Grammar, context and the hearer: A proposal for an addressee-oriented model of Functional Discourse Grammar

Riccardo Giomi


This paper addresses two issues related to the overarching question of how to integrate Functional Discourse Grammar (FDG) into a wider theory of verbal interaction (Hengeveld and Mackenzie 2008: 1). First, it proposes an addressee-oriented version of the Grammatical Component, presenting a first attempt to develop an FDG account of language comprehension; second, it aims to shed light on the interaction between the Grammatical and Contextual Components of FDG by exploring this crucial aspect of verbal communication from the perspective of the addressee.

Quick links
A browser-friendly version of this article is not yet available. View PDF
Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I., and M. Schlesewsky
(2009) Processing syntax and morphology: A neurocognitive perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Butler, C
(2008) Cognitive adequacy in structural-functional theories of language. Language Sciences 30.1: 1-30. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chafe, W
(1994) Discourse, Conciousness and Time. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Connolly, J.H
(2007) Context in Functional Discourse Grammar. Alfa: Revista de Lingüística 51/2: 11-33.Google Scholar
this issue) The Contextual Component within a dynamic implementation of the FDG model: Structure and interaction. Pragmatics 24.2: 229-248. Crossref
Cornish, F
(2009) Text and discourse as context: Discourse anaphora and the FDG contextual component. In E. Keizer, and G. Wanders (eds.), Web Papers in Functional Discourse Grammar 82: 97-115.Google Scholar
(2013) On the dual nature of the Functional Discourse Grammar model: Context, the language system/language use distinction, and indexical reference in discourse. Language Sciences 38: 83-98. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
García Velasco, D
(2007) Lexical competence and Functional Discourse Grammar. ALFA: Revista de Lingüística 51.2: 165-187.Google Scholar
this issue) Activation and the relation between context and grammar. Pragmatics 24.2: 297-316. Crossref
Gurevich, O., M. Johnson, and A.E. Goldberg
(2010) Incidental verbatim memory for language. Language and Cognition 2.1: 45-78. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hengeveld, K., and J.L. Mackenzie
(2008) Functional Discourse Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
this issue) Grammar and context in Functional Discourse Grammar. Pragmatics 24.2: 203-227. Crossref
Keizer, M.E
(2007a) Possessive constructions in English: The proposal’s supporters or the supporters of the proposal? In M. Hannay, and G. Steen (eds.), Structural-functional studies in English grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 59-82. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007b) The English Noun Phrase: The Nature of Linguistic Classification. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
this issue) Context and cognition in Functional Discourse Grammar: What, where and why? Pragmatics 24.2: 399-423. Crossref
Lambrecht, K
(1994) Information Structure and Sentence Form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Mackenzie, J.L
(2012) Cognitive adequacy in a dialogic Functional Discourse Grammar. Language Sciences 34: 421-432. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
this issue) The Contextual Component in a dialogic FDG. Pragmatics 24.2: 249-273. Crossref
Pickering, M.J., and S. Garrod
(2004) Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27: 169-226. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2005) Establishing and using routines during dialogue: Implications for psychology and linguistics. In A. Cutler (ed.), Twenty-First Century Psycholinguistics: Four Cornerstones. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 85-102.Google Scholar
O’Neill, G
this issue) Humming, whistling, singing, and yelling in Pirahã. Context and channels of communication in FDG. Pragmatics 24.2: 349-375. Crossref
Van de Velde, F
this issue) The discourse motivation of argument realization in nominalisations. Pragmatics 24.2: 317-348. Crossref