam: John
Benjamins.
Hayashi, Makoto, and Shuya Kushida
2013 “Responding
with Resistance to Wh-questions in Japanese Talk-in-Interaction.” Research on Language and
Social
Interaction 46 (3): 231–255.
Heritage, John
2002 “The
Limits of Questioning: Negative Interrogatives and Hostile Question Content.” Journal of
Pragmatics 34: 1427–1446.
Hsu, Hui-Chieh, Geert Brône, and Kurt Feyaerts
2021 “In
Other Gestures: Multimodal Iteration in Cello Master Classes.” Linguistics
Vanguard 7 (4): 2020086.
Keevallik, Leelo
2011 “Interrogative
‘Complements’ and Question Design in Estonian.” In Subordination in
Conversation: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective, ed. by Ritva Laury, and Ryoko Suzuki, 37–68. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John
Benjamins.
Keevallik, Leelo
2013 “The
Interdependence of Bodily Demonstrations and Clausal Syntax.” Research on Language and Social
Interaction 46 (1): 1–21.
Keevallik, Leelo
2015 “Coordinating the Temporalities of Talk and Dance.” In Temporality in Interaction, ed. by Arnulf Deppermann, and Susanne Günthner, 309–336. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Ladewig, Silva
H.
2014 “Creating Multimodal Utterances:
The Linear Integration of Gestures into
Speech.” In Body-Language-Communication: An International Handbook on
Multimodality in Human Interaction, ed. by Cornelia Müller, Alan Cienki, Ellen Fricke, Silva
H. Ladewig, David McNeill, and Jana Bressem, 1662–1677. Berlin;
Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
Lerdahl, Fred, and Ray
S. Jackendoff
1983A
Generative Theory of Tonal Music. Cambridge: MIT
Press.
Maschler, Yael
2001 “veke’ilu
haragláyim sh’xa nitka’ot bifním kaze (‘And Like Your Feet Get Stuck Inside Like’): Hebrew
kaze (‘like’), ke’ilu (‘like’), and the Decline of Israeli dugri
(‘direct’) Speech.” Discourse
Studies 3 (3): 295–326.
Noonan, Michael
1985 “Complementation.” In Language
Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol 2: Complex Constructions, ed. by Timothy Shopen, 42–140. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Patel, Aniruddh
D.
2003 “Language, Music, Syntax and the
Brain.” Nature
Neuroscience 6 (7): 674–681.
Polak-Yitzhaki, Hilla
2017 “Between
Saying and Doing: The Verb ˈasa (‘Do’) and Other Verbs in Spoken Hebrew Discourse.” PhD
diss. University of Haifa.
Mcdonald, Chris
2013 “Art
Rock.” In Grove Music Online, ed.
By Deane Root. Accessed 17/4/2023.
Messner, Monika
2022 ““Abbiamo
detto con te non che tu hai ta da di da dim (Moves Right Hand on the Beat)” – The Interplay of Semiotic Modes
in Chamber Music Lessons under a Multimodal and Interactional Perspective.” Frontiers in
Communication 7: 877184.
Mondada, Lorenza
2016 “Challenges
of Multimodality: Language and the Body in Social Interaction.” Journal of
Sociolinguistics 20 (3): 336–366.
Reddy, Michael
J.
1979 “The Conduit Metaphor: A Case of
Frame Conflict in Our Language about Language.” In Metaphor and
Thought, ed. by Andrew Ortony, 284–310. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Schegloff, Emanuel
A.
2007Sequence Organization in Interaction: A
Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Streeck, Jürgen
2021 “The
Emancipation of Gestures.” Interactional
Linguistics 1 (1): 90–122.
Thompson, Sandra
A.
2002 “ ‘Object Complements’ and
Conversation: Towards a Realistic Account.” Studies in
Language 26 (1): 125–164.
Tolins, Jackson
2013 “Assessment
and Direction through Nonlexical Vocalizations in Music Instruction.” Research on Language and
Social
Interaction 46 (1): 47–64.
Weeks, Peter
1996 “A
Rehearsal of a Beethoven Passage: An Analysis of Correction Talk.” Research on Language and
Social Interaction 29: 247–290.
Yoeli, Mordechai
1964Taxbir ˈIvri (‘Hebrew
Syntax’). Tel
Aviv: Yesodot.